PC 76-116~ ~
RESOLUTION N~, PC7Fi-ltF>
A RESOLUTIOW QF THE ANAHEIM CITY PLANNIti, COMMIS;,IOtI
THAT PETITIOtI Ff1R C~tIpITIONAi. USE PERMIT PlO, 1~?.5 RE ~RAIITFD.
WHEREAS, the Anaheim Lity Planni~g Commission did receive a verifie~i
Petition for Conditional Use Permit from MENNEtJ IPlD~JSTRIES~ INC., 42R W, l~th Street,
Long Eeach, California ?~313 (Owner); NEIL 14ADIr,A!~, P13 S, Hagnolia Avenue, Anaheim,
California 42A05 ~A9ent) of certain real property siCuated in the City of Anaheim,
Cou~ty of Qrange, State of California described as:
Those portions of Lot 3~t of Tract Plo. 4;57, in the City of Anaheim, County of
Orange, State of California, as shown on a map recorded in book t°~, pages !!? anrt
48 of Itiscellaneous Maps, records nf said Qrange County, described as foll~~ts:
PAP,CEL 1: Parcel 3 as sho~an on a map recorded in book 47, page 13 nf Parcel
tlaps, records of said Orange County.
WNEREAS, the City Plann?nct Commission did hold a public hearing at thP City
Hall in the City of Hnahelm on June 7, 1~7ti, at 1:3~ P.m., nntice of said publir.
hearing having been duly given as required hy la~•i and in accorclance ~aith the
provisions of the Anaheim Municipal Cod~, Chapter 1g.Q3, to hear and consider
evidence for and against said proposed conditional use an~! to investigate and mal:e
fi~dings and recommendations in connection therewitli; and
w4EREA5, said Cr,mmission, after due inspection, Investi9ation and study made.
by itself and in its ~ehalf, and after due consideration of all evidence and reports
offered at said hearing, does find and determine the follaa~ing facts:
t. That the proposed use is properly one for ~•~hich a conditional use
permit is authorized by Code Seriion 1g.~t4.Q5~.~1~, to a~it: permit on-sale alcoholic
beverages in a lodge.
2. That the proposed use is hereby granted for a period of two (2} years,
subject to Planning Commission revie~a end consideration for an extensinn of tine,
upon written request by the petittoner, said time limitation bein9 to determine
whether thP use has been detrimental to the adjacent residential propertie.s hecause
of possible increases in traffic and/or noise.
3. That the proposed use, as granted, will not adversely affect the
adjoining land uses and the growth and development of the area in ~ohich it is
proposed to be located,
4. That the size and shape of the site proposed for the use is ade~uate to
allow the full development of the proposed use, as granted, in a manner not
detrimental to the particular ~rea nor to the peace, health, safety, and gr.neral
welfare of the Citizens of the City of Anaheim,
~. That the Conditional Use Permtt, as grantc~l and under the conditions
imposed, will not be detrimental to the peace, health, safety and general
welfare of the Citizens of the City of Anaheim.
6. That five (5) persons appeared, representing s(x (~) persons present at
said public hearing in opposition; and two (2) letters were reccived in opposition tn
subJect petition.
EtJV I ROtJMEN'tAL I MPACT REPORT F 1 PID t Nr, ;
That the Director of the Planning Department has dete~mined that the
proposed activity falls viithin the definition of Section 3.01, Class 1, of the City
of Anaheim Guidelines to the•Requirements for an Environr~ental Impact Report and is,
therefore, categorically exempt from tfie requirement to file an EtR,
WOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planr.ing Commission
does yereby grant subJect Petitton for Conditio~al ~)se Permit, upon the f~ilowing
conditions ~ahich are hereby found to be a necessary prerequisite to the proposed usP
of the subJect property in order to preserve the safety and general welfare of .the
Citizens of the City of Anaheim:
RESOLUTIQN NQ. PC7F-11F
~ ~~
1. That sub_ject property shall he develope~ substantially in accordance
with plans and specifications on file with the City of Anahelm marke~ Exhibit tJo. 1.
2; That, in order te determine tahether any adverse r.ffects ~~ill result
fram the granting of the proposed use, the Planning Commission grants sa7d use for. ~
period of two (2) years~ after which time, and upon written requ..st hy the
petitioner, consideratiori may be given ~s to whether the use 5hould be extenciecl.
THE FOREGOING RESq~UTI01d is signed and approved by me this 7th,day of
June, 1976. /
~ ~
CHAIRM J, ANAHEI't CITY PLA"1~11PlG COMMISSION
ATTEST:
~lt~~~/~/ ~~Q.~~CJ
SECRETARY, /1~IAHFIH CITY PLANNI"IG C~NMISSI~r~
STATE Qf CALIFORt71A )
COUtlTY OF ORAtd,E )ss.
CITY OF ANAHE111 )
1, Patricia B. Scanlan~ Secretary of the City Planning Commisston of the
City of Anaheim, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and
adopted at a meeting uf the Clty Plannir~g Commisston of the City of Anaheim, held on
June 7, 1976, at 1:30 P.m., by the following vote of the memhers thereof:
AYES: CQMMISSIONERS: HFRBST, JOHPISON, Kit~r,, MORLFY, TOLAR, FARAtI~
tJOES: COMMISSIONERS: BAR~JES
ADSENT: COMMISSIOPlERS: tlOPlE
IPI WITtlESS WHEREOF, I have hereunt•o set my hand this 7th day of June, 1~7~.
' '~,,~,~~,~,,~
SECRETARY, APIANEI!1 CITY PLA~I~;INf; CQMNI55I~II
-Z- RE59LUTIOh; N0. PC7F-116