PC 73-135~ ,~
RESCLUTION NO. PC73-135
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCzL OF THE CTTY Or ANAHEIM THA'P
PETITION FOR RECLASSIFICATION NO. ~?-~3-53 gE APPROVED
N WHEREAS, tne City Planning Commission of the City of ":aheim did recelve a veriEied Petition for Reclassifica-
lionfcom MARG.'~RET J. LOVERIN, 215 North Rose, Anaheim, California 92805, Owner; HARRY TRABANT,
632 L'ast Katel2a Avenue, Orange, California 92667, Agent of certain real property situated
in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, Stata of Catifornia, described as The east 200.00
feet of the north 89.16 feet of the south 572.16 feet of the south half of the east half of
tne northeast quarter ~f the northwest quarter of Section i4, Township 4 South, Range 11
Td?e:~, in the Rancho Los Coyotes, as per map recorded in Book 51, Page 11 of Miscellaneous
Maps, in the office of Che county recorder of said county
; end
WNEREAS, the City Planning Comrt~ission did hold e public hearing at the City Hall in the City of Anaheim on
June 11, 1973, at 2:00 o'clock`P:M..notice of said public hearing having bcen duly given as required by
!a•a~ and ir. acr.ordence wiih the provisions of the A'naheim hlur.icipal Code, Chepte: 18.72, to heer end consider evidence
for and against said pioposed reclassification and to.investigate and make findings and recommendations in connection
therewith; end
'NHEREhS, seid Commission, after due inspection, invesligation, and study mede by itseif and in its behelE, and
after due consid~:ati~r, of all evidence and repods oEfeie'd et seid heering, does find and detecmine the Eollowing fects:
1. That the p~:titinner p[oposes : reclassification of the abovz described property from the R-A, A~RICULTURAL~
ZONE to the R-3, MULTIPLE FAMILY REST.DENT;IA•B'; ZONE.
2. That the proposed reclassif9.cati~n is.in conformance witn the land use designation
of the General Plan, .
3. That the proposed ceclessificetion af subject property is necessary and/or desirable for the ccderly aud pru-
per development of the community.
4. Thet 4he p~oposed ceclassification of subject property does properly relete to the zones end their pe:mitted
uses locally estoblished in close proximity to subject propecty and to !he zones and their permitted uses generelly esteb-
lished thcoughout the community.
ENVIRONMENfAL IMPACT REPORT FINDING:
That the Pianning Co~ission, in connection with an Exemption Declaration Ststu~t request,
finds and determines that the proposal would have no significant environmental impacC and,
therefore, recommends to the.City Council that no Environmental Impact Statement is necessary.
R_p -1-
.. . .h
NOW, THEREFC~~2E, BE I'~c.SOLVED that the Aneheim City P1enn~Commission does heroby recommend
to the City Council of the City of Anaheim thet snbject Petition for Reclassificetion be approved end, by so doing,
that Title 18-Zoning ef the Anaheim Municfpal Code be emended to exclude the above described pmperty fcom the
T'.-A, AGRICULTURAL, ZONE and to incorporate said described property into the R-3, MULTIPI,E
r:arsT~Y RESIDENTIAL, 70NE, upon the following conditions which are hereby found to be a
necessary prerequisite Co the proposed use of subject property in order to preserve the
saf2ty and general weZfare of the Citizens of the City of Anaheim:
(1) That the owner(s) oi- subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim Che sum of
$2.00 per front foot along Western Avenue for street lighting purpo~es.
(2) That the owner{s) of subject property sha11 pay to the City of Anaheim the sum.of
60 eents per front foot along Western Avenue for trce planting purgoses.
(3) Thet trash stora~e areas shall be provided in accordance with approved plans on
fi3.e with the off3.ce of the Director oi- Public Works.
(4) That fire hydrants shall be installed and charged as required 2nd determined to
be necessary by the Chief of the Fire Department prio: to co~encement of sl•ructur.al framing.
(5) That- subject property shaYl be served by undeegr~onthetCitt1of,Ansheim the appro-
(6) That the owner(s) of subject praperty shall p y Y
prf.~.te park and recreation in-lieu fees as determined to be appropriete by the City Council,
s2id fees to be paid at the time the buildir.g pe~ni.t is issued.
(7) That drainage oE subject property shall be disposed of in a mar.ner that is satis-
f.ectory to the City Engineer.
(S) That aporopriate water assessment fees as deCermined by the Director of Public
Utiiities shall be paid tn the City of Anaheim pri.or to the issuance of a building permit.
(9) Prior to the introduction of an ordinance rezoning subject property, Condition
Nos. T and 2, above mentioned, shali be completed. The provisions or rights granted by
t?;is resolution shalf become null and void by action of the City Council ur,less said con-
ditions are complied with within one qear from the date hereof or such further time as the
City Council may grant.
(10) That Condition Nos. 3, 5, and 7, above mentioned, shall be complied with prior
to fi;1a1 building and zoning inspections.
T'HE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is signed end e
AT.TEST:
. . ~~~iZv~/
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COM~7ISSION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA }
CCUNTY OF ORANGE 1 s~.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, Ann Krebs, Secretary of the City Planning Commission oE the Ci~y of Aneheim, do hereby certify that
the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted.et a meeting of the City Ylenni.~g Commission oE the City of Anaheim,
held on June 11, 1973, at 2:00 o'clock P.M., by the following vote of the membe:s theceof:
AYES: COMn41SSI0NERS: ALLRED, GAUER, HERBST, KAYWOOD, SEYMOUR,
NOES: COMhiISSIONERS: NONE.
ABSENT: COMMIS$IONERS: FARANO, ROWLANll.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have heceunto set my hand this ~21at dey of June, 1973.
RESOLUTION N0. ~C73-135
R2-A
~jyl~~/%'~k2~
SECRETARY ANAHEIh! CITI PLANNING COMMISSION
-2-