PC 73-92~ ~
RESOLUTION NO. PC73-92
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLANNING COM~SISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
THAT PETITION FOR VARIANCE N0. 2503 BE GRANTED
WHEF:EAS, the City Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim did receive a verified Petition for Variance
Erom LOETTA SUE MANLEY (JEANSON), 1114 Chaucer Street, Anaheim, California 92806, Owner;
RAYMOND H. JEANSON, 1114 Chaucer Stre~t•, Anaheim, California 92806, Agent of certain real
proFerty situated in the City af Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California, described
as Lot 31 of Tract Na. 6531, as per map recorded in Book 242, pages 10 and 11, of Miscel-
laneous Maps, in the otfice of the Recorder of said Orange County
. ; and
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at the City Hall in the City of Anaheim
on May 14, 1973, at 2:U0 o'clock F.M., notice of seid public heacing having been duly given as required
by law and in accordenae viith the pcovisions ~f the Anaheim Municipal Code, Chapter 18.68,to hear end consider
evidence Eor end ugainst'seid proposed veriance end to ir:vestigete and meke findings and recommendstions in couneo-
tion therewith; and "
WHEREAS, said :Commission, after due inspection, investigetion, end ~tudy made by itself end in its behelf,
and after due consideiation of all evidence end repocts offered at said hearing, doec find and determine the follnwing
facts: •
. 1. That the'petitionec requests a variance from the Anaheim Municipel Code:
SECTION 18.26.050 3 - Covera~e and Oaen Space requirements. ~(35% maximum
lot coverage allowed; 44.5/ coverage proposed)
2. That thece are exceptional or extraocdinery circumstences or conditions appliceble to the property involved
or to the intended use of the property that do not apply generally to the property or clasa oE use in the same vicinity
and zone. ~
3. Thet the requested variance is necessary for the pceservation and e~ijoyment of e substantial pcoperty right
possessed by other pcopecty in the seme vicinity and zone, and denied to the propecty in auestion.
4. That the requested variance will not be met¢rially deirimental to the public welfaze or injurious to the p~op-
erty or impcovements in such vicinity and zone in whic;i the property is loceted.
iNVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FINDING:
That the Planning Commission, in connection with,an Exemption Declaration Status request,
finds and determi:tes that the pxoposal would have .o significant environmental impact and,
therefore, recommends to the City Council that no Environmental Impact Statement is neces-
sary.
V 1-G ' 1-
~
~
~ ~
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning Commission does hereby gcant subjact
Petition for Variance, upon the following conditions which ece hereby found to be a necessary pcecequisite to the pro-
posed use of the subject proparty in order to pceserve the safety end generel welfare of the Citizens of the City of
Anaheim: ,
(1) That subject property shall be developed subatantially in accordance with plans
and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim marked Exhibit No, 1.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTTON !s si~ed and approved by m~ thia ,~4rh day~o.f~tay, 1973.
ANAHEIM CITY Pl,Pdj~l~13G COMMISSION~ ~ ~
ATTEST:
G!~2~ /~~y'2.~G~/ I .
SECRETARY ANAHEQYI CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUN7'~ OF ORANGE ) ss•
CTTY OF ANAHEIM )
I, Ann Krebs~ Secretary of the City Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim, do hereby certify thet
the focegoing resolution was pessed end adopted at a meeting of the City Plenning Commission of the City of Ansheim,
held on May 14, 1973 nt 2:00 o'clock P.M., by the following vote of the menbers thereoE:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: ALLRED, FARANO, GAUER, HERBST, FiOWLAND, SEYMOUR.
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: KAYWOOD.
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto aet my hand this 24th day o£ May~ 1973.
C~~~~/r~.~`~-`
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMIS5ION
RESOLUTION N0. PC73-92
V2-G '2"