PC 76-114rm
,/.
~ ~
RESOLUTION N0. PC7F-114
A RESOLUTIQM OF THE ANAHEIH CITY PLANWING C0~IHISSIOtI
RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY CQUMCIL OF THF CITY QF AtIAHEIM
TNAT PFTITION FOR RECLASSIFICATIOM N0. 7S-7F-3~ BE APPROVED.
1•1HEREAS, the Anaheim City Plannin9 Commisslon did receive a verified
Petition for Reclassification from JUDITH LEE GAINER, c/o ROBERT A. PIERCF, 5?^1 E.
Randolph Street, Los Angeles, California 9~~4~ (O~~mer); SUtIRUR.ST DEVELOPMENT, I~~C.,
720 5. Euclid Street, Suite 3, Anaheim, California 92a02 and DALF K. PRICE & ASSOf,,,
143o S. Village Way, Suite G, Santa Ana, California 92703 (Agents) of certain real
property situated in tha City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of Califnrnia
described as:
THAT PORTTON Of- SECTTON 1, 70WNSHIP 4 50UTIi, RANGE 9 WEST~ IN THE LANO
A~~OTTE[> TU .:UAN YORBA, [N THE CITY OF ANAk~IM;, COUNTY OF ORANGE„ STATE
OF CA~IFORNIA. AS DESCRIBED YN THE FINAL DECREE OF PARTITION OF THE
RANCt~O 5AN'?IAGO DE SANTA ANA~ WHiCH WAS ENTERED SEPTEMBER 12y 1868
IN F300K "k3"., PAGE 410 OF JUDGMENTS OF 1HE DISTRIf.T COURT Ur' int :/TH
~UDiCTAL dISTRICT (N AN~ FOR I_OS ANGELES COUN7Y~ CALIFORNIA~
DESGRIf3ED WITH REFERES~i~E TO A MAP OF SURVEY FILED ;~! BOOK 12o PAGE 21
RECORD OF SURVEYS- IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID ORANGE
COUN7Y; AS FOLLOWSa B~GINNIN6 AT A 2 INCH IRON PIPE MARKING, AN ANGLE
DEED TONWALTEROMTHPETITFOLS~ARECORDEDESEPTEM8ERC23gED941~PINCB00K OlOgHE
PAGE 421, OFF[CIAL RECORDSo IN THE OFFICE OF 1'HE COUNTY RECORDER OF
SAID ORANGE COUNTY~ SAID ANGLE POINT I3E1F~G AT THE SOUTHWESTERLY TERMINUS
OF THAT CERTAIN COURSE IN SAID DEED DESCRI.BED AS "NORTH 65°40'40" EAST
1689.,20 FEET"~ SAID ANGLE POINT ALSO BEING THE MOST SOUTHERLY CORNER
OF THE 52~518 ACRE PARCEL SHOWN ON THE MAP ABOVE MENTIONED~ pND RUNNING
THENCE ALONG THE BOUNDARY OF SAID I.AND OF PETiTFILS~ AND FOLLOWINc'.
COURSES AND DISTANCES~ NORTH 80°42"00" W~ST 100000 FEET TO AN IRON
PIPE; NORTH 9`'18°00" EAST 100,10 FEET TO AN IRON PIPE~ NORTH 80°42°00"
WEST 99..90 FEET TO AN YRON PIPE; SOUTH 9°18'00" WEST 100,10 FEET
TO AN IRON P1PE; NORTH 80°Lt2°00" WEST 310,27 FEET TO AN IRON PIPE,
NORTH 3C°32"17" WEST 489,61 FEET TO A POINT IN SAID BOUNDARY; THENCE
LEAVING SAID BOUNDARY NORTH 83°43°58" EAST 298091 FEET; THENCE NORTH
5~43"02" tJE~T 372a00 FEET~ 7HENCE NORTH 46°02~38" EAST 49,91 FEET~
7HENGE SOUThf 47°07°05" EAST 95>8~ rE~T; THENCE NORTH 62°16°25" EAST
235„85 F'EET TO A 2 INCH YRbN PIPf: MARKING, AN ANGLE POINT IN THE
EASTERLY BOUNDARY OF THE LAND QESCRIBED IN 7HE DEED TO ALF"REO H,W~
STECHERT AND WiFE, RECORDED SEPTEMBER 14, 1944 IN DOOK 1268 PAGE
383~ OFFICIAL RECORDS~ IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID
ORATG~ER~TAINYCOURSE INGSAIDOBOUNDARYGDESCRiBEDOASH'E'SOIITHE24~075 OF
COURSE54AND D15TANCESENSOUTHOO°53A40"EEASTR312O~78NFEET TOEAF2LINCHNG
IRON PIPE, SOU1'li 44°34°40" EAST 227015 FEET TO A 2 INCH'iRON PIPE;
$OUTH i'~21'02" EAST 511,11 FEET TO TNE POINT OF BEGINNINGa
;A:C~ '..+VU l; SHOIJN AS A 9.,583 ACRE PARCEL ON A MAP FILED IN fi00K 62
~•A•:,[ 26 OF RECQRD OF SURVEYS IN THE OFFICE OF SAID COUNTY' OF ORANGE~.
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did hold a pubiic hearing at the City
Hall in the City of Anaheim on June 7, 1976, at 1:30 p.m., notice of said public
hearing having been duly given as requlred by law and in accordance with the
provisicns of the Anaheim Municipal Code, Chapter 1p.03, to hear and consider
evidence Tor and agalnst said proposed reclassification and to investigate ~nd make
finding:, and recommendations in connection therewith; and
RESOLUTIO~! N0. PC7f~-S14
~
r..~ ~ r.
~ ~
WHEREAS, said Cor~mission, after due inspection, investig~tion and stu~iv m~de
by itself and in its behalf, and after rlue considerati~n of all eviAP~ze and r~nnrts
offered at said hearin9, does find and determine the folloa~ing facts:
1. That the petitloner proposes a reclassification of the above-descrihe~!
proper[y, from the RS-A-43,nno(sr,) (RESIDENTIAL/Ar,RICULTURAL - SCF.~~IC cnR~inn~.
OVERLAY) ZONE to the RS-HS-22,O~Q(SC) (RESIDENTIAI., SIN~LE-FAHILY HILLSI~F - Sr,FpllC
CORRIDOR OVERLAY) ZQhIE.
2, That the Anaheim General Plan designates suhject qroocrty f~r lovr
density residential land uses.
3. That the proposed reclassification ~f subJect property is necessary
and/or desirable for the orderly and proper develnpment of the community.
4. That the proposed reclassificat.ion ~f suhject property does rronerly
relate to the zones and thelr permitted uses lot:ally estahlish~d in closr. prnximity
to subJect property and to the zones and their pernittr_d uses aenerally estahlished
.throughout the community.
5. That the proposed reclassiftcation of subject oroperty renuirrs the
dedication and improvement of abutting streets in accordance o-iith the Circulatinn
Element ef the General Plan, due to the anticipatPd incrr_ase in traffic ~•~hich will be
generated by the intensification of land use.
6. That the petitioner stipulated to compliancr. r~ith the regulations
pertaining to tree preservation in the Scenic Corridor Zone Overlav.
7. That iC was determined that conditional deriication of easements for
riding and hiking trails on t!ie subJect property shall be provided as required and
aoproved by the City of Anaheim.
II, That two (2) c~ncerned area residents appeared at said puhlic hearing;
and no correspondence was received in oppositior to subJect petition.
:IJV I Ro!lMEtaTAL 111P~CT REPOR.T F I IID I ~If.,;
That Environmental Impact Report No. 177, having been considered this ciate
by the Anaheim City Planning Commission and evidence, hoth written and oral, havinn
been presented t~~ supplement sald draft EIR No. 177, the Planning.Commission believes
tha± ~aid draft EIR. ~lo, i%7 does conf~rm to the City and State f,uidelines an~i thr
State of CaliFornia Environmental Quality Act and, based upon such informati~n, does
hc:a'eby recommr.nd tb the City Council that they certify said EIR No. 177 is in
cumpliance witli sald Environmental Quality Act.
tlQU; THERF.FGRE, BE IT RESOLVE~ that the Anaheim City Plannin9 Commissirm
does hereby ~ecor~mend to the City Council of the City of llnaheim that subject
PetfYton for Reclassification be approved and, by so doing, tha[ Title tn-l.oninn ~f
the Anaheim Mun?cipal Code be amended to exclude the above-described pronerty from
the RS-A-43,O~n(SC) (RFSIDENTIAL/Ar,RICiILTURAL - SCE!dIC CORRIDDR f1VERLAY) ZONE and to
incorporate said descrlbed property into the RS-HS-22,~~4(SC1 (RF.SI~E~ITI~L, SItJ~LF-
FAMIlY NILLSIDE - SLENiC CQRRIDQR OVFRLA'f) ZO~IE upon the follo~•~in~ conditions ~•~hich
are hereby found to be a necessary prerequisite to the proposecl use of suhJect
property in order to preserve the safety and general welfare of the Citizens of the
City ^f Anaheim:
1, That the owner of subJect property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the
appropriate park and recrea;ton in-Iteu fees as determined to be a~pr~priate by thr.
City Council, said fees to be paid at the time the building permit is issued.
2. That drainage of sald property shall be dispose~f of in a Manner
satisfactory to the City Ergineer, ff, In the preparation of the site, sufftcie~t
grading Is required to necessitate a grading pc~rmit, nn i•iork ~n gradiny will be
permitted between October 15th and April 15th unless _~11 required off-site dr~inage
facillties have been lnstalled and are operatlve. Positive assurance shall he
provided the City that such dreinage facilities riTil be completed prlor to ~ctoher
15th, Necessary right-of-way for off-site dralnage fac111ties shall be dedic~te~1 t~
the City, or the City Council shall have tnitiated condemnatlon proceedin9s therefor
(the costs of which shall be borne by the developer) prior to the commencement aF
gradtng operations. The requir~d drainage fa<:ilities shall he of a size and type
sufficien~i to carry• runoff waters o-Igtnacing `rom h>gher pronerties through said
property to ultimate d(sposal as approved F:y thc City F.nginccr: Said dr~inacte
facil?tles shall be the first item of construction and s:!all be campleted and bc
-2- RF.SOLUTION N0. PC7(+-lili
d• ~ ~
• functional throughout the tract and from the doomstream boundary of the proaerty t~
the ultimate point of dtsposal prior to the issuance of any final building
inspections or occupancy permits. Drainage district reimbursement agreements may be
made avaiiable t,o the developers of said property upon their request.
3. That grading~ excavation, and all other construc*_ion activities shall
be conducted in such a manner so as to minimize the possibility of any silt
originating from this proJect being carried into the Santa Ana River by storm water
or~ginating from or flowtng through this proJect.
4. That the owner(s) of subJect property shall pay appropriate dralnage
assessment fees to the City of Anaheim as determined by the City Engineer prior tn
issuance of a building permit.
$. That fire hydrants shall be installed and ~narged as required and
determined to be necessary by the Chief of the fire Department prior to commencement
of s*ructural framing.
6. That approprtate water assessment fees as determined by the Director af
P,ublic Utilities shall be paid to the City of Anaheim prior to the issuance ~~f a
building permit.
7, That the removal of any spectman trees shall be submitted for revieta by
the Planning Department and subJect to the regulations pertaining to tree
prQServation in the Scenic Corridor Zone Overlay.
II, That subJect property shall be developed substantially in accordance
with plans and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim marked E~hibit No. 1;
provided, however, that conditional dedication shall be made for equestrian trails
easements, as may be required and approved by the City. said dedication being
conditioned upon whether a precise "Riding and Hiking Trails Plan" has been adoptrd
by the City prior to City Louncit approval of the final ~ract map on suh_ject
property.
THE FOREGOIPlG RESOLUTION is signed and approved by me this 7th day of
June, 1976,
~
CHA I RM , APIAH[ I C I TY PLAPIN I tlf COMM 1 SS I 0~!
ATTEST: ~
~~~,~,~~.~
SECRETAR , AtJAHE IM C I TY PLIINN I NG COMH I SS I ON
STATE OF GAL I F~9RP! i A )
COUNTY OF ORANi:,E )ss.
LITY OF APlAHEII~t )
I~ Patricia B. Scanlan, Secretary of the City Planning Commission of the
City of Anaheim, do hereby certify that the foregoing res:slution aias passed and
adoptad at a meeting of the City Planning Commtssion of the City of Anaheim, held on
June 7, 1976, at 1:30 p.m., by the following vote of the members thereof:
AYES: COMMlSSIONERS: B11RtJE5, HERBST~ JOHP150N, KING, MORLEY~ FARAtdO
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NO~JE
AbSENT: C011h11 SS I ONERS: TOLAR
IN WITNE55 WHERCOF, t have hereunto set my hand this 7th day of June, 1~7~.
~~.7~~~~Qwc.~d~sc~
5~CREfAR , ANAHEIM CIT PLAtItJING CQMMISSI~~N
_3_ ' RESOLUTION N0. PC75-114