PC 73-223~• - ~
RESOLUT~N N0. P~~''~ " -
A RESOLUTiON OF THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL ~F THE CITY OF ANAHEIM THAT
PETITTOII FOR RECLASSIFICATION N0. 74-74-23 HE APPROVED
WHEREAS, ti~e City Plenning Commission of the City oE Aneheim did receive a verified Petition for Reclassifica-
tionfrom HULEN E. AND HESiER Y, SLAYTON, 1010 South Anaheim Boulevard, Anaheim, California
92805, in care of John W. Zylstra, 710 North Euclid Street, No. 220, Anaheim, California
g2801; Owners of certain real property situated in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, .
State of California described as That oortion of Lot 25 of Anaheim Extension, as shown on
a map survey by William Hamel, a copy of which is'shown in book 3, pa9es 162 and 164 in-
clusive of "Los Angeles County Maps", in the office of the County Recorder of said Orarx~e
County, described as follows: Beginning at the Southeast corner of Lot 2, of Tract No. 1379,
as shown on a map recorded in book 43, pages 6 and.7 of Miscellaneous Maps, records of said
Orange County; thence along the Southerly prolongation of the Easteriy line of said Lot 2
South 15° 32' 15" East 122.00 feet totFie'Southerly line of th<at certain land described in
deed to Hulen E. Slayton and wife, recorded September 11, 19~E8 in book 1699, page 191 of
Official Records of said Orange County; thence along said Southerly line North 74° 13' 45"
East 152.61 feet to the Southwesterly corner of that certain land described in deed to
Donald Thompson and wife, recorded February 7, 1966 in book 7833, page 31 of said Official
Records; thence along the Westerly line of said last mentioned land North 15° 32' 15" West
99.73 feet to the Northwesterly corner thereof; thence along the Westerly prolongation of
the Northerly line of said land South 74° 27' 45" blest 22.00 feet to the intersection with
the Southerly prolongation of the Easterly line of Lot ~ of said Tract No. 1379; thence
along said last mentioned prolongation North 15° 32' 15" West 22.18 feet to the Southeast-
erly corner thereof;thence along the Southerly line of said Lot 3 and the Westerly prolon9-
ation thereof South 74° 13' 45" West 131.46 feet to the Point of Beginning
; end
WHEREAS, thc City Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at the City Hell in the City of Aneheim on
October 1, 1973, at 2:00 o'clock P.M. notice of seid pub?ic heacing having been duly given as requiced by
law and in accocdance with the provisions oEfhe Anaheim 1Nunicipol Code, Chepter 18.72, to hear and consider evidence
for and ageinst seid pioposed reclasszficetion and to investigate and make findings and recammendations in connection
therewith; end
WHEREAS, said Commission, after due inspection, investigetion, and study made by itself and in its behalf, and
after due consideretion of ell evidence end repo:ts offered at said hearing, does find end determine the Eollowing fects:
1. That the petitioner proposes a reclessiEication of the ebove described property from the R-1 , ONE FAlil LY
RESIDENTIAL, ZONE to the C-1, GENERAL COMMERCIAL, ZONE to utilize the property as a parking
area for a proposed.3~story medical office structure to the west fronting on Anaheim Boule-
vard.
2. That the pruposed reclassification is not in conformance with the General Plan,
however, it would be a logical location for a parking area if the frontage of the property
along Anaheim Boulevard aiere developed aiith a two or three-strey structure.
?. That the pcoposed reclassification of subject pcoperty is necessery end/or desirabie toc the orderly end pro-
per development of the community.
4. That the proposed ceclessificetion of subJect pcoperty does pcoperly celete to the zones and their permitted
uses locelly established in close proximity to subject property end to the zones end their permitted uses genereliy esteb-
lished throughout the community.
5, That the petitioner stipulated to providing adequate drainage for the existing
single-family development tn tl,~e east.
ENVIRONMENTAL It4PACT REPORT FIt~01NG;
That the Planning Commission, in connection with an Exemption Oeclaration Status request,
finds and determines that the proposal would have no significant environmental impact and',
therefore, recommends to the City Council that no Environmental Impact Statement is neces-
sary. •
R-A '1"
~..~ _
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ~OLVED that the Anaheim Cit•~ P1 ing Commission does hereby
recommend to the City Council of the City of Anaheim that subject Petition for Reclassifica-
;ion be approved and, by so doing, that Title 18-Zoniny of the Anaheim Municipal Code be
amended to exclude the above described property from the R-1, ONc-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL, ZONE
and to incorporate said described property into the C-1, GENERAL COMMERCIAL, ZONE, upon the
following conditions which are het'eby found to be a necessary prerequisite to the proposed
u~se of subject property in order to preserve the safety and general welfare of the Citizens
of the City of Anaheim:
(1) 7hat the owner(s) of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the sum
of $2.00 per front foot along Charlotte Avenue and Claudina Street for street lighting
purposes.
(2) That the owner(s) of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the sum
of 60C per front foot along Charlotte Avenue and Claudina Street for tree plantin9 purposes.
(3) ihat trash stora,e areas shall be provided in accordance with approved plans on
file with the office of tiie Director of Public 4lorks, and shall be relocated away from the
single family residence to the east.
(4) That all air conditioning facilities shall be pr~perly shEelded from view, and
the sound buffered from adjacent properties.
(5) That subject property shall be served by underground utilities.
(6) That a 6-foot masonry wall shall be constructed along the east property line
and south property line adjacant to Claudina Street.
(7) That drainage of subject property shall be dispose.d of in a manner satisfactory
to the City Engineer.
(8) That the final parking plan shall be approved by the. Development Services Depart-
ment, and any landscaped areas in the parking areas shall be protected with 6-inch high,
concrete curbs, and concrete wheel stops shall be provided for parking spaces.
(g) That a 5-foot landscape buffer ~trip shall be provided along the east property
line separating and protecting the single family residence from odors and noises emanating
from the parking area.
(10) That subject property shall be developed substantialiy in accordance with plans
and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim marked Exhibit No. 1, provided however,
that a o-foot wall or crash gate shall be constructed at the exit to Claudina Street.
(11) Prior to the introdur~:`.^s; ~:.~',^ or6inance rezoning subject property, Conditions
Nos. 1 and 2, above mentioned, s•-'• ~~• completed, The provisions or rights granted by
this resolution shall become n~11~ •x~'~ ;~id hy action of the City Council unless said
conditions are complied with witF ,.-.1..'N-~~' from the da*_e hereof, or such further time
as the City Counr.il may grant,
(12) That Condition Nos. 3, 4, 5, 6, 7~ 8, 9, and 10 above mentioned, shall be complied
with prior to final building and zoning inspections.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is signed and approved by me this 17th day of October, 1973.
~~~,~.~,~~o~,~--
CHA I RMAN AiJAHE I M CTTY PLANN I NG CO F1T53'~fUN7
ATTEST:
. ~~~~
SECRETARY ANANEIM ITY PLANNING C~MMISSION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
RESOLUTION N0. Pc73-z23 'Z'
-'` ' ~ ~
I, Ann Krebs, Secretary of the Anaheim City Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim,
do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of the
City Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim, held on October 1, t973, at 2:00 o'clock
P.M, by the following vote of the members thereo`:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: ALLRED, FARANO, GAUER, HERBST, KING, ROWLAND, SEYMOUR.
NOES: •COMMISSIONERS: NONE,
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE.
fN WITNESS WHEREOF, I ha~ie hereunto set my hand this 11th day of October, 1973.
~
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
RESOLUTION N0. PC73-223 -3-