PC 75-139~ ~
RE50LUTION N0, PC75-139
A RESOLUTION OF THE CIfiY PLANNING COMNLtSS20N OF THF' C~iT OF ANAHEIM
THAT PETITION FOR VARIADTCE NOe 2707 BE GRAP]TEDo
WI~REAS, the City Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim did receive a
veri£ied Petition for ~Terience from GLETTN M, ALLDER, 865 Redondo Drive East, Anaheim,
Ca. 92801 (O~vner) of certein real property situated in the City of Anaheim, County
of Orange, State of Celifornia, described as:
Lot 36, of Traot No. 1460, in i•~he City of Anaheim, as shovm on a map theraof recorded
in Book 46, pagas 2 and 3, Miscellaneous 1uIaps, records of sai3 Orange County; and
WElEREAS, the City }~lanning Cnmmission did hold a public hFering at the City Hall
in the City o~ Anahei_: on June 23, 1975, 8'~ 1:30 p.m., notioe of said public hearing
having been duly giver:+ss required by lew and in accordanae with the provisions of
the Anahei.m Muniaipal ~ode, Chepter 18.03, to hear and aonsider evidence for and'ageinst
said proposed varianne end to investigate and mako firidings and recommendetions in
oonnention therewith; end
Wf~REAS, seid Co¢,mi.ssion, after due inspecti.on, investigation and study made by
itsslf ~nd in its behalf, and after due consideretion of all ovidence an3 reports
ofPered at said heering, does find end determine the follo~ring facts:
l. That the petitioner requests the following waivers from the Anaheim Municipal
Code, to aonstruct a garege:
a. SECTION 18.25.063.011 - Minimum garage setback. (25 feet required; .
10 to 16 foet proposed)
b. SECTION 18.25.063.0113 - Minimum number of F~arking spaoes in a garageo
(3 spaces required; 2 spaaes proposed)
c. SECTION 18.25.063.020 - Minimum sideyard setbaok. (8 feei; required; '
3 feet proposed)
2. That Waiver 1-a, above-mentioned, is hereby granted, subject to the stipulation
b;,r the petitioner that the proposed garBge will be equipped with an operable automatic
vehaclo aacess door opener.
3r Thet Waiver 1-b, above-mentioned, is hereby grsnted on the besis thet the
proposed garage azll replaoe en existing two-car garage.
4. That Wai.ver 1-c, above-mentionod, is harebg grantod on the basis that the
subjoct property is irregularly shaped.
5. That there are exceptionel or extraordinery circumstences or oonditions epplic•-
able to the property involved or to the intsnded use of the property that do not apply
generally to the property or olass of use in the same vioinity and zone.
6. Thet the requested varianoe is nooessary for the preservati.on and anjoyment of
a substantial property right possessed by other property in the same vicinity end zone,
and deniod to the property in question.
7. That the requested varisnce will not be materielly detrimental to the publio
welfa~e or injurious to the property or =mprovoments in suah vicinity and zone in whiah
the property is loca,ted.
8. That no one indicated their presence at said public hearing in opposition, and
no correspondence was received in opposition to subject petition. ~
ENVIRONMGI~AL I.MPACT R~POhT FINDING:
That the Direotor of ~the Development Services Department has determined that the
proposed sativity falls within the definition of Section '~.01, Clsss.3, of the City of
Anaheim Guidelines to the Requirements for an Environmentel ]'mpaat Report and is, there-
fore, categoricelly exempt from the requirement to file an EIR.
_7._ RESOLUTION N0. PC75-139
-J
~
NCW9 TFIEREFORE, BE IT RESOLUED thc~t the Anaheim City Planning Commicsion does
hereby grant subject Petition for Varience, upon the following conditions which are
hereby found to be a neoessary prerequisite to the proposed use of the subject property
in order to preserve the safety and general welfare of the Citizons of the City of
Anaheim:
1. That subjeat proporty shall ba developed substantially in accordance with
plans and specificetions on file with the City of Anaheim mer~ed Exhi''it Nos. 1 and 2.
2. That the proposed "front-on" gBrege shell be equipped ~vith en oporable
automatic vehicle socess door opener, es stipulated to by the petitionor.
3. That Condition Nos.l end 2, above-mentioned, shall be nomplied with prior to
final building and zoning inspeotions.
1975.
TF~ FORF~'s(IING RESOLUTION is signed end epproved by me this 23rd day of June,
~
CHA PRO TEtvg'OA~
ANAf~IM CTTY PLAPIN7NG COMMISSIOAT
ATPEST:
~ " ,~,~r~;~.~~
SECRETARY~ ANAAE]Iv~ C~i'Y PLl1NN1NG COMMISSION
STATE OF CALIPORDTI'11 )
COUN'FY OF ORANGE ) ss.
UITY OF ANAf~1M )
I, Patricia B. Snenlan, Seoretery o£ the City Planning Comm.ission of the City of
Anaheim, do hereb~ aertiPy that the foregoing resolution was passed e,nd adopted et a
meeting of the City Planning Cormaission oY the City of Anaheim held on June 23, 1975,
at 1:30 p,m., by the following vote of the membors thereof:
AYES: CON9QISSIONEAS: GAiJ~Ry JOEiNSON~ KIIVG, MORLEY~ TOLAR~ PARANO
NOES: COD~dISSTONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COI~GISSIONERS: HERBST
IIv WITN~SS V~REOF, I have hereunto cet and this 23rd day of June, 1975.
s y~~ , • ~ ~~~/
SECRETARY~ ANl1I~IIu1 CII'~' PLANN]NG CO~v1ISSI0N
_Z_ RESOLUTION NOe PC75-].39