PC 76-147, ~. ~ ~
•
RESQLIITIOt~ N0. PC7F-1~~7
A RFSOLUT I011 OF THF. AtIAHE 1M C ITY PLAPlII I ti , CQt1M 1551 ~!1
THAT ~'FTITInq F~R C(1~IDITiONAL ttSE PERMIT N~. 1f4~ BE GRAMTED.
WtIEREAS, the Anaheim City Planntnq Commi;sion did r~ceive a verified
Petition for Conditional Use Permit fr~m ORAN~ETFIQRPE PLAZA, LTD., 2152 Dunont ~rive,
Irvine, California ^2715 and fi0PK111S DE\~CL~P`1EHT LO'1PANY, 5303 llvocado, Suite 7.25,
Newport (~each, California °2F~o (Owners) af certain real p".~;~erty situated in the
City of Anahcim, County of Orange, State of California descrihed as:
That portion of those certain parcels ~f land shown as "Max Bayha R.~i59 Acres"
and "1lernine Bayha Lowe 7.8~f, Acres". as ner map filed in Rook 7, page 12 of
Records of Survey, in the office of the County Recorder ef sal~! f.ounty, shown as
Lnt 2 on the Parcel Hap recorded in Rook 74, paae 17 of Parcel Ma~s i~ s~id
office ~f thr. County Recorder.
That portion of those certain parcels of land shown as "M~x P~yha 8.~~52 Acres"
and "Hr.rmine Bayha La~e 7.~nr, Acres", as per map filed in Bool; 7. pePP ~2 °`
(tecords of Sur~iey, !n the office ~f the County RPCOrder of said County, sh~am as
Lot 3 on the Parcel Hap recorded in Book 7h, pa9e 17 of Parcel ~laos in said
office of the County Recorder.
WNERF.AS~ the City Plsnntng Commission did hold a puhlic hearing at the City
Ffall in the City of Anaheim on August 7., 1°7~. at 1:3~ p,m., notice ef said puhlic
hearing having been duly given as requirr.d by law and in accor~fance with the
provisions of the Anaheim !lunicipal Code, Chepter 1f~.03, to hear and consider
evidence for and against said proposed conditional use and to invr.stigate and m~l:e
findings and reccxnmendations in connection therewith; and
WNEREAS, setd Commission, after ~fue inspection, investigatinn and study m~+de
by !tself and in its behalf~ and after• due consideration of all evi~iPnce and reports
offered at said heartng, d~es find and determine the follor~ing facts:
1. That the proposed use is properly one for which a conditional use
pernit is authorizeci by Code Section 1t~.4~i.050.~1~, 'to wtt: permtt on-sale be^_r ane'~
o~inc in a restaurant.
Z. That the petitioner stipulated that no bar or cocktail lounge tr
proposed, ~nd that the sale ~f beer and wine will be In conjunctlon with the servin~
of ineals only.
3. Th~at Lhe ~+roposed use will not ~dverscly affect thc adJolning land uses
and the growth a~d development of the area in which it ts proposed to be located.
k. That the size and shape of thc site proposed for the use is adequate to
allow the full devclopnent of the propnsed use in a manner nnt detrimental to the
particular area nor to the peace, health, safety, and general welfare of the Cftizens
of the City of Anaheim,
5. That the nr:~nting of the Conditional Use Permit, under the conditinns
imposed, will not be deCriciental to the peace, health, safety, and general welfare of
the Citizens of the City of An~heim.
6, That no one inclicated their presence at said public hearin9 in
oppositic~~; and no correspondence was received in opposition to subJect petttlon.
EIIVIR(1"IMEIITAL IHPALT REP~RT FIqDI1JG: Thai tNe Director of the Planning Department
has eterm ned t at t e proposed ac~tlvlty falls within tfie def{nition of Snctton
3.01, Class 1, of the Ctty of Anaheim Gutiielines to the Requirements for an
Environmental Impact Report ~nd is, therefore, categorlcally exempt from the
requlrement to file an Ein.
~101•1, THEREF~RF., BE IT RE50LVED that the Anaheim Ctty Planning Commission
does hereby grant subject Petition for Co~ditional Use Permit, upon the following
conditions which are herehy f~~und t~ be a necessary prerequistte t~ the proposed use
ef thc subject property in order to Preserve the safety anrl general welfare of the
Litizens of the CiCy of Anaheim:
RESOLUT10~1 IJO. PC76-147
,, .
~ ~
1. That the subject property shall be developed substantially in
accordance with plans and specifications on file with the City of Anahein marked
Exhibit Nos. 1, 2 and :i.
2. That the sale of beer and wine shall be in conjunction with the serving
of ineals only, as stipulatecl t~ by the petitioner.
THE FORE~OItJG RESOLUTION is signed and approved by me this 2nd day of
Au9ust, 1~76. •
~~~ a~
~CHAIRMAN PRO TEMPORE
ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
ATTEST:
~ , /~~".Cti~t~
SECRE A , AN HE1~1 I~ LANPlIPI, C~~11 S~lOfT
STATE OF CALIFORtJIA )
COUNTY OF ORAtdGE )ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
i, Patricia B. Scanlan, Secretary of the Anaheim Ctty Planning Commission,
do hereby certify that the foreg~ing resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting
of the Anaheim City Planning Commission, held on August 2, 1975~ at 1:3~ P•m., by the
following vote of the members thereof:
AYES: CONt415SI0NERS: DARDlES, FARAr~O~ HERBST, KIN;~ MORLEY, TOLAR
PlOES: CONNISSIONERS: NONE
Af3SENT: CONI11 SS IONERS: JO{INSOtI
IN 1JITNESS WHEREOF, 1 have hereunto set my hand this 2nd day of August~l°7h.
~~~: ~ , ~ f~-~Ls
SECRkTARY, ANAHEIM C~ LANNIDIG CO~IOPI
_2_ RESOLUTION N0. PC76-147