PC 73-238~ ~
RESOLUTION NO. p~~3-238
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
THAT PETITION FOR VARIANCE NO. Z561 BE GRANTED
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission of the City o: Anaheim did receive a verified Petition for Vacience
from PICK RANCHES, 1833 South State College Bmulevard, Anaheiw, California 92806, Owner;
RUSTIC HOMES, INCORPORAT~D~ in care of Bruce Pickard, 1124 Independence Avenue, Mou[itain
View, California ~4040, Agent of certain real prqperty eituated in the City of Anaheim,
County af Orange, State of California, descri~d~;ae PATtCEL 1: That portion of the ~ast '•c':'
half of the Northeast quarter of the Northeast quarter of Section 26, Township 4 South,
Range 10 West, as said section is shown on a map thereof recorded in book 51, page•~1Qr.~
Miseellaneous'Ma'ps, rectl=ds o£'said Orange'Cauhty; and`mar~~p'&rtiCUla'~I~y desc'rtb'ed:~-a's Psr-
cel 2 on'a"mep recorded~in Uook 47, page"28~7~o£~PascEr=Mgps~ Yecotde Cinsaid~'0x+8dge County
; and
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at the City Hall in the City of Anaheim
on October 29, 1973, at 2:00 e,'clock P.M., notice of seid public hearing having been duly given as requited
by law end in accordence with the provis!ions of the Anaheim Municipal Cod~e, ChapEer 13.o8,to hear and consider evi-
dence for and against said proposed veri~3nce and to investigate and moke findings end recommendations in connection
therewith; and
WHEREAS, said Commission, al:ter due inspectior., investigation, and study made by itself and in its behal[,
and after due considecation oE all evidence end reports oiEeced at said hescing, does find end detecmine the following
facts:
1. That the petitioner requests a varience fcom the Aneheim Municipal Code:
a. SECTION 18,52.020 - Permi.tted uses, (Retail display and sales facility
not permitted; retail display and sales facility
proposed)
b. SECTION 18.52.060(4) - Minimum required parking. (30 spaces required;
15 spaces proposed)
2. That thece are exceptional or extcaocdinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the property involved
or to the intended use of the property thak do not apply genecallp to the property or class of use in the same vicinity and
zone.
3. That the cequested variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantiel pmperty right
possessed by other property in the same vicinity and zone, and deniru to the propecty in question.
4. Tl~at the requested variance will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the prop-
erty or improvements in such vicinity and zone in which the property is located.
5. That due to the fact that the use proposed is retail sales on a limited basis and
has never been prespnted to the City before, iC shuuld be granted for a period of one year
to determine. whether any adverse eEfects will result, particulatly since the petitioner
stated that he had a one-year lease oci L•he property, and whether this use would establish
an undesir~ble precedent tor similar requests for the industrial areas of the City of
Anaheim.
. -1-
__......._._._.__ _. . . .. . .
---~ _
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ?tEPORT FINDING:
Thpt the Planning Commiss•lon, in connection with an Exemption Deciaration Status requ4st,
finds and detetmines that the proposal wou?d have no significant environmental impact~and,
therefore, recommends to the Cit} Council that no Environmental Tmpact Statement is neces-
sary.
NOW,THEREFORE, 3E IT RESOLVED that the ~rraheim City Planning Commission does hereby
grant subject Petition for Variance, upon the ~ollowing conditions :~hich are hereby found
to be a necessary prerequisite to the proposed use of the subject property in order to
pre~erve the safety and general welfare of the Citf.zens of the City o£ Anaheim:
(1) That subject property shall be developed substantia~.ly in accordance with plans
and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim marked Exhibit No. 1.
(2) That in order to deteLmine whether any adverse effec't will result irom the
granting aaiver of~the parking and the proposed use, the Planning Cocmaission grants a
one-year time limitation, after which time consideration may be given to whether the
waiver of the use and required parking should be extended.
(3) That no free-standing advertising signs shall be permitted.
~'~ . . " ~ .. . .',~~~ ."'. • . ..~ . . , . , . . : .
, ,.:!~ . , .
Ti1E FOREGOiNG RESOLUI'ION is signed and approved by me this $~(~: i d8y; af,~ Noyiembs~`r~,e Z9D3%. •
~/L~'~G1/}~~-~- ' G~~CL~~
CHAIRMAN ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
ATTEST: ,
~ %.~!' `'`~"~ -
SECRE'fARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANG1s ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, Ann K reb s~ Secretary of the City Planning Commission of the City of Mal~eim, do hereby certify that the
foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of the City Planning Commission of the City af Anaheim, hcld on
Octob~e'a~= Q9:f.,.1973:~ , at 2:00 o'clock p.m., by the following vote of the members thPreof:
AYES: COMMISSfONERS: FARANO, GAUER, HERBST, ROWLAND, SEYMOUR.
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE.
ABSENT: COMM1SS10NERS: ALLRE-.
ABSTAIN: CONC'IISSIONERS: KING.
1N WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 8C{~i ddy~.• af~ NovembiRbc4r,~'99:~{: .
~~i~q~'u~---
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CT'fY PLANNING COMMISSION
RESOLU'1'IONNO. PC73-2'38
V2-ll - Z -