PC 73-215.. _ : ~
~
~~
RESOLUTION NO. PC7~-215
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAI{EIM
RECOh1\SENDING TO TFIE CITX COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIhi THAT
PETITION FOR RECLASSIFICATION N0. 73'74-22 BE APPROVED
WHEREAS, tne City Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim did i ni •tiate a verified~ Peti:ti~un ~ for
Reclassification on property situated in the City of Anaheim, Couzty of Orange, S[ate of
California, as described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and referred to herein as though
set forth in full
PROPERTY OWNERS:
Frank J. Currie, 206 South Highland Avenue, Placentia, California 92670
Anthony W. Barksdale, et al, 1863 West Cris Avenue, Anaheim, Califorttia 92805
; end
WHEREAS, the City Planning Comrt~ission did hold a public heacing et the City Hall in the City oE Aneheim on
Sep*_em6?r 1?, t973 aY2:00 o'cloek P.ht. notice of said public hearing having been duly given as required by
law and in accordance with the provisions of the Anaheim 114unicipal Code, Chapter 18.72, to hear end consider evidence
for and against seid proposed x:classiEication and ta :.nvestigete and make findings and recommendetions in connection
therewith; and .
WHEREAS, said Commission, aftec due inspection, investigation, and study made by itselt end in its behalf, aad
efter due consideration of ell evidence and reports offered at said hearing, does find and determine the following facts:
1. Thatthe Planning Commission proposes a reclassfication of th'e above described
property from the R-A, AGRICULTIRALyZONE to the RH-22,000 RESIDENTIAL HILLSIDE, ZONE.
2. ?hat the proposed reclassification will establisli a resolution of intent or. the
property at such time as developmert of the property is proposed.
;• 3. That the proposed reclassificatian isi"n:conformance with the land use designation
of the General Plan.
4.. Thet the proposed ceclassificetion of subject property is necessery and/or deslrable forthe orderly and pco-
per development of the community.
5'. Thet the proposed ceclessificetion of subject property does properly relate to the zones and their permitted
uses locally estebltshed in close proximity to subject property end to the zor.es and their permitted uses generally estab-
lished throughout the community.
~ 6. That the proposed reclassification of subject property requires the dedication
and improvement of abutting streets in accordance with the Cires~lation Element of tfie
General Plan, due to the anticipated increase in traffic which will be generated by the
intensification of land use.
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPOP,T FINDiNG:
That tne Planning Commission, in connection with an Exemption Declaration Status request,
finds and determines Lhat the proposal would ha~~e no significant e^vironnw_ntal impact and,
therefore, recommends to the City Council that no Environmental Impact Statement is.neces-
sary.
R-A '1~
~ .
~~ ~~:TKI~3IT ",~„
PROPOSED ~
~ ' MOHLER DRIVE IdO. 2 ANLiE~TIOiJ
TO . . .
• CITY OF ANAHEIM
That parcel of land'locateci in the County of Orange, State of ' •
CaliEornia, described as follc~wse ~. ~ •
Beginning at e poiat in the exist~.ng City Linit line of the City of.
Anaheim, as established by the D:ohler Drive Annexatian to said City
cer~ified by the Secretary of 5tate Apri1.2,...1973, said point of
beginning being a point in the south line of T,ract No. 117, as shown
on a map recorded in Sook 11, page 15, Miscellaneous biaps, recor~s of
said Orange County, distant East 870.94 feet from the southwest corr.er
Gi .._=e:i:J:t ..i~ 'TC':...;~'il~? „$01LR~ Rcl2~^y2 Y3 ':~E.'S~~ ~.B.B. & i•I., t2'ici~Cc
lsaving said annexation bcundary Lt 0° O1' 00" W, 330.41 feet alottg
the easterly line of the land'described in dced recorded July 18, 1967
in•Book 8314, page 249, Official Records of said Orange County, to an
intersection with the northerly Iine of the land deacribed in Parcel
One in deed recarded aoril 8, 1960 in Book 5180, p~ge ;23, Official
Records of said Orang~ Cou:ty; thence tQ 89° 04' 29" E, 109.95 feet;
thenr.e S 82° 09' 1 ~" E, 51~'~.45 reet al.nnr, a portion oF l•hs northerll
line of the land described in lhc ;ast cnentioried deed ta an ir.ter-
s:ction orith t.hQ we~terly li~e .f ~L•he land Gescribed as °arcel One in
the d~ed recorded Januarj 3Q, 1973 in Book 1Q533, page 793, Official
"Record:, or said Ozar.ge Coutity; thence followi.^.g along the last
Page 1 0£ 2
. • !.
~
~
~ . .. ,
.
Proposed •. ~~ •
• riohler Drive No. 2 Annexation ~ . ~ • .' .
.. To • ~. . .
City of Anaheim ~ ~ ~ . • . .
~ mentioned westerly line, the northerly line and the easterly line of
• the land described in said Parcel.One; the following courses a?:d•
distances: N 6° 30' 33" E, 301.67~feet; Ld 69° li)' 30" E, 29.00 feet;
,~ . S 69° SS' 30" E, 313.4o feet.; N 87° 53' 2Q" E, 10i+.12 feet;
S 57° 11' 10" il~ 140.71 feet; S 30° 00' 00" W~ 66.1~0 feet; S 15° 00'
00" V7, 176.00 feet to the sontheast corr,er of said .Parcel One, said '
soutneast corner also beir.g the north~ast corner of the land described
in Parcel•Oae in the aforementioned deed recorded April 8, 19'v0 in
Eook 5156, pay-e 123, Official Records of said Orange Cour.ty; thence
~ following along tha easterly line oE the land~described in~the last
' ,[Cl0t1t10RL'C~ GBE'_C; th= fo]]nwing CO~1:S_,°, ,.^~ u~3~cl.-.C~S: $ li~ Ul~~ 'J~~`i ~'~~
• ~~
~ 55.00 feet; S 49° 00' 00" E, 90.00 feet; S 12° 00' 00" Y7, 114.00 feet
to an intersection with the sout:zerly line of the aforementioned
Tract Plo. 7.17, said point of intersection being in the existin~ ~
Anaheim anaexation roundary as established by the afore;nentioned
Mohler Drive Annexation; thence Nest 937.91 feet along said existing
annexz:,ion boundary, being.a portion of the southerly line of said
~ Tract i:o. 117 to the point of bcginning.
Page•2•of 2 ,
. ,
5' ~
.~
~ .,.,
~ ~
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: ALLRED, FARANO, GAUER, HERBST, KING, ROWLAND, SEYMOUR.
NOES:: COMMISSIONERS: NONE.
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE.
IN WITNE55 WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my~hand this 27th day of September, ~973.
~~~~~~~
SECRETARY ANAH M CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
RESOLUTION N0. PC73-Z15
-3-