PC 73-180, ~. . ~ ~
RESOLUTION N0. PC73-~80
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSiON OF THE CITY OF ANAHEYM
RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM THAT
PETITION FOR RECLASSIFICATION NO. 7~-74-~ BEAPPROVED
WHEREAS, the City Plenning Commission of the City of Aneheim did receive a verified Petition for lZe-
clessificetion from ALBERT R. BRADLEY, i2882 Fieldstone Drive, Santa Ana, Cal ifornia 92705,
Owner o` certain real property situatcd in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State
of Califor~ia described as Beginring aY. the Northeast cor•ner of Lot 1 of Tract No. 1843
as per map th~reof rer,orded in Book 53. Page 46 of Miscellaneous Maps, Records of Oran~e
Caunty, Califom ia; thence North 89° 51' 35" East along the South line of said Tract 1843,
6.57 feet; thence South Oo 09' S5" West, parall~l to the East line of said Northwest quarter
of the Southwest quarter, 235.20 feet to the center line of A~aheim-Olive Road as shown on
said map;thence North 780 52' 26" West along said center line 6,57 `eet to the intersection
of said center line wiih the Southerly prolongetion of tha East line of Said Lot 1; thence
North Oo 07' 35" East along said East line of Lot 1 a~d its Southerly prolongation, 233.92
t`eet to the point of beginning
; and
WHEREAS, the City Plenning Commission did hold e public heering et the City Hell in the City of Anaheim
on August 20, 19J3,at 2:00 o'clock P.M. notice of said public headng heving been duly given en required by
law and in accordence with the provisions of the Meheim Munlcipel Code, Chepter 18.72, :o hear and consider
evidence Eor and against seid proposed reclessificetion end to investigate endmeke findings endrecommendations
in connection therewith; end
WHEREAS, said Commisslon, after due inspection, investigation, end study mede by itself end in its be-
half, and aEter due cansiderstion of ell evidence end reports oEfeced at said hearing, does find end determine the
following fects:
1. Thet the petitioner proposas e reclessification oE the above described property from the R-1 , ONE FAN I LY
RESIDENTIAL, ZONC to the G-0, COMMERCIAL-OFFICE, ZONt,
2. Tnat the ~roposed reclassificaiion is in c:;iiormunce ~;i:li the land use desi-•~ia-
tion of the Generai Plan.
3. That the proposed reclassirication of SU~JEGC F+roparty is necessary a~cfc~r desir••
able for the orderly and proper development of the community.
4. Thit the proposed reclas;ification of subject property does,properly relate to
the •ones and their permitted uses locally established in clo;e proximity to subject prop-
erty and to the zones and their permitted uses generally established throughout the com-
munity,
5. That the proposed reclassification ~f subject property req~_ires the dedication
and improvement ot~ the abuttirg alley in accordance with the Area Development Plan No. 113
due to the anticipated increase in traffic which will be generated by the lntertsiFication•
of land use.
6. That the p°titioner sti~ulated to the removal of the existing garage.
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT EIhDING:
That t~e Planning Cormission, in conneciion with an Exerr.ption Declaration StatuS request,
fin•!s and determines tha*_ the proposal would have nc si9nificant environmental impact, and,
therefore, recommends to Che City Lo~ncil that no Environrr,ental Impact Statement is nec-
es>ary.
RD -1'
' w NOW, THEREFORE, BE ~SOLVED that the Aneheim City Plenn~ommission does hereby recommend
to the City Council of the City of Anaheim that eubjezf Petition for Reclassificakion be approved end, by so doing,
tha4 ;G'itle 1&Zoning of the Anaheim Municipal Code be emended to exclude the ahove deactlbed pmperty from the
P.-1, ONE-FAMIIY P.c51DEN71Al~ ZONE and to incorporate said desc~ibed property into the
C•(~, ~COt4MERi+:A! OFFICE, ~.UNE, ~pAn the follcw3~g conditions which are hereby found to be
a necessary prereq~csit~ to the projrased use of subject property in or•der to preserve the
safety and general wel~ar~ of Ch2 Citizens of the City of Anaheim:
(1) That the owner(s) o~ subject ~roperty shall deed to the Cit;~ of Anaheim a strip
of larad 53 fQet in width from tfie eenter9i:~P. of the streat along Lirscoln Avenue for street
widen~:~g purposes.
(2) T1;5t. the oNner(s) of subj~zt property shall pay to the City of An~heim the sum
of $2.00 per ft^ont foot a;or~3 Li~coln Avenue for strect lighting purposes.
(3) That the o~rrn°r(s) of subject property sh311 conditionaliy dedicate to the City
o~ Anaheim a~tc'ip of land 5'FeEt in width from Che centerline of the alley along the north
side of subiect property for alley widening purposes in accordance with Area Development
Plan No. 113.
(4) That the vehicular access rights to Lincoin Avenue shall be dedicated to the
City of Ar~ahEim, in accordance witt~ Area Development Plan No. 113.
j;) 7hat trash storage areas shall be provided in accordance with approved plans
on t!fe r,~tth the office oP the 6trector of Public Works.
;ij That a!1 .:£r condiYiet:in; `acilities shail be nroperly shielded from view, and
the saund bu`fered from adjacr:nt proF,lrties.
(71 That t'l;~ e:xisting ';:iucture shall be brought up to the minim~m standards of the
Gity of ~baah9's~,~; :~~~fud'i~7g ch~~. lJ~~`fern Bu?;ding, Plumbirg, Eiectrisal, Housing, Mechanical,
and :'ire Corles as ado{~ted by tha City of P,na;~eim.
~R) That the fi~cl varkfng pla~ shall be approved by the Development Services Depart-
menL, ~ad any landscaped a~~~as Fn the parking area shall be protected with 6-inch high, con-
crete. r~.;~,, and concrete uhe~l stops .Sball be provid~d for parking spaces as required.
(9) That the s8a4(.a~7k- ~;~all be repaired alon9 Lincoln Avenue as required by the City
tngineer and in accordance •aith s:a;adard plans and specifications on file in the office of
t~e Ctiy Enginee~.
(10) That tim• e„~~2.~g garage shall be removed, as stipulated to by the petitioner.
(11) Priar Lo th~ introduction of an ordinance rezoning subject property, Conditions
Nos. 1, 2, 3 a~~' 4, above mentioned shall be c~mpleted. The provisions or rights granted
by ~his res~olu~i<tiro shail become n~li and void by action of the City Council unless said
conditions a~re t-~.;~??e3 witti w~thin one year from the date hereof or such further time as
the City Counc+l ma4 grant.
(12) That Cond,irtion.Nos. 5,6, 7. $, 9 and 10, above merrt+oned, shall be complied wiYh
prior to fina5 rvilding and zoning inspections. ~
(13) Tha: Nrior to the i~troductior of an ordinance rezo~ing subject property to the
C-0 zone, precise development pians shall be submitted to the Plannir~g Commission and City
Council for appeaval.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is sig~ed and appr ved l~y me th.is 30th day..of Hugust,:i973.
AT.TEST: i ~
SECRETARY ANAH IM C1TY PLANNING COMMISSION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss~
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, Ann Krebs, Seccetary of the City Planning Commission of the Ci~y of Aneheim, do hereby certify that
the foregoing resolution was psssed and edopted at a meeting oE the City Planning Commission oE the City of Aneheim,
held on August 20, ' a73 ~ at 2:00 o'clock P.M., by the following vote ot the members thereof:
AYES: ~:^F«MISS90NERS: ALLRED, FARANO, GAUE.R, HERBST, KING, ROWLAND, SEYMOUR,
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE,
AB5ENT: COMMIS$IONERS: NONE,
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I heva hereunto set my hand this 30th ddy of Auaust, 1973.
RESOLUTION NO. pC]3-180
. ~i
SECRETARY ANAHEIM TY PLANNING COMMISSION
R2-A "2'