PC 75-225~ ~
RESOLiTrI0:1 i]O. PC75-225
~~
w~
A RPSOLUiIO:I OF TfII: CI'I'Y PLAPTi1IP]G Glk'II+IISSI(7;7 OF TIlE CITY OF 1~?~:F~i;
T[~i PETIiION F17R VARIANC~ N0. 27h5 SE G}~DTPED.
WI~3IZC11S, the City Plannim3 Ca~mi~sion of the City of Anaheim di.ci receive a
verifiecl Petftion for Variance frrn F~IA SL•S~LL, P. 0. Box 4729, Anaheim,
California 92803 (Owner); F~RI3ERT P~DEL AND ASSOC., 16250 Ventura Bwlevard, ¥316,
Enc.ino, California 913h~ (Agent) of certain real pznperty situated in the City of
P.natiein, County ef Orar~e, State of California, descr.ihed as:
i:~~_ land referrecl to in this policy is situatecl in the State of Cali£ornia, County of
Orange, City of Analieun, anc2 is descrik~eci as follows:
P~1I3~I, 1:
That portion oi the idortl+ _lf o£ the Northwest quarter of tlie Soutlnaest quarter of
the Ilortiraest qiiarter of Seccion 9, Taunshin 4 Sauth, Range 10 West, in the Rancho
San Juan Cajon de Santa Ana, as ~er map recorcied in book 51, page 10 of Miscellaneous
Maps, in the office of the County Reoordex of saici County descrit~eci as follows:
Beginnim~ at a point on ttie West line of saicl land ciistant 332.61 feet Souttier.ly fran
the tdortlraest corner ttiereof; thence South 89° 45' 09" East 659.55 feet; thence t~orth
0° 14' S7" ~~est on the ~ast line of said lanci 332.21 feet; thence South 39° ~7' 15"
West alonCJ tlie I~]orth line of said lanci G59.64 feet ta said t4orthwest cornes; thence
South 0° 15' S2" East along said West li.ne 332.61 feet to the point of 1~eginnimJ.
I~ccepting therefran the following descril~c3 13n3:
L3eginning at a point on tl~e i~est line of said land distant 154.54 feet Soutlierly fran
the tlortlnac:st wrner thereof; thence South 89° 22' 57" ~ast 290.03 feet; tlience tlorth
0° 10' 27" West 5II.99 feet; thence Plorth A9° 43' 29" F.ast 1Q1.15 feet, thence t~ortlt
0° 15' 52" West parallel with said West line 139.64 feet to the Prartll line of said
:lortli onrhalf; thence South 89° 47' 15" West along said tdortli line 391.39 feet to
said NorYliw~est corner; tience South 0° 15' 52" East along said West line 194.5G feet
to the poiitt of begiruiing.
PAI2CET 2:
In.t 69, Tract 2517, as shown on a map recorcieci in book 133, pages 40, 41, and 42,
tdi.scellaneous Ma~s, Recorcis af County of Orange.
L•7ccepting Eran Ir~t 69 that portion as fol.laws:
Beginning at a point on the i~est line of said lan3 distant 1£36.09 feet Southerly fmn
the :Iorthwest ~rncr theroof; tlience South 89° 43' 41" East 277 feet; tiience North 0°
15' 40" West on the Fast line of said larxl C+Q feet; thence S~uth fl9° 43' a" t4est
along a line parallel with the Llortli line of said land 27' feet thence South 0° 15'
90" Fast along said West line 60 feet to the poi.nt of beginning.
WF~ItE71S, tl-,e City Planning Cam~ission dici scheclule a public hearing at the
City Hall in the City of Anal~eim on October 29, 1975, at 1:30 p.m., rr~tice of sai~3
puUlic heariny having been duly given as re~uired l7y la~a and in accordance with the
provisions of the Anaheim Municipal Ca3e, Chapter 18.03, to hear azx'i consider
evidence for. and against saici proposed variance and to investigate arxi make findings
arrl rec,~rnmendations in wnnection therewith; said public hearing having been continued
to the Planning Cattnission meeting of ttwanber 10, 1975; and
Wf~Ri'1~5, said Cmenission, after due insZ~~ction, investigation anci study made
by itselE ancl in its b~lialf, and after due consideration of all evidence anci reports
offereci at said hearing, does firui and detennine the following facts:
1. That the petitioner requests the follaa.uig waiver fran the Anaheim
Nhanicipal Cale, to construct a ban}c:
SECiION 18.06.060.0222 - Min'Tum niunbes of arkinq ces. (106 soaces
requir ~ 93 spaces proPosed -
2. That the ahove~nc~.ntione3 uraives is hereby granted on the basis that th~e
petitioner proposes to establish 93 standard par}cing s7aaees ancl 13 sil~staruiard or
oczrtpact aar parkim3 spaces; saici 13 oanpact car pai-king spaces being typically 7 1/2
~l.PION i~0. PC75-225
~ ~
X 15 feet in size; saici waiver beiny granteci sut~jeet to the stipulation of the
petitioner tl~t each of ttie 13 canpact car parYina spaces will be clearly markecl.
3. That the lraffic Ilxjineering Division reccm:~ds t1~at vehicular access
to thf: clrive-throuyh ]k.-3nlc wirxlows siwuld ~e fran the west with cars ertiting directlY
to L•~cli~~ Street to eliminate the possibility of waiting velucles backing into Eticlici
Street.
4. That there are e::ceptional or extraordinary circinnstances or wnditions
applicable to t3ie propesty imrolved or to t1~e intesxiecl use of the property that do
not apply gesier.ally to the prc~erty or class of use in t]~:e s~ne vicinity ancl zone.
5. Thar the rec7uestc~i variance is necessary for the preservauon anl
enjoyr~u:nt of a sutxstantial proPerty right possesse3 Jrl athes p..mpert:~ in t-~ same
vicinity an~ zone, ancl denied to the pmperty in question.
6. That the requesi:~7 vari.ance wi.ll not be materially detsiriental to the
public welfare or injurious to the property or i~roverents in such vicinity anci zone
in wluch tlie propesty is locatecl.
7. That no one ixuiicatecl theis presence at said public hearing in
opposition; ancl no corresporxience was received in c~osition to subject petition.
IIdVIRAi~IItC?•7TAL IPtPP.GT REPOI7P FL'7DII7G:
That Uie lliseci:or of the Planniny Depari7nent l~as deterniinec~ that the
proposecl activity falls within the deEinition oE Section 3.Q1, Class 11, of the City
of Analieu~l C~idelines to tlie Requiranents for an Ehvironmental ImQact Repox't and is,
th.seEore, cateyorically n:c~t Eran the requiranent to file an EIR.
Zda4, TI~ItEFORF., BE IT 1~SOLVJ~ that the Anaheim City Planning Crnmission
does herPlyy grant subject Petition for Variance, tmon the follc~wing conclitions which
are hereby £ourMi to ~e a necessary prerequisite to the proposed use of th~ subject
property in order to preserve the safety and general ~+~lfare of the Citizens of the
City oP Anahein:
1. That sul~ject pronerty shall l~e developed subst~intially in accordance
with plans anci specif-ications on file witlt the City cf Anaheim r.~arkeci I•~clu.bit I1o. 1;
proviciecl, txraever, that the vehicular access to the drive-through ka3nk winlows shall
be fran the west with cars nciting directly to L•tiiclid Street; ancl that the
substancia.rcl or ar~act car parY.inY s~aces sl~all be clearly markec3 to irxlicate saicl
sFxzces are for ca~~act cars only and not for standard or larger sized cars.
TF~ FOR~CAII7G RCSOI~TPIO:] is signeci and approvocl by rne this 10th c]ay of
tJovc3nber. 1975. i~/ n /
X
7~ ~~~
c~~x~r~,r~, .i~z crr~r Pz~rr.lnac ar~rzssicm~
ATPF.Si :
~~~,~~~~
SEQ2F,^1~'~ A•111I~LM CITY PLIiJ[7~]G N^RdISSIC~,7
~AT~ OI' GlLIFpIi[7IA )
COUNTY OF ORAN(T )ss.
CIZ^l OF ]1NAH[:I14 )
I, Patsicia l3. Scarilan, Secretary of the City Planr?.ng C.amiission of the
City of Anaheim, do herelrf certify that the foregoi.ng resolution was passed arx3
adopteci at a meetim,~ of the City Planning Cafmission oE the City of 1,nalteim, held on
ilovanber 10, 1975, at I:30 p.m., }~ the followimJ vote of the ~~s thereof:
AYiS: (:ON&+IISSIO?~IFRS: BARI~S~ HERBST~ KIidG, MORI~SC~ TOLAR, FARAt~
tIOFS: CGIq•*lSSIOi]F.RS: I10IJ~
AB57~di: COI~TIISSIOt~P,S: JOF~ISUN
1975.
I27 WI'i".IFSS ~Vf~RD~F, I have hereunto set my harxl this 1Qth day of t7ovenner,
~!'~Z~.t~GLec-~ • GG~t~ix~
~TARY, Ai1A~If4 CITY PLANtd~7G OOD't~'IISSION
-2- I~SOLilrION N0. PC75-225