Loading...
PC 73-36~ ~ ~ RESOLUTION NO. PC73-3b A RESOLUTION OF THE C1TY PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHETtd RECO1dMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY aF ANAHEIM THAT PETITiON FOR RECLASSIFICATION N0. 72"~3"32 BE P.PPROVED WHEREAS, the City Plenning Commission of the City of Anaheim did cecelve a verified Petition for Reclassifica- tion(rom LIBERTY LEASING, INCORPORATED, Post Office Box 314, Yorba Linda, Cslifornia 92686, Owner of certain real property situated in the City of Anaheim, County of Orarige, State of California, described as Seginning at a point in the westerly line of said lot, :aid poin~ being diatant along said westerly line Southerly, 38.57 feet from the norCherly Lerminus of that certain course having a length oF 1715.93 fee~ on the map of Tract No. 4643 recorded in Book 7.95, pages 35, 36 and 37 of Miscellaneous Maps in said affice, said painc also being the westerly terminus of the certain course having the bearing of N 73° 29' 33" E 3n Parcel 2 of the State Highway Relinquishment No. 637 recorded in Book 8943, pages 261 end 262 of Official Records in said office; thence along the norther.ly line of said Parcei 2, N 73° 29' 33" E, 405.90 feet; thence leaving said northerly li.ne N 43° 59' 29" W, 10.86 feet; thencQ N 46° 58' 05" W, 255.88 feet to the northerly line of said lot; thence Westerly, Southwesterly and Southerly along the boundaries of said lot to the point of beginning ; end WHEREAS, the City Plenning Comrt~ission did hold a public hearing at the City Hell in the City of Aneheim on February 21.i 1973, nt 2:00 o'clock P.M. notice of seid public hearing heving been duly given as required by law and ln accordance with the provisions o( the Aneheim Municlpel Code, Chapter 18.72, to heer end consider evldence for end egainst seid pioposed reclassificetian end to investlgate end meke findings and cecommendetions in connection therewith; end WHEREAS, seid Commission, after due inspec4ion, investigation, end study mede by itsel,f end in its behalf, end efter due rnnsideration of ell evidence end reports offered et seld hearing, does find end determine the following fects: 1. That the petitioner proposes e reclessificetion of the ebove described propedy from the R-A, AGR1~ClTLTURAL, ZONE to the C-1, GENERAL COMMERCIAL, ZONE. 2. That the proposed reclassification is not in conformance with the land use designa- tion of the General Plan, however, it would be coneistent with the zoning on the adjacent property at the corner of Tustin Avenue and Riverdale Avenue. 3. Thet the proposed ceclassificetion of subject property is necessery and/or desirable Eorthe orderly and pro- per development of the community. 4. That the proposed ceclessificetion of subject property doea properly relate to the zones and their permitted uses locelly esteblished in close proximity to subject property end to the zones end their permltted uses generally esteb- lished lhroughout the community. 5. That the proposed reclassification of subject property requires the dedication and improvement of a~utting streetr~ in accordance with the Circu!s~ion Elcr.•,:~nt of the General Plan, due to the anticipated increase in traffic which will be generat~d by the intensifi- cation of land use. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FINDING: That the Ylanning Commission, in connection with an Exemption Declaration Status request. finds and determines that the proposal would have no significant environmental impact and, therefore, recommends to the City Council that no Environmental Impact Statement is ner,es- sary. R-A "1" . I~ • NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOL~'ED that the An&heim City Planair.g Cocamission daes he+:•eby recommend to the City Council of the City of Anaheim that scbject Petition tor R2~::Yasaifi~ cation be approved and, by so doing, that Titie 18-2uni~r.g of the Anaheim Municipal Code be amended to exclude the above described propexty fsom the R-A, AGRICULTU~.~b, ZONE and t6 incorporate said described property into the C-1, GENERAL COMMECtC7AL, ?.OtiE upon the follow- ing conditions which are hereby found to be a necessary prereguisite to the psopcased use of subject propercy in order ta preserve the safety and general welfare of the Citizens of the City of Anaheim. (1) That street lighting facilities alon~ Riverdale Avenue shall be instatl~d as re- q+.iired by the Director of Public Utilities and in acc~rdance with standard p7.ans xnd speci- fications on file in the office of the Director of Public Utilities; and ehet a bond in an amount and form satisfactory to the City of Anaheim shall. be posted with the Ci*_y :o guargn- L-ee the installation of the above mentioned requirement. (2) That trash storage areas shall be provided in accordance with approved p~ans on file with the offi.ce of the Director of Public Warks. (3) That fire hydrants sha11 be installed and charged as required and detec~~+,.~%d tu be necessary by the Chief of the Pire Department prior to commencement of structur.Z iramitig. (4) That all air conditioning facilities shall be properiy shieldecl xrom vir.w, ,~i:~d the sound buffered from adjacent properties. (S) That subject property shall be served by underground util:ti~s, (6) That drainage of subject property shall be disposed of ia a manr,!'r ~:iac is satis- facrory tn the City Engineer and the Oxange i:ounty Flood Control District. (7) That appropriate water assessment fees as determined by the Direccor of Public Utilities shall be paid to the City of Anat~eim prior to the issuance of a building permit (8) That subject property shall be developed aubstantially in conformattce with ple~~s and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim marked Exhibit Nos. 1 and 2 provided, however, that access to Tustin and Riverdale Avenuea shall be approved by the Cily Engineer, (9) Prior to thP introduction of an ordinance rezoning subject property, Condition No:, , 1, above mentioned, shall be comple[ed. The provisions or rigbts granted by this resalutLon shall become null and void by action cf the City Council unlesa said condition is complied with within one year from the date hereoi or such fuather time as the City Council may grant. (10} That Condition Nos. 2, 4, 5, 6, and S, above mentioned, shall be complied with prior to final building and zoning inspections. THE FOkEGOING RESOLUTION is aigned and( approved~y me this 'i~t~day of Merch, 1973. ~ ATTEST: ~ L'~~ %~i "`~" _ SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING CONAtISSION STATE OF CALIF6RNIA ) COUNTY OP ORANGE ) ss. CITY OF ANAHEIM ) It Ann. Krebs, Secretary of the City Plnnning Commission of the City of Anaheim, do "~iereby certify that the foregoing resolution was passed aad adopted aC a meeting of the City Plsn- ning Commission of the City of Anaheim, held on February 21, 1973, at 2:00 o°clack P.M., Ly the following vote of the merabers thereof: AYES: COI~AIISSIONERS: ALLRED, FARANO, GAUER, HERSST, KAYWOOD, ROWLAND, SEYMOUR, NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE, ADSENT: COrTSISSIQNERS: NONE. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this lst day of March, 1973. ~~Q~~~' `.v" - SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION N0. PC73-36 '2-