PC 75-206~ RE~LZTTIOtv VO. PC75-206 ~ .
A RF.SOLUPION OF T[IE CITSC PL~NNa7G ~a`'~''ZSSI(7~1 UT' ,T.E~ CIZ°Y OF PSU11~I~i``
F2~3TJISVG TO Tt~ CITY COLT:ICII, OF Tlff; CT''PY' OF A.°IAHEIt~i Tf~:T PEPITION
FbR Rf~1'~SSIFIC7ITI~*] N0. 75-76-7 ~ APPPJVED.
WI~1S, the City Planning CaRnissian af the City of Anah~m d~.d initiate a
verifiecl Petiticn for Reclassification on ce--''tain real pmp°.st.y si.tuatecl in the City
of Anaheim, County of Ora~e, State of Californi.a, describod asa
That parcei of land located in the Caunty of Orange, State of Cali£orni.~,
describod as follows:
geg;nning at a point in the existi.n3 City limit line of the City of Anaheim as
established by the rb1~]-er Drxve No. 2 Anner.ation to said Cit~l, said point of
~qinninq being in the northerly tesminus of Yhe li.~e described in said
annexation as N 6° 30' 33" E, 361.67 feet; tlience fol.la.ring alon, a Tx,r~ion af
said Nbhler Drive P]o. 2 1~rulexation boundarv~ the £ollowing oours~s arxi distances:
S 6° 30' 33" S9, 361.67 feet; ti~nce N 82° 09' 14" W, h49.10 feet; thenCe lwavit?~
~d ~t~YatipTt boundary N 6° 55' 10" ~~ 209.35 feet; thPS~Ce S 77° /!5' 3Fif' .' e
22A.30 feet; thenCe N 58° 28' 00" E, 133.32 feet; thenCe N 4° 09' 00" E, 20.G~-
feet; thence N 69° 10' 30" ~, 135.2~! fEr_t to the point ~f becJinni~xl.
y~E~i~L'AS, the City Planning ~atmi.ssion did hold a public heating at the City
liall in the City of Anaheim on October 13, 1975, at 1:30 p.m., nntice of said I~1~=
hearing having been duly given as required kry law and in accor~nCe w5.th th°
provisions of the Anaheim Municipal Code, Chapter 18.03, to hear ard. b:insideY~
evidence for ar~d against said proposed reolassification and to investigat:e ~rto3 ma3ca'~
findings arxi re~tions in wnnection therewith; and
W~~,, sair3 Cartnission, after due in.~^~x~ction, investigation and s~.'"ud1 made
by' itself ami ~n its ~aoes~ a a aet~~ the followin~71factsence and re1 ~rts
offered at said hearing,
1. That the Anaheim City Planning Carmission proposes a reclassifi:~a~ion
of the above-descri.be.d ProPertY fran th~ 0~~~ ~' ~~~ 100-E4-7.0, Op0 (SN'v;L,L
I:ST11T!'.S) DISTRICT to the CITY OF ANAI~IM RS-A-43r 000 (SC) (RFSIDE~PIN./P+GRICOI,TURAL -
SC~'~IIC OORRII]OR WEKLAY) ZO?~.
2. That the llnaheim General Plan designates subject propestY for law-
density residential uses; anr3, therefore~ the Propose~ reclassification is in
con£ozmance with t1~e Anahe~m ~eneral Plan.
3. That the proposed reclassification would establish the Ci.ty of Anaheim
holding zone on the subject ~ropertY P~9 f~lization cf a develo~nent zone at a
later date.
4. That the subject PrapertY is currently p~~3.°~Pletion of annexation
to the City of 1lnaheim undes 'the "A'bhler IXive No. 4 Annexation.
5, That the proposeci reclassification of subject prr~pertY is necessary
an3/or desisable fcr the order].y ar~d proC~ex' develognPnt of the ccmm~nitY.
6. ~ti the proposecl reclassification of subject property does pmperlY
relate to the zones and t.heir Permitted uses locally established in close proximitY
~~~~ prop~,Y and to t,he zones and theis p~.zmi.tted uses genesally established
throughout the ~,rommuv.tY•
7, That no one indicated their presence at said public hearin4 ir-
opposition; ard no coY'z'esPor~d~ce was received in ch>position to subject Petitfon.
IINlI2CR~*~fAL IMPAGT REPORT FIfIDING:
That t1~e Planning Camiission does hereby r~ to the City Cuuncil that
the subject project be exam~t frcm the requirener-t to prepare an enviro~tal impact
r~rt~ pursuant to the provisions of the California fhvirorrmental Quality Act.
~~ ~ftE~ gG IT I~SOLUID that the Anaheim City Planninq CaRnissa.on
dces hereby rec~ t~ th~ CitY Crnu~cil of the City of Anaheim that ~ub7ect
pe~y~~ gor Reclassification be a~roved 'arr1, b1' so doin4~ *~t~at Title 18-7.onin4 of
RESCILUPZdN N0. Yf:75-206
the Anahei~n f~nicipal ~ be a~~end~i to exc.lude the ~escribed prop~xty from
the COUTli'Y 9F ORANQ', i 0-E4-20,000 (St~~ F~_'~`i'S) DSS CI and to inocrpa:lte sai;:
descxibecl ~ttopez'tY 171bD tY1C~ CITY 0:' IS~IAHEII4 RS-1~ 43 ~ 000 (SC) (Rc~^SZDI.14PI11I,/ACRICI7f TtJR11L
- SC~lIC COR*2ID~R CN'c~tIAY} ZONE upon tne follcxaing conditions which are~ oYder Yz>
to be a necessasy l~rer~uisite to the proposed use of subject PronertY
~~~;e ~P safQty and q~eral welfare of the Citizens of the City of ~na~im:
(1) That these reclassificati.on proceedings are granted subject to
canpletion of anne~tation of subject property bo the City of Anaheim.
Tf~ ~F2T',GOIl9G RESOLUTIOtd is signeci and approved 1-h' me this 13th day of
October, 1975.
i' 'S X ~
CYJ,IF~'P~N r ~HEIM CITY ~IAN!QING CCNA'LiSS303~
P.TTF•S'P:
~~~~~,~~~~~
S~11Fbi~ ANAFL`~IM CITY PII~NNING CONF'IISSIflN
STATE OF CALIF03IIJIA )
COUN:Y OF ORANGE )ss.
CITY OF ANAHEItd )
I, Patricia B. Scanlan, Secretary of the City Plannim3 Canni.ssion of the
City of Anaheim, do herebY certifY tlat the foregoing resolution was passed anl
adopted at a meeting of the City Planning Ca~mission o£ the City of Anaheim, held on
October 13 1975, at 1:30 p.m., by the follvaing wte of the menbc~~'s thereof:
AYES: ~ COP4~'IISSIONERS: BAfi4ES, F~ST, JOF~IS~JN~ I(ING, NqRIEY, TOII~R, FARANO
NOFS: OOI~R~'ffS5I0NE.TtS: NGNE
PBSF.f7f: CONQ4ISSIOPIERS: N(7t~
1975.
It:; Wi'ii~'SS ~~RDOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 13th day of October,
~~ ~~J
s~rn~rr, Arm,~-~~ crrsr ~~,*.*uiluar, occ~rassioN
-2- ~OLLTPION N0. ~75^20E: ~