PC 75-52RESOLUTION N0. Pc75-52
A RESOLlITION OF THE L'ITY PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
THAT PETITION FOR VARIANCE N0. 2677 BE GRANTE~.
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim did receive
verified Petition foF Variance from ANNETTA CASELLA., 3030 BuYterfield, Orange,
California ':•2667 (Owner)• 5. M. ROBINSON, 8470 Garden G ro~•e Boulevard, Garden
Grove, California 92644 (Agent) of certain real prop~rty situated in the City
of Amaheim, County of Orange, State of California, described as:
The South 220.~0 feet ~f the East 203.00 feet, measured from the centerlines c'
the streets, of Lot 7 i:i Block 5~f the Golden State Tract as shown on a Map
recorded in book 4, pages 66 and 67 of Miscellaneous Maps, rpcords of Orange
County, California; and
WHER~AS, tF~e City Planning Commission did hold a puLlic hearing at the Clty
liall in the City of AnaF.eim on March 3, 1975, at 1:30 p.m., notice of said p~~~lic
hearing having been duly given as required by law and in accordance with the
provisfons of the Anaheim Municipal Code, Chapter 18.03, t~ hear and consider
evidence for anJ against said proposed variance and to investigate and make indings
and recommendations in connection therewith; and
WHEREAS, said Commission, after du~ inspection, investigation, ~+nd stud~ made
by itself and in its behalf, and aFter due consideration of all evidence anr
rt:ports offered at said hearing, does find and determine *.r~e followin9 fact.:
l. That the petitioner requests the folluwing waivers from the Anaheia
Municipal Code, to permit the continued operation of an equipment rental f~cility:
a. SECTION 18.61.063•~11 - Minimum fro~[ setback. (50 feet re~u'red;
1Ti feet existing
b. SECTION 18.61.066.03? - Re uired tree landsca in .(2 trees ~equired;
none existing
c. SECTION 18.61.06R.030 - Required enclosure of outdoor uses. S-foot
chainlink fence wit,h cedar or redwoo~ slats
required
2. That Waivers 1-a, I-b and 1-c, above-~~entioned, are hereby grar.•,~d for a
cime limitation of one (1~ year, on the basis that the petitioner demons•rated
that an extreme hardship would be created if said waivers were not grant~ i.
3. That tlie Planning Commission determfned there shall be no outdo~~ storage
or dispiay permitted within the required 5~-foot minimum front setback aieas nor
under the canopies.
4. That the petitioner stipulated that the trash storage areas wilf be re-
located and provided in accordance with approv~d plans on file with the C fice
of the Director of Public Works.
5. That there arr. exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or con 7tions
applicable to the property involved or to the in:ended use of the propert that
do not apply generally to the praperty or class of use in the same vicini y and
zone.
6. That the requested variance is necessary for the preservation an~ enjoy-
ment of a substantial property right possessed by other property in the s:ne
vic~nity and zone, and denied to the property in question.
7, That the requested varianr.e will not be materially detrimental tc the
public welfare or injurious to the proper:y or irttiprovements ln such vicini;y and
zone in which the property is located.
8. That no one indicated their presence at said p~blic hearing in opoosition,
and no correspondence was receivc:d in opposition to s:iliject petition.
RESOLUTION N0. PC75-52
NVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FiNDiNG:
That the Director of Development Services has determined that the proposed
activity falls within Che definition of Section 3•Ol, Class 1 of the City oF
A.naheim Guidelines to the Requirements for an Environmental impact Report and is,
cherefore, categorically exempt from the requirement to file an EIR.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning Commission
does hereby grant subject Petition for Variance, upon the following conditions
which are hereby found to be a necessary prerequisite to the proposed use of the
subject property in order tc preserve the safety and 9eneral welfare of the
Citizens of the City of Anaheim:
1. That subject property shall be developed substantially in accordance
with plans and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim marked Exhibit
No. 1; provided, however, that the trash storage areas shall be relocated and
provided in accordance with approved plans on file with the Office of the Director
of Public Works, as stipulated to by the petitioner.
2. That Condition No.l, above-mentioned, shall be complied with within a
period of ninety (90) days from date hereof, or such further time as the Planning
Cor~~mission may grant.
3. That ther~• shali be no outdoor storage or display permitted under the
canopies nor within the required 50-foot minimum front setback areas.
4. That a time limitation of one (1) year shall be granted for the use of
the subject property, after which time and upon request by *_he petitianer,
considerat~.o~ may be given to an extension of Yime.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is signed and approved by me this 3rd day of March,
1975. .
C A, A M C ANN I NG COM~1 I SS I ON
ATTEST:
~ ~ ,~ ~~~
SECRETARY, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMh115SI0N
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, Patricia B. Scanlan, Secretary of the City Planning Commission of the City
of Anaheim, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted
at a meeting of the City Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim held on March 3,
1975, at 1:30 p.m., by the following vote of the members thereof:
AYES: COMPIISSIONERS: FARANO, GAUER, JOHNSON, KING, HERBST
NOES: COMMISSIONCRS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMiSSI0NER5: MORLEY, TOLAR
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, i have hereunto set my hand this 3rd day of March, 1975•
~ • ~~~
SE'RETARY, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
-2- RESOLUTION N0. PC75-52