PC 75-150~ ~
RESOLUTIOV N0. PC75-15~
A RESOLUTION OF Tlili CITY PLtidNIN~ COPflISSION OF Tllr CITT OF ADIAI1EI19
TkIAT PE.ITI0:1 FOR CONDITIO:~AL USE PER`SIT N0. 155~ BP. GRANTED.
WHEIZEAS, the City Planning Commiasion of the City of Anaheim did receive a
verified Petition for Conditional Use Permit from ROBIiRT MILLiiR, 153!1 S. liarhor
IIoulevard, Anaheim, Ca. 92801 (Owner); LUCILL~ VOGT~ 1755 W. La Palma Avenue,
Anaheim, Ca. 92801 (Agent) of r,extain re11 property situated in the City of Anaheim,
County of Orange, State of California, describerl as:
Lot i~os. 13, 14, •'§ of 15 of Tract ~o. 483 as recorded in book 17, page 20,
*tiscellaneous ?taps~ records of said Orange County; and
Ln~uR~AS, the City Planning Commission did hold a public hearinp at the City Hall
in the City of Anaheim on July 7. 1975, at 1:3~ p.m., notice of said public hearing
having been duly given ac required by law and in accordance witli the provisions of
the Anaheim Municipal Code. Chnpter lII.Q3, to hear and conai.der evidence for and
a~ainst said proposed conditional uae and to investigate and make findinp,s and
recommendations In connection theretiith; and
l~[I~RGAS~ said Cr.:~tA.ssion, after due inspectian; investigatio[i and study made by
itself and in its brhalf. and after due conaideration of all evidence and reports
offered at eafd hearing, does find and determine the following facts:
i. That the proposed use is properly one for which a conditi~nal uae permit is
authorized by Code Section 18.~+4.050.O1C, to wit: permit on-sale beer and wine ir~ an
existing restaurant.
2. That the proposed use will not adversely affect the ad~oining land uses and
the growtl~ and development of the area in which it ie proposed to be locatecl.
3. That the aize and tshape of the aite proposed for the use is adeqiiate ta
allow the full development of the propoaed use in a manner not detrimental to the
particulnr area nor to the peace, health~ safety, and general welfare of the Citizena
of the City of Anaheim.
~i.. That the grunting of tt~e Conditionsl Use Permit under the conditions
imposed, if any, will not be detrimental to the peace, health. safety and general
welfare of the Citizene of ehe City of Anaheim. •
5. That the peti.tioner atipulated to thc immediate removal of an exietinF
ille~al roof sign o:- the aubject property.
6. That approval of this conditional use permit ahall be aubject to compliance
with the requirements of the Orange County Health Department.
7. That the Plunning Commission does hereby determine that since the applicant
is not the property owner, requiremeats in connection with ded3cation for streeC
widening and payment of tree planting fees shall not he required at this time.
8. That no one indicated their presence ak snid public hearinE in opposition;
and no correopondence vas received in opposition to sub~ect petition.
SNVIRONIdENTAL IMPACT REPORT FINDENC:
That the Director of the Develupment ~ervices Department has determined thnt the
proposed activity falls within the definition of Sectlon 3.01, Clase 1. of the City
of Anahcim Guidelines to the Requirements for an Environmental Impact Report and is,
therefore, cate~orically exempt from the reqiiirement to file an fiIR.
RESOLUTI0:1 N0. PC75-15~
. ~ ~
c:Uld, ililiFrFORE, BE IT RliSOLVGD that the Anaheim CiCy Plannin~ Commission does
hereby grant subject Petition for Conditional Use Yermit, upon the followin~osed use
condition~ whi.ch are here~y found Co be a necessary prerequis3te. to the prop
of the subject property in order to preserve the safety and general welfare of the
Citizens of the City of Anaheim:
1. That an ex;.stin~ ilJ.egal roof sign or the sub~ect property shall be removed
immediately, as stipulated to by the petitioner.
2. Plans shall be suLmitted to the Building Division sh~wing compliance with
the minimum standards of the City of Anaheim, including the Uniform Building,
Plumbing, ~lectzical, 1{ousing, Mechanical and Fire Codes as adopted by the City of
Anahein. The a,^.propriate permits shall be obtained for any necessary work; anci the
use sh«11 comply with the requirements of the Oran~e C~unty Health Department. •
3. That subject property shall be developed substantially in accordance with
plans and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim marked Exhibit Nos. 1 and 2.
4. That Condition No. 2, ahove-mentioned, shall ~e complied with within a period
of sixty (60) days from date tiercof.
TIiP FOREGOItdG RESOLUTION is si~ned and approved by me this 7Ch day of July,
1975.
;~~,G c,i(: .~7 /%'~,--~.G(-
T~ ~ ~
~} IR.v,py~, PRO TEMPORE
A?dAHEIM C7.TY PLANftIP1G COMMISSION
A'LTEST :
~~i e~~ ~~f~/
SRCRfiTARY, ANAH.EIM CITY PLANNIN6 ~OMMISSION
STATT•. OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE )5g• ~ .
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, Patricia B. Scanlan, Secretary of the City Planning Commission of the City of
Anaheim, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopCed at a
meeting oi the Ci~he following ~tesofnthe nember3yther ofheim, held on July 7, 1975,
at 1:30 p.m., by
AYL'S: COMNtISSI0NER3: BARNES, H~R13ST, JOFIDISON, KIPIG} TOLAR, MORLEY
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSrNT: COMItISSIONERS: PARAIVO
IN WITNESS i~kiEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 7th day of Julq, 1975.
,('"/ i .~~C G~-~ 1~ l~L~C ~.s~u
SECRETARY, ANAHRIM CITY PLANNING COMh1ISSI01~
-2-
R~SOLUTION N0. PC75-15Q