Loading...
PC 73-183~ ~ RESOLUTION NO. P~73-1~3 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLANNING COMM1SSInN OF THE CITY Or ANA},F.?M THAT PETITION FOR VARIANCE NO. 2538 HE GRANTED WH~REAS, the C:ity Planning Commission of the t:itv bf Anplet.iin did rECai~e e verifie8 Retition for 1~erience from J~i;EFh AND ANNE Fi~!?? 1 S, 1904 U i ctor i a lrven;~e, Anahe i m, Cai i i orn i a e~.;`•`:~•'.~ ~<:. Owner of certa i n real prope;tv y4CU~.'1:~ b:: ._ ~it;~ 2=` r~;~:r`-~3r;;, ~~!;^ty of Orange, Stahc: o~ ~~i:~»~ornia described as L~~t No. 3A~ of 'ea~t 2299, in thE 1,:4y v=i Rn.a#:ei=~: ~zs per map recc?~~ied vri;it 70, Pages 44 to 49 inclusi•ue, :.•2 Niscc~t~r~eous 'Mapsj i'; ".''~i o?~~"ir,~. eW~ :he County ~+~;ccrd- ~ of said Orar.g: County ; and WHEREAS, the City Plenning Commission did hold a pub]ic hearing at the City :iall in the City of Anaheim an August 20, 1973, et 2:00 o'clock P.M., notice of seid public hearing having been duly given as cequired by lew and in eccordence with the provisions of the Aneheim Municipal Code, Chepter 18.68,to heer and consider evidence Eot and against seid proposed verience and to investigete and meke Eindings and recommendations in connec- tion therewith; and WHEREAS, said Commissinn, after due inspection, investiga4ion, end study mede by itself and in its behelf, and after due consideretion of all evidence end reports oEEered at seid hearing, does Eind and determine the folluwing facts: ~ 1. Thet the petitioner requests a variance Erom the Anaheim Municipel Code as fol lows, :o permi t the con- tiinued use of an existing room additian: SECTION i8.24.030(3-b) - Minimum rear yard setback.(10 feet required; 6 feet proposed) 2. That there are exceptional or extraordinary circumstences o. cenditions appliceble to the propecty involved or to the intended use of the property thnt do not apply generelly to the property or class of use in the same vioinity end zone. 3. Thet the requested va~iance is necessery for the preservation end enjoyment of a substantial pcoperty righl possessed b~ other property in the seme vicinity end zone, end denied to the property in question. 4. That the requested veriance will not be materially detrimental to the public welfate or injurious to the pmp- erty o* impcovements in such vicinity and zone in which the QcopeRy is loceted. ENVIRQNMENTAL {MPACT FEPORT FINDING: That the Planning Commission, in connection with an~Exemption Declaration Status request, finds and determines that the proposal would have no significant environmental impact ar~d, therefore, recommends to the City Council that no Environmental Impact S:atement is necessary. V 1-G -1- . ~ ~ .. .. _ NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning Commission does heceby grant subject petition for Verience, upon the following conditions which are heceby found to be a necessary pcerequisite to the pco- posed use of the subject property in order to pceserve the sefety and generel welfare of the Citizens of the City of Anaheim: , (1) That subJect property shall be developed substantially in accordance with plans and specificat3ons on file with the City of Anaheim marked Exhibit Nos, 1 and 2. (2) 1'hat the existing strsctu~•e shall be brought up to the mi~imum standards of the City of Anaheim, including the Uniform Building, Plumbing, Electrical, Housic~g, Mechanical and Fire Codes as adopted by the City of Anaheim. THE FOREGOING RESOT.UTION is eigned end approved by me this 30th day of August, 1973. ATTEST: i~~.~,G~~~~~ ~~ ~~~~ _~ CHAIRMAN ANAHEIM CITY F'LANNING COMMISSION ~~~~~ ~~~n/ SECRETARY ANAHEIM ITY P?.ANNING COMMISSION STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) 8$• CITY OF AMAHEIM ) I, Ant~ KCebs, Seccetary of the City Plenning Commission of the City of Aneheim, do hereby certify that the foregoiag resolutlon wes passed and adopted at e meeting of the City Plenning Comr~ission oE the City of Anaheim, held on August 20, 1973 s et 2:00 o'clock P.M., by the following vote oE the mem6ecs thereof: AYES: COh1MISSIONERS: ALLRED, FARANO, GAUER, HERBST, KING, ROWLAND, SEYMOUR. NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE. ABSENT: COWIMISSIONERS: NONE. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I heve hereunto set my hend this 30th day of August, 1973• RESOLUTION N0. PC73-183 ~i~%!~/J'C/ SEf'RETARY ANAHEI CITY PLANNING COMMISSION V2-G '2'