PC 73-249,:: -`~ ~
RESOLUTIOI~. PC73-249
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION ~ 1434 CgE ENIEDAHEIM
THAT PETITION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission of the City oE Anaheim did receive a verified Petition for Con-
ditional Use Pecmit from CHARLES ANP PATSY CUNDIFF, 314 East lioover, Orange, California 92667,
Owners; LARRY A. BIVENS, 1324 East Chapman Avenue, Orange, California 92666, Agent of
certain real property situated in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of Califor-
nia, described as Lot 14 in Block 36 of the Yorba Linda Tract, as shown on a Map recorded
in book 5, pages 17 and 18 of Miscellaneous Maps, records of Orange County, Califo.rnia.
Excepting therefrom the Northerly 143.52 feet thereof. Also excepting therefrom the
Southerly 180 feet thereof, measured from the center line of Walnut Street
; and
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at the City Hall in the City of Aneheim
on November 26, 1973 at 2:00 o'clock P.M., notice o° said public heacing having been duly given
as cequiced by lew and in accordance with the provisions of tlie Anaheim Municipal code, Chapter 18.64, to hear
and consider evidence for and against seid proposed conditionel use and to invest~gate and make findings and
recommendations in connection therewith; und
WHEREAS, said Commission, aEter due inspection, investigation, and study made by itself and in its be-
hal[, and after due consideret'son of ell evidence and reports offeced et seid hearing, does find and determine the
following facts:
1. That the pcoposed use is properly one far whicS a Conditional Use Permit is authorized by Code Section
18.52.050(a), to establish a recteational vehicle storage yard and caretaker's mobile-
home with waivers of:
a. SECTION 18.52.020 - Permitted buildings strucCures and uses.
(Mobilehome not permitted; mobilehome propor,:~d)
b. SECTION 18.52.060(4-b) - Parking for outdoor uses. (63 spaces required;
12 seaces propc;sed)
2'. That ennexation of sub~ect property :tas been initiated by the petitioner and is
zoned County M1 ~iith a re~olution of intent t~ City of Anaheim M-1 and the Scenic Corri-
dor (SC) Overlay Zone.
3. TliaC the proposed use would be contrary to the intent and projections as estab-
lished in the Scenic Corridor Overlay (SC) 'Lone, which prohibits mobilehome parks ar,d
auto and truck storage.
4. That the proposed use would estabCiSZ nedangerous precedent for simiiar requests
or uses in the Scenic Corridor Overl~y:( )
5. That botli the County of Orange and the SCate of California have esta~iia.`.:.d tF.c
SC Zone boundaries ss delineated in the City of Anaheim Sdenic Corridor (SC) Zone £or
Santa Ana Canyon, and any deviation by t?~e City would not be an act of good faith with
the other jarisdictions.
6. 'ihat the proposed use will adversely affpct the adjoining land uses and the
t of the area in which it is proposed ro be located,
growth and developmen
7. '!'tiat the grantit~F o[ the Conditional Use Permit under the conditions imposed, if
anyS will Ue detrimental l:o the peace, healtti, safety, and general welfare of the Citizens
of the City of Anaheim.
. ~. _1_
~
~ ,. -r'
~ ~
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FINDING:
That the Planning Comaission, in connection with an Exemption Declarati.on Status request, finds
and determines that the proposal would have no significant environmental impact and, therefore,
recommends to the City Conncil that no Environmental Impact Statement is necessary.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Aneheim City Planning Commission does hereby deny subJect
Petition for Conditionel Use Pemut on the basis of the aforementioned findings.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTI~~N is signed and epproved by me this 6th day of December, 1973.
' `\..
~' , '/l~1-.~
CHAIRMAN ANAHEIM CITy PLANNING COMMISSION
ATTEST:
% ~E.~~Lt-C~c-c~~~ X7~Q~c~
SECP,ETARY/ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING C0;4IMISSION
PRO TEM
STATE OF CAL:FORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANG~ ) ss. , '
CITY C^ ANAHEII~1 )
SecreLar• s+- , ;~tr.
I, Patricia;- Scanlan, /~~ af th~: ~.•,.c~ ,rL'nn•ri~~g Commission of the Ciry of Anaheim, do heceby certify that the fore-
going resolutioc was passed and ac~a~,c~d at s meeting of the City Plnnning Commission of the City of Anaheim, held on
November 26, 1973, et 2:UP t~'clock P.M., by the following vofe of the members theceof:
AYES: COMMISSIONEFS: ALLR~D, FARANO, GAUER, KING, SEYMOUR,
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: HEREST.
:,BSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE.
ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: ROWLAND.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I heve heceunto set my hand this 6th day of December, 1973.
/r~ '4tit/!-~• P"~~~CL~W~ _
SECRETARY/ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
PRO TEM
RESOLUTION NO. PC73-249
C2-D "2'