PC 75-20. _ .. ~ _ , ~
RESGLUTION N0. P~75-20
A RESOLU1lON OF THE rITY PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
THAT PETITION FOR VARIANCE N0. 2663 BE DENIED
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission of the City of Maheim did receive a verified Petition for Variance from MAR I ON
CARTER, 337 Calle Felicidad, San Clemente, California 92672 (Owner); AL WIENER, 866 South
Harbor Boulevard, Anaheim, California 92805 (Agent) of certain real property situated in the
City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California, described as Lot No. 36 of Tract No.
1392 as per map recorded in the office ~f the County Recorder of said County; and
WI-IEREAS, the City Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at thc City Hall in the City of Anaheim on
J anua ry 20 , 1975 , at 1: 30o'clock p.m., notice of said public hearing having been duly ~iven as rcquired by law and
in acwrdance with the provisions of the Maheim Municipal Code, Chapter 18.03,to hear and consider evidence for and against said
p~oposed variance and to investigate and make findings and recommendations i~i cannecti~n therewith; and
WHEREAS, said Commission, after due inspection, investigation, and study madc by itself and in its behalf, and after due
consideration of all evidencc and reports offercd at said hearing, does find and detcrmine the Collowing facts:
]. Thatthepetitionerrequests the fol lowing variances from the Anaheim Municipal Code, to
establish a modeling agency in the CO (Commercial, Office and Professionol) Zone:
a. SECTION 18.05.09Z - Permitted si nin .(Free-standing signs not permitted in
the CO Zone
b. SECTION 18.41.020 - Permitted uses. (Modeling agency not permitted in t.he CO
- Zone)
2. That the above-menlioned waivers are hereby denied on the basis that the
petitioner ir,dicated the existing use was for a modeling agency and studio, and said use is
not permitted in the CO Zone.
3, That there are no exceptional or extraordinary c.i~cumstances or conditions appli-
cable to the property involved or to the intended use of the property that d~ not apply
generally to the property or class of use in the same vicinity and zone,
4. That the requested variancc is not necessary for the preservation and enjoyment
of a substantial property right possessed by other property in the same vicinity and zone,
and denied to the property in question.
5, That the requested variance will be materially detrimental to the public welfare
or injur'sous to the property or improvements in such vicinity and zone in which the property
is lucated.
6. That no one indicated their presence at said public hearing in opposition, and no
correspondence was received in o¢position to subject petition.
ENVIRONMrNTAL IMP~,CT REPORT FINDING:
That th~ Director of Development Services has determined that the proposed activity falls
within the dpfinition of Section 3.01, Class 1 of the City of Anaheim Guidelines to the
Requirements for an Environmental Impact Report and'is, therefore, categorically exempt from
the requirement to file an EIR.
V1-D -1- RESOLUTION N0. PL75-ZD
DEV-66•E
_ ". " ----- -~--• ----- • ~ .__.
__. __ ,
a,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Maheim City Planning Commission does hcrcby deny subject Pctition far
Variance on lhe basis of the aforementioned finds.
THE FOREGO!NG FESOLUI'ION is signed and approved by me this 20th day of Janua ry , 1975.
. `'~ ~G~ ~-' .~
~
' CEi RMAN ANAHEIAfCITY PLANNING COMMISSIU~1
AT"TEST:
' ~~
(-Cr~ti~ ~ ~ {,~'~~~~
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLArN[NG COMMISSION
SfATEOFCALIFORNfA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, Pat r i c i a B. Sean 1 an , Secretary of the Ciry Planning Commission oC the Ciry of Anaheim, do hereby certify that tl~e
foregoing resol~ition was passed and adoptcd at a meeling of the City Planning Commiuion of the City of Mahcim, hcld on
Janua ry 20 , i 975 , at 1:30 o'clock p.m by the following vote of the members thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: FARANO, GAUER, KING, MORLEY, TOLAR, HERBST
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMhi1S510NERS: JOHNSOIS
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I havc hereunto set my hand this 20th day of January, 1975. I
~j~i~.u~ /~~ ~'G'.ac~=/.7~.<.~
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING CDMMiSSIQN
-Z-
V2-D RES•OLUTION N0. PC75-2~