PC 75-126~ ' ~ ~
RESOLUTION N0. PC75-126
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE C1TY OF ANAHE111
RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM THAT
PETITION FOR RECLASSIFICATION N0. 74-7">-34 BE APPROVED.
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim did receive a
verified Petition for Reclassification from KENNETH A. AND BETTY J. NELSON,
1651 East Fourth Street, Santa Ana, Ca,lifornia 9z701 and ARIJEL DEVELOPMENT
COMPANY, GEORGE L. ARGYROS, 1651 East Fourth Street, Santa Ana, California 92701
(Owners); POMONA FIRST FEDERAL SAVINGS E LOAN ASSOCIATION, P. 0. Box 2768,
Pomona, California 91766 (Agent) of certain real property situated in the City
of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California, described as:
That portion of Lot 1 of Tract No. 6646, as shown on a Map recorded in book 249,
pages 38 and 39 of Miscellaneous Maps, records oT Orange County, California,
described as follows:
Parcel 1, as shown on a map filed in book 27, page 32 of Parcel Maps in the
office of the County Recorder of said Orange County.
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did schedule a public hearing at the
City Hall in the City of Anaheim on June 9, 1975, at 1:30 p.m., notice of said
public hearing having been duly given as required by law and in accordance wEth
the provisions of the Anaheim t4unicipal Code, Chapter 18.G3, to tiear and consider
evidence for and against said proposed reclassification and to investigate and
make findings and recommendations in connection therewith; said public hearing
having been continued to the Planning Commission meeting of June 23, 1975; and
WHEREAS, said Commission, after due inspection, investigation and study made
by itself and ir, its behalf, and after due consideration of all evidence and
reports offered at said hearing, does find and determine the following facts:
1. That the petitioner proposes reclassification of the above-described property
from the RM-1200 (RESIDENTIAL, MUL1'iPLE-F~MILY) ZONE to the CL (COMMERCIAL, LIMITED)
ZON'c.
2. That the Anaheim General Plan designates subject property for medium-density
residential uses.
3. That the proposed reclassification of subject property is necessary and/or
desirable for the orderly and proper development of the community.
4. That the proposed reclassification of subject property does properly relate to
the zones and their permitted uses locally estahlished in close proximity to subject
property and to the zones and their permitted uses generally established throu9hout
the community.
5• That thP petitioner stipulated to terminatin9 Reclassificatio~i No. 69-70-5,
which was previously filed on subject property.
6. That no one indicated their presence at said public hearing in opposition,
and no correspondence was received in opposition to subject petition.
EN4IRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FINDING:
That the Planning Commission recommends [o the City Council that the subJect
pro)ect be exempt fr~m the requirement to prepare an Environmental {mpact Report,
pursuant to the pravisions of the California Environmental Quality Act.
NOW, 7HEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning Commission does
hereby recommend to the City Council of the City of Anaheim that subject Petition
for Reclassification be approved and, by so doing, that Title 18-Zoning of the
Anaheim Municipal Code be amended to exclude the above describ~d property from the
RM-1200 (RESIDENTIAL, MULTIPLE-FAM~LY) ZONE and to incorporate said d~scribed
property into the CL (COMHERCIAL, LIMITED) ZONE upon the fallowing conditions which
are hereby found to be a necessary prerequisite to r,he proposed use of subJect
property in order to preserve the safety and general welfare of the Citizens of
the City of Anaheim:
rti~ .
!
~
~
1. That the owner(s) of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the
sum of $2,OQ per front foot along State College Boulevard for street lighting
purposes.
2. That trash storage areas shall be provided in accordance with approved
plans on file with the office of the Director of Public Works.
3• That approprtate water assessment fees as determined by the Director of
Public Utilities shall be paid to the City of Anaheim prior to the issuance of a
building permit.
4. That only one driveway shall fie allowed to State College Boulevard for the
subject property; said driveway to be aligned with Almont Avenue on the east side
of State College Boulevard, as approved by the City Engineer.
5. 7hat subject property shall be served by underground utilities.
6. That a six-foot masonry wall shall be constructed along the west property
line; provided, however, if such a wall presentty exists alr,ng said property line
on the adjacent property, an additional wall shall not be required,
7. That drainage of subject property shall be disposed of in a manner satis-
factory to the City Engineer.
8. That all air-conditioning facilities shall be properly shielded from view
and the sound buffered from adjacent properties.
9. That subject property shall be developed substanrially in accordance with
plans and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim marked Exhibit Nos. 1
and 2.
10. Prior to the introduction of an ordinance rezoning subject property,
Condition No. 1, above-mentioned, shall be completed. The provisions or rights
granted by this resolution shall become rcull and void by action of the City Council
unless said condition is complied with within one (1) year from the date hereof, or
such further time as the City Council may grant.
11. 'fhat Condition Nos. 2, 4, 5, 6, 7, S and 9, above-mentioned, shall be
complied with prior to final building and zoning inspections.
THE FOREGOfNG RESOLUTION is signed and p~ ved by e this 23rd day of June, 1975.
' ,' i~~
~
CHAIRMAN PRO TEMPORE
ATTEST: ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
~~ . ~ ~~~~~~
SECRETARY, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY CF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, Patricia B. Scanlan, Secretary of the City Planning Commission of the City
of Anaheim, do herehy certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted
at a meeting of the City Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim,.held on June 23,
1975, at 1:30 p.m., by the following vote of the members thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: GAUER, JOHNSON, KING, MORLEY, TOLAR, FARANO
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT; COMMISSIONERS: HERBST
IN WITNESS WHEREOP, I fzave hereunto se my hand this 23rd day of June, 1975.
~
SECRETARY, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNiN~ COMMIS510N
-2- RESOLUTION N0. PC75-126