PC 73-209RESOLUTION~NO. PC73-209 ~
A RESOLUTYON OF THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
THAT PETiTION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT ~425 ng GgANTED IN PART
WHEREAS, the City Placming Commission of the City of Aneheim did receive a verified Petition for Con-
ditional Use Permit from $ERT BLEDSOE~ 1300 Miramar, Fullerton~ C&lifornia 92631, Owner of
certain real property situated in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of
California, described as Lot 33 of the ~ucalyptus Forest Tract, as per map recorded
in book S, pages 29 and 30, of Miscellaneous M~ps, in the office of the county recorder
of caid county
; and
WHEREAS, the City Plenning Commission did hold e public hearing at the City He11 in the City of Anaiieim
on September 17 ~ 1973, at Q:00 o'clock P.M., notice of said public heering hu~~ing been duly given
as cequired by law and in accordance with the provisions oEthe Anaheim Municipel code, Chapter 18.64,to hear
and consider evidence for end against seid proposed conditionel use and to investigate end moke Eindings end
recommendations in connection therewith; and
WHEREAS, seid Commission, efter due inspection, investigetion, end study mede by itselE and in its be-
half, end atter due consideration oE all evidence nnd reports offered at sefd heering, does find end determine the
following fects:
1. Thet the proposed vse is properly one for which a Conditionel Use Permit is authorized by Code Section
18.52.050(1-a) to wit: eatablish a contractor's storage yard with waiver~s of:
a. SECTION 18.5G.060(2-a-3) - Landscaped front setback. (Fite-foot fully
lsndscaped setback required; no landacaping
proposed)
b. SECTION 18.52.060(5)_ - SCaudard refuse storage area. (None proposed)
2. That Waiver 1-a, above mentioned, is hereby denied on the basis that the peti-
tioner indicated that thp office structure proposed as a future building a].ong the Le
Creata Avenue frontage would be constructed within three aonths; therefore, the land-
scaping should be provided upon completion of said structurc. or, if the str~ictnre is noC
co~pleted within six monthe, then landscaping should be provided at the end of said time
since landecaped setbacks in the industrial areas have always been required,
3. That Waiver 1-b, above mentioned, is hereby denied on the basis that although
the petitioner indicated he woiild remove his own trash, Section 6.21.070 of the Anaheim
Municipal Code, which is not within the jurisdiction of the Planning C~+mmixsion, pro-
hibita other than an authorized contractor to dispoae uf refuse; and that with the pres-
ent high turnover rste of the various businesses in the coc~unity, it ie likely that
subject site could be occupied by some other induetry which would need normal refuse '
service, and adequate re£use storage areas would then be ava~,lable.
4. That the proposed use, as granted, wi21 not adv~rsely affect the adjoining.land
uses and the growth and development of the area in which it ~s propoaed to be lecated.
5. That the size and shape of the si'~•a proposed for the use, as granted, is ade-
Suate tc allow the full deve?opment of tbF proposed use in a manner not detrimenCal to
the particular area nor to the peace, heall•h, safety, and general welfare of the Citizens
of the City of Anaheim.
6, That the granting of the Conditional Use Permit, as graated and under the condi-
tions imposed, if an;y, will not be detrimental Co the peace, health, safety, and general
welfare of the Citiz~>_ns of the City of Anaheim.
7. That two pe~~sons appeared in opposition, one repreaenting industry in the aren,
and a letter was rece~ived, also in opposxtion to waiverg being requested.
~ ~
ENVIRONMENTAL I:~SPACT REPORT FINDING:
That the Planning C~mmission, in connection with an Exemptior. Declarstion Status request,
finds and determines that the proposel w~uld heve no significant environmental impact and,
therefore„ recommends to thE City Council that no Environmental Impact Statement 1s neces-
sary.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Anaheim CiCy Planning Commission does hereby
grant, in part, subject Petition for Conditional Use Permit, upon the following conditions
which are hereby found to be a neceasary prerequisite to the proposed use oi the subject
property in order to preserve the safety and general wel~are of Che Citize'~ZS of the City
of Anaheim:
(1) That the owner(s) of subject property shall deed to the City of Anaheim a strip
of land 32 feet in width from the centerline of the street along La Cresta Avenue for
street widening purposes,
(2) That all engineering requirements of. L•he City o£ Anaheiin, along La Cresta Ave-
nue, including preparation of improvement• plans and installation of all improvemer~ts such
as curbs and gutters, sidewalks, street grading and paving, drainage facilities, or other
appurtenant work shall be complied with as required by the City Engir.eer and in accordance
with standard plans and specif.ications on file in the office of the City Engineer; that
street lighting facilities along La Cresta Avenue shall be installed as require3 by the
Director of Public Utilikies and in accordance with standard plans and specifications on
file in the office of the Director of Public Utilities; and that a bond in an amonnt and
form satisfactory to the City of Anaheim shall be posted with the City to guarantee the
installation of the above menCioned requirement3.
(3) That fire hydrants shall be inatalled and charged as required and determined
to be necessary by the Chief of the tire Department.
(4) That trash storage areas shall be provided in accordance with approved plans
on file viCh the office of the Director of Public Worka,
(51 That subject property she11 be served by underground u~ilities.
(6) That drainage of subject property shall be disposed of in a manner satisfacCor~
to the City Engineer.
(7) That the finel parkicg plan shall be approved by the Development Services De-
partment, and any landscaped areas in the parking arees ahall be protected with sis-inch
high concrete curbs, attd concrete wheel stops shall b~ provided for parking spaces.
(8) That subject property shall be developed substantially in accordenca with plans
and specifications on fi'!e with the City of Anaheim marked Exhibit No.. 1 provided, how-
ever, that the required landacaping shall be installed ana maintained within six monthe
of the granting of thia petition.
(9) That Condition Nos. 1 and 2, above mentioned, shall be complied with prior to
the commencemenC of the activity authorized under this resolution, or prior to the time
that the Uuilding permit is fesued, or. wich$n a period of une year from date hereof, wt;ich-
ever occurs first, or such further time as the Planning Commission may grant.
(10) That Condition Nos. 4, 5, 6, 7, und 8, above mentioned, shall be complied witii
prior to final building and zoning inspections.
(11) That no sCorage in the yard will be pr.rmitted to exceed Che height of the aix-
foot masonry wall.
rkl~ rOREGOING RESOLUTION is signed and approved by me this 27th day of September„ 1973.
~~o~~~~'~~YrE' , ~C'I~l~ ~
CHAIP.MAN ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
ATTEST:
(~Z%/'~y~ ~/~LQ~/~s~
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
RESOLUTION N0. PC73-209 '2'
u
STATE OF CALIFORN7A )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) 89•
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
~
I, Ann Krebs, Secretary of the City Planning Coffiniasion of the City of Anaheim, do
hereby certify tl~at the foregoing resolution was passed end adopted at a meeting of ~
the City Planning Co~nission of the Citq of Anaheim, held on September 1', 1973, at
2;00 o°clock p.m., by the following vote of the members thereof:
AYES: CO[4TISSIO*IERS: ALLRED, FARANO, GAUER, KING, SEYMOUR.
NOES: COrR4ISSI0NERS: NONE.
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: HERBST.
ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: ROWLAND.
IP; WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 2~th day of September, 1973.
/ A ~A/l// / J~ L~~~
SECRETARY ANAHE~`1 CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
TcESOLUTION I~O. PC73-209 '3'