PC 75-26.d A~ ~
RESOLUTION N0. PC%5-26
A RESOLUTION OF 1'HE At~AHEIN CITY PLANNING COMMISSIAN DENYING
ANO RE~QMMFNDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
AMAHEICI DENIAi. OF REQUEST FOR STREET
INAME CHANGE - STATE COLLEG[ 60ULEVARD
~IHEREpS, a zequesz was sabmitted by the President of the California State
Univer56ty aL Fuller~on proposfing to change the name of State Coll•ege Boulevard
to UnAVersity Bs~ulevard, extendJng ChrouQh t.he ci[ies of Anaheim and Fullerton
to its 'term9n~s at Imperial Highway; an~
~1HER"E/~S, a previaus rzquest fof ~he sub}ECt name change was considered by
the Anaheim City C~uncif and on NbvPmber 14y 1972, 1he malority on said Councii,
reroembRrimg the name ofi the street had 'oeQn chan•ged from Placentia Avenue to State
College Bou?evard anpsa~ximately tem ye.a;rs prior, were opposed xo any further change
of the name on 'the basis of the sY<pense property owners and businessus wouid ?ncur
~iy such a cha~ge and, Yhe.reupon, dec.ITned scheduling a public hearing on the is5ue;
however, Councilman Tham (presentl~ the MayorJ~ reyuested that the record show that
he did not oppose the holding of a ~publ'fc hearing on the request; and
WHER€AS, ihe Anaheim Ci2y Planriing Commission did hold a`ubli6 hearing a[
the City N~11 in the Lity ~f Anaheim oro February 3, ~975, at 1:30 p.m., naticc
ot' sairb p~ubl~G h~aring t,s~ing been duly given as req~ui~ed hy law and in accorda!ice
wixh t'he prov~sion~ of tY~~ Anaheim Mun(cipal Code, to hear and conslder evidence
Sor a»d agait~5t safd proposal an~J to investigate ancl make findi~gs ancl recor.!~endations
tn cunne~ctior therew~th; ~nd
WHEREAS, ~akd Ldrtiraissinn afier~due inspect6on, in~>estigaCion and study made
by itself and in its ~enalf, and after-;iue consideratiort of all evidence and reports
af~er~ed a: satd pub~ii: hear~n~y, 1~0E5 •HEREBY FIND:
D. That 'Ehree 1;3) ~~tte~s we~e received in oppasition to the pcoposed street
mairr~ ch~nge.
Z, Th~t six (6} n~ersans apWer~red at said Hublic hearing i~ opposition tc the
prr~p~seci ~stra:eC nan~ c~hanye, rep:ese~ting approximately ten (10) persons
pi•esent in c,ppos•itOon,
3, 7hat undc;e expenses would he incurred to the City of An<~heim for new street
ider+tification~stg.rrs, incl~-~ding st~~dard street name si,yns and mast-arm
street n~me sigms attacihed to traffic signal standards.
4~ Thati b~~5ir,eSSes and e~esidents along State College Boulevard would incur undue
expens~s ~ar new check.s, stationery, advertising brochures, forms, etc.
~, 7hat there would be confusSon during the transition period ~f several years.
b„ that the reasons Frr the pr~posal are not adequate.
~Ip;~?, 1'HERErt~RE, fiE YT Rf5i:WED that the Anaheim City Planning Commission does
herc~~,y deny ane' s~corr~nene~s to the City Council denial of request for street name
change for State College Boulevard, on the basis of the foregoiny findings.
`HE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is signed and approved by me thi 3rd~3y of February,
1975. ~~
HA RMAN AN E CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
ATTEST;
~ ' .~ ,~ ~~,J
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
RFSOLUT)ON 'N0, .~c75-z6
~
--;~ '
~
~
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, Patricia B. Scanla~, Secretary of the City Planning Commission of the City of
Anaheim, do hereby certify that 'the foregoing resolution,was passed and adopted
at a meetiny of the City r^lanning Commission of the City of Anaheim, held bn
February 3, 1975, at 1:30 o'clock p.m., by the foli~v:ing vote of the members thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: FARANO, GAUER, JOHNSON, KING, MORLEY, TOLAR
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ,
ABSENT: CUMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSTAINi COMMISSIONERS: HERBST
IN WITNE55 WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 3rd day of February, 1975.
~~~~~J~ ,~n~~,N-/
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
-Z- RESOLUTION N0. PC75-26