PC 75-215.. ~w ~ ~
RE;SOLT7PIOtI i~, PC75-215
A RLSOLUTIOid OF' Tf~ CI'.CY PLI~NNI~IG O~MMISBI():Q OF Tf~ CITSC 0° AT•I7UI~It~T
RLY:O P~ffidDING ~ T}lE CITY O~UNCIL OF TIiF. CITY OF AI~f~I*4 T[11i Pf.TI?'I~N
FOR RFX.T.TISSIFICATIO:~I N0. 75-76-10 ffi' APPi~DVF.~.
~~h~1~S, the Citv Planning Ccmnission of the City of Anaheim did receive a
verific~i Petition for Reclassification frcm ImL11TdD T. REY~IOLt~S, 5Q5 South Sunkist
Stseet, Anaheim, California 92806 (Owner); AT4ICAL II~IGa~f:TtTJG CO., 222 E. Lincoln
Avenue, Anaheim, California 92803 (F.ngineer) of certain real pm~erty situa~ed in the
City of Anahei,-n, County of Orange, State of California, described as:
All that certairs land situated in the State of California, County of Orange, City of
1+naheim, descri}~eci as follows:
The Northeast quarter of the Southeast quarter of the ~utlnaest r~uarter of Section 12 ~
Township 4 South, Range 10 West, S. B. B. & M.
WE~REAS, the City Planning Ca~tnission did lwld a public hearing at the City
Hall in the City of Anaheim on OctobPx 29, 1975, at 1:30 p.m., notice of said public
heari:ig having been duly given as requireci by law and i.n accordance ~•rith the
pmvisions of the Anaheim Muni~ipal Caie, Chapter 18.03, to hear ancl consider
evidence for and against said proposed reclassification and to investigate and make
fi.ndings and reornmendatior.s in connection therewitlz; and
Wf~REAS, said Camussion, after due inspection, investigation arr3 study made
kn1 itself am3 in its behalf, and after due consideration o£ all cvidence and reports
offered at said hearing, does fincl ancl determ.ine the follovring facts:
J 1. That the petitioner proposes a reclassification of the above-described
property fran the RS-A-43,000 (RESInIIdT2AL/AGRICULT[JR~1I,) ZONE to the RS-7200
~~szv~aruw, SL~IGL~-F71P~Y) ZO~.
2. That the P.nahe~m GPneYal Plan designates subject property for low-
de~sity residenti.al use.
3. That the pronosed r.ecZassification of subject property is necessary
ancl/or desirable for the orderly and proper develoFanent of the cara+.nmity.
4. That the pr~pos?~ reclassification of subject property does properly
relate to the ~ones and theis pPSmitted uses locally es,.ablished in close proximity
to s+abject pro~~sty and t~o the zones arul their pernutted uses geriesally established
throughout the catmunity.
5. That the proposed re:::7.assification of subject pmperty rc'quires the
dedication and inprrn enent of abutting streets in accorckznce vrith the Cisculation
Ela~nt of the General Plan, due to the anticipatecl increase in traffic which will be
generated by the intensificaticn of land use,
6. That no one irxlicated theis presence at said public hearing in
opposition; and no correspondence was received in opposition to subject petition.
IIJVI:20T3t~]'.CAL IMPACT REPORT FINDING:
That the Planninr Carmi.ssion does herelyy recrnmend to the City Council that
the subject project k~ Pxa~t fran ths r~+~irenent to prepare an enviroranental impact
repor.t, pursuant to the ?ravisions of the California Environmental Quality Act.
~ NC149, Tf~1ZE~'ORE, ~ IT RFSOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning Cc~ni.ssion
does hereby recan~d to the City Cfluncil of t1~e Citl of P~naheim that subject
Petition for Reclassification be approved and, by so doing, that Title 18-7,oning of
the Anaheim Municipal Cale he amended to Fxclude the above-describ~l prop~sty fran
the RS A-43, 000 (RESIDI3~TIAL/AGItZCULTtJItAL) ZOI~ and to incorporate said described
pmperty into the RS-7200 (RFSIDFNPIAL, SINGLE-FN~LY) 7•0[a; upon the follaw.ing
conrlitions which are heXeby found to be a necessary prerequis:i.te to the proposed use
of subject propex'ty in order to preserve the safety and general welfare of the
Citizens of the City of Anaheim:
1. That fire hydrants shall be installed and charqed as require3 and
deterniined to be necessaxy by the Chief of the Fire Departr~ent prior to amnencenent
of structural framing.
FtESOLiTrION N0. PC75-215
` 2, That a~inal tract map of subject pr ~ shall be sulmitted to aryd
approved by the City Council arid then be recorded in the Office of the Oranqe County
Re~order.
3. That arnpletion of these reclassification proceedings is contingent
upon the granting of Variance No. 2'743.
TF.~ FOAEGOaiG 1~SOLUPION is signed and approved by me this 29th day of
October, 1975.
AITEST:
G2~%t-GGGA~
SDCRETARY, ANA,'~IP1 CITY PLANNIIdG CC~^'A'fISSION
STATE OF CALIF'ORiQIA )
COUT'i'Y OF OR71tdGE: ) ss.
CITY OF AY~1I~If'! )
~e /~/ L~ :Z~~
CY~IR'97~.P7,' PItO ' • RE
AI:~It•1 CITY PI~F~NNING OOt•'N9ISS20*] ~
I, Patricia II. Scanlan, Secretary of the City Planni~ Ca[mission of the
City of Anaheim, do heseby certify that the foregoing resolution was gassed arid
adopteci at a meeting of th~ City Planning ranni.ssion of the City of Anaheim, held on
October 29, 1975, at 1:30 p.m. , by the follawing wte of the manbe~ss thereof :
AYES: ' CQ'~'P9.ISSIO[~RS: BARNF•S, HERBST~ JOH[~~SON, ICIDtG~ ~IAR~ NDRIEY
NO~S: CONL~'12SSIOAtS3RS: NCR~
ABSPII~T: CONAtISSI~RSe' FARIINO
IN WITNfSS Wf~I2E0F, 2 have hereunto set my harxl this 24th day of October,
1975.
O~~~J~
SECP,F,TI~ItY~ ANAFIEL~I CITY PI~AI~IdING OONA7ISSI0*I
-2- RESOLLTPION N0. PC75-215