PC 73-40~~ „ , ~
RESOLUTION NO
pC73-40
~
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLANNING COMMiSSION Oi ?ftE CITY OF ANAHEIM
THAT PETITION FOR CONDITIaNAL USE PERMIT BE DENIED
WHIEREAS, the City Plunning Commission of the City of Anaheim did receive a vecified Petition for Con-
ditionalUse Pecmitfrom HIROSHI FU7ISHIGE, 1854 South Harbor Boulevard, AnahAnaheim~1Calii~
92802~ Owner~ JOHN A. DE FALCO AND ASSOCIATES~ 1720 West La Palma, "B"~ e
fornia 92801, Agent of certain real property situared~in the City of Anaheim, County of
Orange, State of California, as dascribed in Exhibit A attached hereto and referred to
herein as though set forth in full
; and
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did hold e public hearing et the City Hell in the City of Anaheim
on February 21, 1973, et 2:00 o'clock P.M., notice of said public hearing having been duly given
es requiced by law and in accordance with the pcovisions of the Anaheim Municipal code, Chapter 18.64, to hear
ana consider evidence for and against said proposed conditionel use and to investigate and maka findings and
recommendations in connection therewith; and
WHEREAS, said Commission, after due inspectioa, investigetion, and study made by itself and in its br
half, and after due consideration of all evidence and roports ofEeced ct said heeeing, does find and determine tne
following facts:
1. That thet~roWita u establish antravell trailer~tparkU with waiverhofzed by Code Section
18,64.020(2-d)
SECTION 18.85.OlOlA) - Minimum special setback along iiarbor Boulevard.
(50 feet required; 20 feet proposed)
2. That the proposed use would be a blight in this area of highrise hotels and other
high quality commercial-recreation developrrent.
3. That the view ~f the propaoed use from adjoining hotels would be undesirable.
4. That this particular part of the commercial-recreation area does not lend its~lf
to the proposed type of use. ~
5. That although the proposal is a desirable one, it is proposed to be located in
l-he wrong area.
6. That the proposed use will adversely affect the adjoining land uses and the growth
and development of the area in which it is ~roposed to be located.
7. ';hat one person appeared representing owners of an adjoining high rise hotel in
opposition Co the proposed use.
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FINDING:
That the Planning Commission, in connection with an Exemption Declaration SLatus request,
finds and determines that the proposal would have a significant environmental impact and,
therefore, recommends to the City Council that an Environmental Impact Reporl- be required
prior to consideration of any action on subject pr~perty by the City'Council.
-1-
CI-D
~ ' i_,.
' ~ , ~ ~ .~.-r---- -.--------~. ~ .
,'
~ ~~~~~~~~'~' ~~~~~ ~ .
. - ~ SG~~~~.~ .~
T;!e estate or interest in the lnnd described or referred to in tlus'scl~edule covered by this report ise .
, , . a Pee
'Tit;e to said estate or intcrest nt di~ date hereof is vested in: '. '
tilISAO PUJISii~Qr., a r~.rrie;:: m^n, Vr~o acquir~d title as s ain~,lo btin~ by Qeed
recorcied FJove ~iber 29, 197~~ iii boo~c 2SGl, pat~s: 14), Ufficlt~l Iiecoxd~, as to
ari undividoQ dne-t~ulf Sa~erest, :.~ncl FiII?QSFiI I~UJISLiIGi;, a warrl~ed s~any :aho
acquired titl° a~ a nine,le: ~~¢in, Uq deed recor~lec~ id~rch I3a 19~1 in book
~G>4, ga~~ 3~5, Uf:ic1G1 lZecords, a~ to ar: undividcd onc-halt in~erest, as
to Parcelu 1 to ~I inclu33vc; wid F,iASr-o ru.rxsalGL, u..,~.rri.ed m:~n; and •
i{l'ROuHI l?UJSSiiIG~, a re;:rried r~an, by deea rer.orde~! Septen~ber 20p 19oF3 in
boo.•: $72G, p~r;e 704, Ufi'icial I?ecurda, ~:l~ieli reci~es a,s' their .3epnrate
praperty, eacn L~ to a orie-1i;•Llt iritez~e~t, tin ~o Parael 5. ,
~'!~e lnnd refened to in this report is situated in tlie State of California, County of p~ ~ge
und is described as £ollows: ..
All ~hat certn.ln real property situaL•ed 3n 8he R:u~-etio Stsn ,Tut~n Cajon
de SanG~ • A:ra, City~ ~of P~nat~eir, Cou'r:by of Ora:~;5c, .~L-ats ot Ca1~Porn9.a,
a3 uho~rn oii r~ r~~p L•tiereof recorded in bool: ~l, ~~a~;e 7, eL- seq., t~.i~cel-
• iru7eous 1~1np~, record~ vt saia Uran~.;~ Gount;y, cie:~os•ibeC#~ in parcelu aa
i ollatas : .
PAHCL•'L l: ' Soubn h:il£ of ti~r. ,iorth27a3~ quaxL•er ::t the tiortheas~ qu~rter
' oP Section 2'j, irz in:rtiship ~I Sottth~ HastF;e 10 l~esab.
B~CEPT the I•iortherly 120.00 feeL- of the ~Ie~taz•lq G6U.00 :co~ theroof.
1'AIiCTL 2: 2dorthuest qu~rter o£ ti~e Southw~st quartcr•of ~he 2•lorthea:,t
quartc:r of Sect3ori 27, iri 5C01lIiuiiip 4 Soutt~, Jianl;e 10 1•le~t.
°ARCiiL 3: Sautnifest• r~tk3i~tcr of tiie I~orL•hensb qu,trter of the 2iorbhe~iat
qu~rL•er of SeeLion ~7, lr~ ~ot•~ra}iip ~{ Sout;:,, R:inL~ 1G lyeat. .
FRI:Cb'L ~!: Yaortt,vreat; quaxcer of tiic uoutiie~ist quarber oi thc ?Jor~he~ati
quarter o~ 5ect•Son 2(, in 'lotu;~hip 4 Soutn, hun;;c 10 t~lcat.
i:riC.:Pazlici Tltt"sI',Si)~Y,O?a n:z unat~i~:ea 3/5 int<~rast• in u piece o~ lanci $0
Peet nquare lyin;; S:•1 ti:e i~oarL•h~aesL• cornc~r a~' aai.d P:~rccl ~{.
PlIJiCLT,' S: t~orL-licc~at quui~ter oi' tn~: :Ollih%~1en* quit7.^L'~:X' ol.' tihe ldortheust
~u,aiLer of Seutioti 27, in 'xu~rr:shij+ 4 Sout-h, it~ir~~;.e 10 ti7e~t. •
:~iU•iL; ~.~ P~trcel~ 1 to 4 inclus:Lve; nre sha:~rn as P~rcel "Ii" vii n rna~ i'iled
Oc:t•o~er 1`.i, 1~G3 i:~ bov}: 17, )~~r:f•;c 42 ui' Pr~rccl l~at~s.
~'f'7 ' „ .~~, l ; ; ~,,
n' ` ~,t~~,~'~ -i, . ~ ~j, ~', .
c~?. . ~~! l,;~r.a{'~1 ~I.:i', Pfrri~I~~~T `~~~, ~ J a
`\`' <, i , ,. ~ " . . .. . ~ .
r~iid r' ~(~'.s ~... ~.~..~.,... _~._.~ o^ ~
~
~ . .' ~ ~
" LEGAL DESCRIPTION "
Commencing at the centerline intsrsection of Katella Avessus
and Harbor poulevard, .as shown on a map filed in book 43,
page 33 of Record of Surveys in the office of the County
Recorder of said Orange County; thence South 1° 21' 00" ,.
', East along the' centerline of Said Harbor Boulevard a distance
of 1232.61 feet; thence t7orth BB° 39' 00," East a distance
of 60.00 feet to the true point of beginning.
Thence N O1° 21' 00" W a distance of 450 feet to the SS~
corner of teh Holiday Inn property; thence N E39° 44' 26" E
a distance of 600,13 feet to the SE cur.ner of the Itoliday Inn
property; thence N 0° 15' 34" t4 a distance of 120.03 feet; '
thence N 89° 44' 26" ~ a distance of 900 feet to a point on
the centerline of Clementine Street; thence along the centerlin~
of Clementine Street, being a 90 foot street, 45 feet each
side of this centerline S 15° 17' 22" T4 a distance of
~~~ -~}-6~eeE~-tience ~.ong a~~curve being concaved Southeasterly
~(-w•~~cv-'C' with a radius of 1000 feet, through a central an le o ';p :, f'T
15° 32' S6" at arc distancc of 271.38 feet; thence S 0° 15'
, 34" E a distance of 85.00 Feet to the intersection of the centerline
of Clementine Street and Conver.tion t9ay; thence along the
centerline af Convention Nay, being a 120 foot street, 60 foot
each sid n{ this centerline S 88° 44' 2G" W a distance of. 76:00
~ eet; thence along a~curve being concaved Southeasterly and
having a radius of 1200 feet, through a central anqle of ~ Q(~~ZL+
13° 14' 33" an are dictance of 277.35~nee aloncT a eurve
being concaved Plorthwesterly and having a radius of 1200 feet, ~,~ Q p~-
through a central angle of 13° 14' 33" an arc distance of 277.35;
thence'S 89° 44' 26" SV a distance of 765.00; thence N 0° 15' 34"
~ IV•:a •distance of 60.00 ft; thence along a curve being concave ~T-"~~'
Northeasterly and having a radius of 25 feet through a central
angle o£ E38° 59' 34" an azc distance of 38.79`to the true
point of beginning. ~lA.a Pr
The a£orementibned~centerline description of Convention l~ay
and Clementine Street are subject to tlie approval of t}~e
City of Anaheim.
;~2y?.C,?T ~\.
' ~~ ~~ ~ ~ ,,,~.
~~~`' J F(•11:;73 ~ `~
;•;
i~:
,i :;~}.:y~•.:.~
=' ~:;•sitco
lr :.
~•, ; ;r.vc°::~..rr
' --~..''~~'~~~
~t~.~~~~i.I, :.~~ii: e'~4:.:~i~;f i :i:J. ~ J~ ~ _ ...
a , • ~ ~
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED thet the Aneheim City Plenning Coinmission does hareby deny subJect
Petition for Conditional Use Permit on the basis of the aforementioned findings.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is signed and epproved by me thi~lst day of~•t~rch, 1973.
CIT%
ATTEST:
~~~~
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss•
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, Anri, Krebo, Secretary of the City Plenning Commission of the City oE Anaheim, do hereby certify that the fore-
r-sing cesolution was pessed and adopted at a meeting of the Ciry Pttmning Commission of the City of Anaheim, held on
February 21, 1973, at 2:00 o'clock P.M., by the toliowing vote oE the members thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: ALLRED, FARANO, GAUER, HERBST, KAYWOOD, SEYMOUR,
NOES: COMMISSIONGRS: NONE,
ABSENT: COMMISSIdNERS: NONE.
ASSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: ROWLAND.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hend this lst day of March~ 1973.
RESOLUTION NO. PC73-40
~~~ ~~,~/
-~'~~ 7
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSiON
C2-D 'Z'