PC 73-55. ~ ~
RESOLUTION N0. PC73-55
A RESULUTION OF THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSICN OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
RECOMMENDIIJG TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF TF?E CITY OF ANAHEIM THAT
PETITION FOI2 RECLASSIFICATION NO. 72"~3"3~ BE APPHOVED
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim did initiate a. verified PeCition
£or Reclassification for certain real p=operCy situated in the City of Anaheim, County
of Orange, State of California, described as Lots 1 through 7 of Tract No. 2300
RECURDED PROPERTY OWNERS:
Ellis Schrader, Incorporated, 1637 South Euclid Street, Anaheim, California 92802
Doug Browne, 967 Ambridge Avenue, Anaheim, California 92806
teter R. TaiC, 618 S~uth S~ate College Boulevard, Anaheim, California 92806
Joseph J. Gorski, Jr., 56~ So.uth State College Boulevard, Anaheim, California 92806
Ferne D. Jackson, 201 La Plaza,'Anaheim, California 92805
Rajeadra G. Desai, 1202 Hyde Park Drive, Santa Ana, California 927C5
; end
WI?EREAS, the City Plenning Commission did hold a public hearing et the Ci:y Hell in the City of Aneheirt~ on
March 19, 1973, at 2:00 o'clack P.M. notice oE seid public hearing having been duly given es required by
law and in accordance with the proviszons oE the Anaheim Municipal Code, Chapter 18.72, to heer end consid?r evidence
for and against said pioposed reclassification end to investigete and meke findings and recommendations in connection
tharewith; and
WHEREAS, said Commission, ofter due inspection, investigation, end study mede by itself and in its behelf, and
efter due consideretion of all evidence end reports of[eced et seid hearing, does find and dr,termine the following fects:
1. Thet the petitioner pcoposes e reclassiEication Af the above described property Ecpm the F,-1, ONS FAMILY
R~SSDENTIAL, ZONE to the C-1, GENERAI. COMMERCIAL, ZONE.
2. That rhe proposed reclassification s.•ould be in conformance wi':h the land use des-
ign~tion oi the General Plan.
3. That the propused reclassification of subject property is necessery end/or desirable far the orderly end pro-
per development of the community.
4. Thet the pcoposed reclessification of subject property does properly retete to the zones end their permitted
uses locally established in close ptoxlmity t~ sut+ject property end to the zones end their permitted uses ~enerally esteb-
lished throughout the commur,ity.
5. ThaC the proposed reclassification of subject property requires the dedicat~.on and
improvement of abutting sCreets in accordance wiCh the Circulation Element of the General
Plan, due to the anticipated increase in traffic which will be generated by Che intensifica-
tion of land use.
6. ThaC A.D.P. No. 111 was coneidered in connection vrith this proposed Reclassification.
7. That Cwo persons, owning three of the parcels, appeared to present their views on
the proposed reclassification.
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FINDING:
ThaC the Planning Commission, in connection with an Exemption Declaration Status request,
finds end determines that the proposal would have no significant environmertal impact and~,
L•herefore, recommends to the City Council that no Environmental Impact Statement is necessary.
=1-
w vOjd, THEREFORE, BE IT~SOLVED that the Anaheim City PI°anning Commission does hereby
re•-mmend to the CiCy Council of the City of Anaheim that subject Petition for Reclassifica-
ti~n be approved and, by so doing, that Title 18-Zoning of the Anaheim Municipal Code be
amended to exclude the above described property from the R-1, ONE FAMILY RESI~ENTIAL, ZONE
and Co incorporate said described property into the C-1, GENERAL CU!)IItERCIAL, ZONE upon the
following conditions which ar.e hereby found to be a necessary prerequisite to the proposed
use of subject property in order to preserve the safety and general aelfare of the Citizens
of the City of Anaheim:
(1) That the owner(s) o.f subject property shall deed to the of Anaheim a strip of
land 53 fee~ in wi3th from the centerline of the street along SCate College Boulevard £or
street widening purposes.
(2) That the vehicular access rights to State College Boulevard shall be dedicated to
the City of Anahei~.
(3) T.hat specific plans for any proposed development or remodeling on the property
shall be submitted to the Planning Commiss:on and City Council for approval.
(4) That rhe existing sCructure shall be brought up to the min'.mum standards of the
City of Anaheim including the Yniform Buil3ing, Plumbing, Electrical,,Housing, Mechanical
and Fire Codes as adcpted by the City of Anaheim.
(5) That the garages shall be removed from the rear uf the prop~rty in order Co pro-
vide adequate parking and turn around area.
(6) That Crash storage areas shall be provided in accordance with approved plans on
file with the office of the Director of Yublic Works.
(7) That all air conditioning facilities shall be properly shielded from view, and
the sound buffered from adjacent properties.
(8) That any parking area lighting proposed shall be down-lighting of a maximum
height of six feet, which lighting shall be directed away from the property lines to pro-
tect the residential integrity of *he area.
(9) That the final parking plan shall be approved by the Development Services Depart-
ment, and any landscaped areas in the perking area shall be protected with six-inch high
concrete curbs, and concrete wheel stops shall be provided for parking spaces.
(10) That a six-foot masonry wall shall be constructed on the R-1 Zoned property on
the east side of the alley directly opposite the subject parcels if the R-1 homeowners con-
sent to the construction of said wall. If the R-1 homeowners do not consent Co Che wall
being located on their property, the owner(s) of sub~ect property shall be absolved of the
responsibility for constructing such a wall.
(11) Prior ;o the introduction of an ordinance rezoning subjeet property, Condition
Nos. 1, 2, and 3, iabove mentioned, shall be completed. The provisions or rights granted by
this resolution shall become null and void by action of the City Council unless said condi-
tions are complied with within one year f~om the date hereof, or such £urther time as the
City Council. may grant.
(12) That Condition Nos. 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, and 10, above mentioned, shall be complied
with p~ior to final Uuilding and zoning inspections:
(13) That ordinances reclassifying the ~roperty shall be adopted as each parcel is
ready Co cupply with conditions pertaining to such parcei provided, however, thaY the word
"parcel" shall mean presently existing percels of record and any parcel or. parcels approbed
by Che City Council for lot sp'.~.t.
THF. POREGOING RESOLUTION 1s s
ATTEST:
SECRETARY ANG1iEIM CITY PLANNING COMMI55IC~N
STATB OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTF ~F ORANGE ) S8.
CITY OF A2dAHEIM )
I, Ann Krebs, Secretary of the City Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim, do
hereby certiEy that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of the
City Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim, held on March 19, 1973, at 2:00 ~'clock
p.m., by the following vote of tYie members thereof:
AYGS: COMMISSIONERS: ALLRED, FARANO, HERBST, KAYWOOD, ROWLAND, SEYh40UR,
NOES: COMMISSIONERr: GAUER.
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 29th day oi March, 1973.
SECRETARY AiVAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
RESOLUTION N0. PC73-55
- 2-