PC 73-246~ ~
RESOLUTION NO. PC73-246
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLANNING COI~MISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM THAT
PETITION FOR RECLASSIFICATION NO. ~3-74-24 gE APPROVED
WHER~AS, the City PSenning Commisslon of the City of Anaheim did receive a verlEled Petition Eor Reclesslflcu-
tianfrom ALBERT AND HARUKO UMINO~ 2420 West Broad~~ayn Anaheim, California 92804, Owners;
FOLEY CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, 1681 West Broadway, Suite I, Anaheim, California 92802, Agent
of certain real property situate~i in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of Ca13-
fornia, described as the riorth 369.00 f4et of the east 79.00 feet of the northwest quarter
of the northwest quarter of Section 7, Township 4 Sou::h, Range 10 West, in the Rancho Los
Coyotes, as the northwest quarter of said aection is indicated on a map filed ia Book 11
Page 38 of Record of Surveys, in the office of the County Recorder of said county
; and
WHEREAS, the City Planning Comrt~ission did hold a public hearing et the City Hell in the City of Aneheim on
November 12, 1973, et 2:00 o'clock P.M. notice oE seid public heering heving been duly glven es requlred by
law and in eccordance with the provislons of the Aneheim Municipel Code, Chepter 18.72, to hear and consider evidence
for and ageinst seid proposed reclassification and to Investigate and make findings and recommendetions in connection
therewith; and ,
WHEREAS, said Commission, efter dr.~e inspection, investigetion, and study mede by itselE end in its behalf, and
efter due consldecation of all evldence e;;d reports otfered et seid heering, does find end determine the following fects:
1. Thet the petitioner proposes e reclassificetion of the above described property Ecom the R-A, AGRICiTL'TURAL~
ZONE, to the RS-5000, ONE rAMILY, ZONE.
2. That the proposed reclassification is in conformance with the land use designation
of the General Plan.
3. Thet the preposed reclessificetion oE subject pra~edy is necesseq~ %s~,~/or desirel~le !'c+r ths orderly and pco-
per development of the community.
4. Thet the proposed reclesaification of subject property does pmperly relate to the z~~aes and their permitted
usas locally esteblished in close proximity to subJect property and to the zoneE an~ their permitted' uses generelly esteb-
lfshed throughout the coms~unity.
5, That the proposed ceclasaiticstion of subject property requires the .ledication and
improvemenC of abutting streets in accordance with the Circulation Element ~f the Generel
Plan, due to the anticipated increase in traffic which will bA generated by the intensificu-
tion of land use.
6. That a letter was received from the property owner to the weat of subjett properry
in favor oP the subject recleseification. ~
7. That no one appeared in oppositlon to subject petiCion.
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FINDING:
That the Planning Commission, in connection with an Exemptinn Declaration Status request,
finda and detezmines that the proposal would have no significant environmental impact and,
therefore, recommends to the City Council that no Environmental Impact Statement is necessary.
R-A ~ 1~
NOW, THEREFORE, BE 1'~ESOLVED thet the Aneheim City Planc~ Commissinn does hereby recommend
to the City Council of the City of Anaheim thet subjeet Petition for Reclassification be eppcoved end, by so doing,
thet Title 1&2oning of the Aneheim Municlpel Code be emended to exclude the above desccibed property from the
R-A, AGRICULTURAL, ZONE and to incorporate saLd described property into the RS=50Q0, ONE
FAMT7.Y, ZONE, upon the following condit.ions which are hereby found to be a necessary pre-
requisite to the proposed use of subject propercp in order to preserve the safety a,1d
general welfare of the Citizena of the City of Anaheim:
(1) In the event that subject pxoperty ia to be divided for the purpose of sale, lease,
or financing, a parcel map, to record the approved divieion of subject property, be submiC-
ted to and approved by the City of Anaheim and then be recorded in the office of the Orange
County Recorder.
(2) That sidewalka shal7, be installed along La Paima Avenue as required by the City
Engineer and in accordance with standard plans and specifications on file in the ofFice of
the City Engineer.
(3) That the owner(s) of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the sum of
60 cer.ts per front foot along La Palma Avenue for tree planting purposes.
(4) That street lighting facilities along La Palma Avenue and Mayflower Street chall
be inatalled as required by the Director of Public LTtiiities, and in accordence with stand-
ard pians and specifications on file in the office of the Director of Public Utilities and
that a bond in an amount and form satiafactory to the City of Anaheim shall be postec' with
the City to guarantee the inataTlation of the above mentioned reqairements.
(5) That fire hydrants sheYY be instalYed and charged as required and determined to
be necessary by the Chief of the Fire Department prior to commencement of structural framing.
(6) ThaL sub~ect property shall be served by underground utilities.
(7) That all air conditioning fecilities shall te properly shielded from view, and the
sound buffered from adjacent propertiea.
(S) That drainage of aubJect property shall be dieposed of in a manner satisfactory to
the City Engineer.
(9) That the owner(s) of subject property ahall pay to the City of Anaheim the appro-
priate park and recreation in-lieu fees as deCermined to be appropriate by the City Coun~il,
seid fees to be paid at the time the building perniit is iesued.
(IO) That complel•ion of theae reclassif:cation proceedingo Ls contingent ~pon the grant
ing of Variance No, 2562.
(I1) Prior to the introduction of an ordinence rezoning sub~ect property, Condition
Nos. ~, 3 and 4, above mentioned, ahell be completed, The provieiona or righCs grarted by
•.thia resolution ahall become null and void by action of the Ct.ty Council unless said condi-
tions are complied with within one year from the date hereof, or such further time as the
City CouncLl may grant.
~Y2) That Condition Nos, 2, 6, 7 ar.d 8, above mentioned, shall be complied with prior
co iinal. building and zoning inspections.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is aigned and approv~ by me this 21st day of ovember, 1973
1~ ~
CHAIRMAN ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
AT.TEST:
~i~z~~~-~
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss~
CITY OF ANAHEIN )
I, Ann Kreba, Secretary of the City Plenning Commission ~f'the City oE Anaheim, do hereby certi[y thet
the foregoing iesolution wes pessed and adopted et e meeting of the City Plenning Commission of the City of Aneheim,
held on November :2~ 1973 0~ Z:00 o'clock P.M., by the following vote oE the membecs thereot:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: ALLRED, FARANO, GAUER, KING, ROWi.AND
NflES: C01~MISSIONERS: NONE.
AHSENT: COMMISSIONERS: HERBST, SEYMOUR.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hend this 21at day of November, 1973.
RESOLUTION N0. PC73-246
R2-A
~~~~ ~%~
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLArN1NG COMMISSION
-2-