PC 75-149~ ~
RESOLUTION N0. PC75^149
A RF.SOLUTION OF THG CITY PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF A.^~AH~I?i
TIIAT PETITIOV FOR CONDITIONAL USE P~R`tIT N0, 1549 BF. GRA;dTED.
IJIIIREAS, the City Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim did receive a
verified Petition for Conditional Use Permit from ATLANTIC RICHFIELD COMPANY,
3580 Wilshire Blvd., Los Angeles, Ca. 90010 (Owner); PUP N' TACO DRIVE-UP, Attn:
Russcll C. lJendell, 4220 Long Beach Blvd., ~~280, Long Iieach, Cs. 908(17 (Agent)
of certain real property described as:
The south 175 feet of the west 175 feet of the southwest quarter of the southwest ~
quarter of the southwest quarter of the southwest quarter of section 14, Townshi.p 4
South, Ran~e 11 ldest, in the Rancho Los Coyotes, city of 9naheim, county of Orange,
state of California, as per map recorded in book 51, paEe 7 et seq., of ?discella-
neous 1•taps, in the office of the county recor~er of said county; and
WIIBREAS, the City Planning Comaission did schedule a public hearing at the City
Hall in the City of Anaheim on July 7, 1975, at 1:30 p.m., notice of said public
hearing havin~; been duly given as reauired by law and in accordance with the provision~
of the Anaheim ?tunicipal Code, Chapter 18.03, to tiear and consider evidence for and
against said proposed candi::ional use and to investi~ate and make findin^s and
recommendations in connection therewith; and
FlIi~REf+S, said Commission, after due inspection, investigation and study made by
itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all evfactse and reports
offered st saicl hearing, does find and determine the following
1. That the proposed use is properly one for which a conditional use pemit is
authorized b;~ Code Section 18.kG.050.300, to wit: permit a drive-up restaurant with
waiver of:
S~CTIOt7 lII.Q6.Oh0.~233 - ttinimum number of parkinf; spaces.-(32 required;
27 proposed)
2. Tliat the above-mentioned waiver is hereby granted on the basis that the request
is minimal for the use, as prcoosed.
3. That the petitioner scipulated Co eliminating the most southerly driveway on
the east side of Knott Street and the most westerly driveway on the north side of Ball
Road, with the proviaion that the northerly driveway on Knott Street shall be wider.ed
to a maximum of thirty (30) feet, provided, however, that the location of said northerly
driveway shall be eub3ect to the approval of the City Traffic Engineer, and that the
proposedaonVSiteslandscapingechalldbeiextendedaacrosabsaidtreplnced8drivewaygnd the
4. That the proposed use will not adversely affect the ad~oining land uaes and the
growth and development of the area in which it is proposed to be located.
5. Ttiat the size and shape of the site propoaed for the use is adequate to allo~a
the full development of the proposed usandt1generalewelfareeofithetCitizenseofathecCity
area not to the peace, health, safety,
of Anaheim.
6. That the granting of the Conditional Use Permit under the conditione imposed, if
any, will not be detrimental to Che peace~ health, safety, and general welfare of the
Citizens of the Citizens ~f the City of Anaheim.
7. That no one indicated their presence at said public hearing in opposition; and
no correspondence was received in opposition to sub~ect petition.
ENVIRON~tGNTAL IMPACT RLPORT PI'IDI:IG:
tat the
That the Director of the Development Services Department has dete::..
proposed activity falls within the definition of Section 3.01, Clasa 3, ok the City of
Anaheim Guidelines to tl~e Require~ents for an Environmental Impact Report and is, the:e-
fore, categorically exempt fron the requirement to file an EIR.
RESOLUTION N0. PC75-149
~ ~
"iOtJ, TIUiRLFORIi, II~ IT RESOLVED that the~Anaheim City Plannin~; Commission does
herel !~raat subject Petition for Conditional Use Permit, upon the followi.ng conditions
whicYi are hereby found to be a necessary prerequisite to the proposed use of the subject
property in oruer to preservc the safety and general welfare of the Citizens of the City
of Anaheim:
1. That the owner(s) of subject property shall deed to tl~e City of hnaheim a
strip of land 53 feet in width froc~ the centerline of the street alon~ Bail Road,
includin~ a 25-foot property line radius.
2. Ttiat the owner(s) of subject property chall pay to the City of Anaheim tlie suri
of 60 cents pcr front foot along Knott Street and I3a11 Road for tree planting purpose,.
3. That street li~hCing facilities along I:nott Street nnd IIall P,oad shall be
installad as required by the Director of Public Utilities, and in accordance witli standard
plans and specifications on file in the Office of the Airector of Public Utilities; and
that a bond in an amount and fonn satisfactory to the City of Anaheim shall be posted with
tlie City to ~iiarantee the installation of the above-mentioned requirements. .
4. That trash storage areas shall be provided in accordance with approved plans on
file with the Office of the Director of Public Worlcs.
5. That fire hydrants shall be installed and chaYged as required and determined to
be necessary by the Chief of the Fire Department prior to com.~nencement of structural
franin~.
6. Tliat subject property shall be served by undergroun~l utilit•les.
j; That q~~illua~;e of subject property shall be disposed of in a manner satisfactnry
tg itl:e City~ ~crj~~~~eF~
~:. ThciC the ~-."ider;ground gasoline tanks shall be removed prior to any new construction.
h, '~hat tii~;,~ G°~Se~t prc~perty shall be developed substantially in accordance with plans
and speccifica£icmF ou ~'i1e Wxth the City of Anaheim marked Exhibit Nos. 1, 2 and 3; provided,
h~flVleV~t., LItaL' r'(~e westerly driveiaay on Ball Road und the southerly driveway on Knott Street
sharl hne removal, ~s sti.pulated to by the petitioner; said driveways to be replaced with
staFd¢,Yd~ curb. ~t~.Cter and sidewalk, and the propased on-site landscaping shall be exCendad
,uro~s~ saiw~'tc:pl:sced driveways; that the northerly driv~,way on ICnott Street ehall be widened
~g g max.~t~m of thirty (30? feet; and that the locntion of the norther].y driveway on I:nott
stru.~.t shull be subject to approval of the City Traffic Engineer.
]0. Thut,Condition t:os. 1. 2, und 3, above-mentioned, sha17. be complied wfth prior to
the coi~~encement of the activity authorized under this resoluti.on: or prior to the time
that the buildin~ permit is issued, or within a p~~riod of one year from date hereof,
whichever occurs first, or such further titne ae thc Planning Commission and/or City Counci7.
may ~rant.
11. That Condition Nos. 4, 6. 7 and 9~ above-mentioned, ahall be complied with prior
to final building and zoning iilspections.
Tti~ FOREGOING P,ESOLUTION was signed and approved by me this 7th day of July, 1975.
;f ~• ~~~ ~ .~C_, /-/ /~'~~ ~
CHA It~tA,*I PFO TG'~II'ORE
ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COF4fISSIQN
ATT~ST:
~ • ,~ _ /l~,_~1.-r,~ ,
SECRLTARY, ANAIIEIM CITY PLANi7It7G CO"RtISSION
STATIs OF CALIFORPIIA )
COUNTS( OF ORANGE )se.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
_2_ RESOLUTION N0. PC75-149
~
~
~
~
I, Patricia B. Scanlan, Secretary of the City P'•_annin~ Commission of the City
of Anaheir.t, do hereby certify that the fore~oin~ resolution was P~ssed and aclopted
at a meeting of the City Planning Commission of t:}ie City of Anlheir~ he].d on July 7,
1975, at 1:3Q p.m., by the followin~ vote of the members tliereof:
AYP.S: CODL~tISSIONEP.S: ISAR:iES, 1'.TRBST, JOILNSOi7, Y.IyG, TOi.AR, P10RT.iiY
:;OIiS: CO~IItISSIO:~ERS: :IOP:S
AP,Srt7T: CO?DtISSIONRRS: FARANO
I:1 IdIT?dTiSS S+niF.RTiOF, I have hereunto set my h+~nd this 7th day of July. 1Q7S.
. . /' +J~~AA~/J~ //C/ ~~~V
~L~
S~Cit~TARY, A.VA]IAI~t CITY PLAPI'JIIiC CO?'["(ISSIQ~
_Z_ RP.SOLUTION N0. PC75-14?