PC 75-247~ ~
I2ESOL(TPI0:~1 bR~. PC75-2A7
A?2ESOLLTPIO'I OF ^_'i~ CI~' P~IIIT171G C;f~f'2SSI0'1 OF ThE CITY OF AN11F~]Td
THAT PLTSTIOi~ f~UR G'Oi~ITIC7NAL OSE PETt`~[IT I~. 1530 SE GR71`7I'Y~.
c~fII~tL'.~~5, the City Pla,~nu~g CamLission of the City of Anatieim clid receive a
verifiec; Petition for Conditional Use Permit iran FRAPIIC SPII34ELLr 514 South Bay FYont
Drive, IIal.~oa Islan~, Californi.a 92G62; ELI7,AT3ETI3 REDDING Ai•ID f~i,:7J S4ILh'E, c% Frank
Stilwell, 5?.~l Soutt: Iiay Front Drive, Ba7J~oa Island, California 92662 (fhaners) ; Hc~~~:R
[~LSI,CF., 729 ilortll Tope}:a, I~naheim, Cali.fornia 92805 (AgP~t) oE certain real proper`y
situatecl in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California, described as:
Block C 143 ancl I,~t Nos. 5, G, 7, and II,
~~F~Iti:AS, the City Planning Caimissicn did hold a publ.ic heariny at the City
Hall in tlie City of lviaheim on Nove~nber 24, 1975, at 1:30 p.m., notice of said public
71P~1T]S1J l~vin9 been dul.y given as requireci by law and in acwrdance with the
provisions of the ~'~~aheim Municipal Cale, Chapter 18.03, to hear and consider
evi.dence for anci against said proposeci c.ronciitional usA and to irn~estigate anci make
finclin~3s uu3 rc~c.~rnmenclations in connection thercxvith; and
«IES2F's'~, said Camussion, after due inspection, investigation and stu~y macie
by itself a~xi in its :~ehalf, aml after due consider.ation of all evidence and reports
off•erc~cl at saicl hearin~7, elr:~s iinci asgi detenrtine the follaainq facts:
i. That the broposed use is nror~erly mye for which a Coriditional Use
Pennit is authori.zeci Uy Code Sections 18.03.~'1n anci 18.45.05Q.060 to permit boat
sales anrl servicing.
That Uie proposed use will not aclversely affect the adjoining larui uses
ami Uie c~rowth anci develognent oL• the arc.a in wluch it is proposed to be loeateci.
3, '!'1~iL the size anci shape of the site I:: ~~~osc~i for t11e use is adequate ta
allow ttie L-ull develogrv~nt of the proposeci use in a rhvuies not detrimental to the
p~~rticular area nor tc~ the peace, healt}i, saf•ety, ancl 9eneral welfare ~f the Citizens
of the City of 1~naheim.
4. That the c~ranting o£ the Conditianal lise Pernti.t under the oonditions
inq~osed, if any, will not be detrir.iental to the peace, healtl~, safety, arnl general
welfare of. tlie Citizens of tlie City of Anaheim.
5. That the petitioner stipulat~l to the mnditiott that all motor and
cx~gine repair ~.ork u~uld be ~sfonned inside the lrsilding.
6. That one persc~n apr~earc~l in opposition to subject Petition.
II]VI1tOtII•1C~"'AT, IfdPP.CP RI~OFrI' FIIIDING:
That the Director of the P~~nnin4 DePartrrnnti 1~s determined that the
proposed ac*_ivity falls witliin the definition of Section 3.01, Class 1, of tne City of
Anal~eim Guidelines tr_~ the RequiL+3nents for an ~nvireraner-tal Impact Report and is,
tl~erefore, categorically enar,pt fmn the rr_r~uire~~t to file an EIR.
,yaq~ TII~RF•~'ORC, F3E ZT RE~LVED tl~at t'.~e F~naheim City Planni.ng C~mnission
does heret7y grant subject Petition for Conditional Use Pesmit, upon the follaaing
conciitions which are hereby found to be a necessary prerequi.site t~ the pioposed use
of thc subject property in order to preserve t~e safety and gener'al w~elfare o£ tne
Citiz~ns of the City of Anal~eim:
1. That the owner(s) of suhject property shall deed to the C:ity of 1lnaheim
a strip of land 40 f?et in width rran t~l~e centerline of the street along l~naheim
I3c~ulevarci, a strip of 1~*ul 10 feet in width from the eentexline of the alley, and a
i5-foot pro~:ty line retusn along La V~sne Street and Anaheim 13oulevard for street
wideninq pur~ses; providecl, haaever~ that oonclitional dc~3ication may be made alorr~ a
portion of the alley it the existing >tructures encroach into said alley.
2, iliat trash s'-nrage are'.s shall tx providu3 in accordance with approvod
~~lans on file with i:he office of the Director of Public WorY.s.
3. That Cora3ition Nos. 1 ara3 2, abovc.~-mentioned, shall be cac~lic~ci with
pr.ior to fin..l bui7~3ing and zoning i.ns~x-'cf:ions.
RP•_SOLf7Piffil N0. PC75-2A7
~
~'
~ ~
4. That subject property shdll be 3evelopc~ci substantially in acoordaiice
with plans anci specifications on file with the City of Anaheim markeci L•~chibit t1os. 1
atni 2.
5. That all matnr ar~i enqine repais oork shall be perf~rn~eci inside the
buxldirig,
Tf1E ~F~GOTidG RFSOWPIn:1 is signocl a~d appmvec3 by me this 24th day of
NovHnber, 1975.
S/Ri nani tJ1o~ ey
C~iAIR41aSJ PRO TI3~TORE
AI~111HEIM CITY PLAN:7IflG ~SSxON
AZTEST:
~.aZ`.~L0.~ ~
SI~E°Y.11d Bl1LT~PSS
SIxRETAAY Pfd~ T~•'~OftC
1~Nlr F~EItd CITY PLAPRdING COI•P4iSSICT.l
STATE OF CALIFI~RI17~ : )
C(AJf7TY OF ORAIV~: ) ss.
CITSt OP' AtU~I~:If'I )
I, Aletha Burgess, Secretasy Pro Ter~pore of tlie City Plannir~g Ccmnission of
the City of Anaheim, do herelrt cestify that the foregoina resolution ~ras passed anci
acioptoci at a meeting of the City Planning ('.rnr,iission of the City of Anaheun, held on
ltovc~rr 24, 1975, at 1:30 ».m., by the following ~rote of the mc3^.bez~s thereof:
AYES: CQ-.'ISSIO?~'ERS: 1~iF35T, FCIIQG, MDRi~Sf, TOIT,R
fY,n;S: CObFdISSTOt7FRS: ;JO[~
1~ASF'raP: GO;+~dISSIO:~IF.ItS: L~l1FLJP:S, PAFiANO~ ~70HI1SON
I~d L9I'lfII:SS S+1f~RFX~^~ I}r~ve hereunto set my fL~nd this 2Ath day oE :Iov~Ues,
1975. ~
.t.(/
S/Aletha Burgess
SEC~~7\RY PRO Tf7•PO?~7; -• -
A]AHEYM1'1 CITY PLA•T1I,1G Cbt~T~'Q~SICR~I
-2- RFSOLI7PION NO. PC75-~247