PC 73-162~ ~
RESOLUTION N0. PC 73-162
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLANNInG COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
THAT PETITION FOR VARIANCE N0. 2533 gE GRANTED
~4HEREAS, the City Plenning Commission of the City of Anaheim did receive a verified Petition fo: Variance
from RICHARLI L. SINOR, 700 Nort.". Zeyn, Anaheins, California 92805, Owner; LEW SINUR, 700 North
Zeyn, Anaheim, California 92805, Agent of certain real property situated in the City of Anaheim,
County of Orange, and 9tate of California, described as Lat i of Tract 1940, as per map recorded
in book 82, pages 8, 9 and 10 of Miscellaneous Maps, records of said Orange County
; and
WHEREAS, the City Plenning Commission did hold a public hearing at the City Hall in the City of Anaheim
on July 23, 1973, at 2:00 o'clock P.hi., notice of said public hearin6 heving been duly given es required
by lew and in eccordance with the provisions oE the Anaheim Municipel Code, Chapter 18.68,to hearand consider
evidence Ear end egainst seid proposed variance end to investigate end make findings and recommendatior.s in connec-
tion therewith; and
WHEREAS, said Commissinn, after due inspection, investigetion, and study made by itself end in its behelf,
and aEter due consideratian of all evidence end reports offered at said hearing, does Eind and determine the following
fects: ~
1. Thet the petitionec cequests s veriance from the Aneheim Municipal Code as follows:
e. SECTION 18.38.050(1-A} - ~inimum siCe area. (20,000 square feet required;
8516 square feet proposed)
b. SECTION 18.38.050(3-A)_ - Buildin~ heiRht within 300 feet of a sint~le family
residential zone. (4 feet high at 8 feet from resi-
dential zone permitCed; 12 feet high at 8 feet from
residential zone proposed)
2. That the petitioner proposes to construct a conmiercial office building.
3; Thet there are exceptionel or extraordinery circumstances or conditions applicable to the property involved
or to the intended use of the property thet do not apply generallp to the property or cless of use in the same vicinity
and zone.
4. Thet the requested variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right
possessed by other property in the seme vicinity end zone, and denied to the property in question.
5. That the requested vnrience will nat be matecially detrimental to the public welfece or injucious to the pmp-
erty or improvements in such vicinity and zone in which tfie propeity is loceted.
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FINDING:
That the Planning Commisaion, in connection with an Exemption Declaration Status requeat, finds
and determines that the proposal wauld heve no significant environmental impact and, thereEore,
recommends to the City Council that no Environmental Impact Statement ia necessary.
V1-G -1-
' NOW, TEaEREFORE, BE IT RES~OLVED that the Anaheim City Plenning Co~mmission does hereby gcant subject
Petition for Varience, upon t'r.e following conditions which ece heceby found to be e necessary prerequisite to the pro-
posed use of the subject property in oeder to preserve the safety and general welEare of the Citizens of the City of
Anaheim:
(1) That this Variance is granted subject to the completion of Reclassification No.
69-70-37, nnw pending.
(2) That the owner(s) o£ subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the sum of
$2.00 per front £oot along Lincoln Avenue for street lighting purposes.
(3) That the owner(s) of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the sum of
60 cents per front foot along Lincoln Avenue and Gilbert Street, for tree planting purpoEes.
(4) That subject property shall be served by underground utilities.
(5) That the final parking plan shell be approved by the Development Servicas Department
and any landscaped areas in the parkins area shall be protected with six-inch high concrete
curbs, and concrete wheel stops shall be provided L•~r parking spacss as required.
(6) That drainage of •subject property shall be disposed of in a manner that ia satis-
factory to the City Engineer.
(7) That subject property shall be developed substantially in conformance with plans
and specific+ations on fiie with the City of Anaheim, marked Exhibit No. 1.
(8) Prior to the introduction of an ordinance rezoning sub3ect property under Reclassi-
fication No, 69-70-37, Condition Nos. 2 and 3, above mentioned, shall be completed. The
provisions or righCs granted by this resolution shall become null and void by action of the
City Council unless said conditions are complied with within one year from the date hereof
or such further time as the City Council may grant,
(9) That Con3ition D]os. 4, 5, 6, and 7, above menL•ioned, shall be complied with prior
to final building and zor~ng inspections.
TAE FOItEGOING RESQLUTION is aigned end approved by me this 2nd day of August, 1973.
ATTEST:
~ oO.~~~ ~'~~~~ ,
HAIRMAN ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION ~
~~~!/YU~?/ %~~2C~ ~/
SECRETARY At~AHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) eg•
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, Ann Krebs, Secretery of the City Planning Commission of the Ciry of Anehe~m, do hereby certify th~t
the foregoing resolution was pessed end adopted at a meeting of the City Plenning Commission oEthe City of Anaheim,
held on July 23, 1973, et 2:00 o'clock P.M., by the following vote of the members thereoE:
AYES: COMMTSSIONERS: ALLRED, GAUER, KING, ROWLAND, SEITSOUR,
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE.
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: FARANO, HERBST,
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I heve hereunto set my tand thia 2nd day of August, 1973.
RESOLUTION N0. PC73-162
.~~~/,~~2~(~
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
V2-G -2-