PC 76-162~ ~
RESOLUTION N0. PC76-lfi2
A RESOLUTION OF THE ANAHEIH CITY PLANNING CQMM15510N
THAT PETITION FOR RECLASSIFiCATIQN N0. 76-77-13 BE APPROVED.
NHEREAS, the Anaheim City Planning Commisslon dId reeelve a verified
Petition for Reclassification from WILLIAM E. AND JOY L. DITMAR~ 29~1 W. Ball Road,
Anaheim, California 92AO4 (Owners); J. H. HEDRICK AND CO.., 9QQ 5. San Gabriel
Boulevard~ San Gabriel. California 9177fi (Agent) of certatn real pro~erty situated in
the City of Anaheim, County of Orange~ State of California described as:
THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTH HALF OF THE SQUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SQUTHIJEST QUARTER
Of SECTION 13, TOWNSHIP 4 SOUTH~ RAPlGE ii WES7, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM~ COUNTY OF
ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS SAID SECTION IS SHOWN ON A MAP RECURDED IN BOOK
51 PAGE il OF MISCELLAt~E0U5 MAPS IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID
COUNTY,
EXCEPT THEREFRON THE WE57' 3 ACRES THEREOF.
AL50 EXCEP7 THEREFROM TNAT PORTlON THEREOF AS CONVEYED TO VANDRUFF HOME5~ INC.~ A
CORPORATION BY DEED RECORDED MhRCN 10, i955, IN BOOK 299o PAr,E 359 OF OFFICIAL
RECORDS.
ALSO ~>;CEPT THFREFROM ANY PORTION THEREOF INCLUDED WITHIN BALL ROAD AS EXCEPTED
IN THE DEED TO WILLIAM E. OITMAR~ ET AL~.~ RECORDED FERRUARY 1~ 1Qh2 IN BOQK 59Q5
PAGE 798 OF OFFICiAL RECORDS.
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did hold a public heartnc~ at the City
Hall in the City of Anaheim on August 3~. 197~, at 1:3Q p.m., notice of said public
hearing hav(ng been duly given as required hy law and in accordance with the
provistons of the Anah~tm Municipal Code, Chapter 18.03, to hcnr and coirsider
evidence for and against said proposed reclassification and to investiga+~e ~nd make
findings and recommendations in connection therewith; and
WHEREAS, said Commtsslon. after due inspectton~ Investigatlon and study made
by itself and in its behalf, and after e~ue consideration of all evldence and reports
offerecl at said hearing, does fi~nd and determine the following facts:
1. That the petttioner proposes a reclassification of the above-desc:iber!
property from the RS-A-43~000 (RESIDENTIAL/AGRICULYURAL) ZONE to the RM-4noo
(RESIOENTIAL, MULTIPLE-FAMILY) 20NE.
2. That the Anaheim General Plan ~ieslgnates the subJect property for
medlum-density residential land uses.
3. That the petitioner stfpulated to submltting landscaping plans in
connectfon with the condominium development of the sub)ect property, said plans to
indicate the landscaping throughour, the proJect and~ more particularly, to specify
the size. species~ spacing and location of the plants and trees wtthin the 20-foot
wide landscaped buffer strip adJacent to the north and west property lines abutting
single-family restdences.
4. It was noted, in connectlon wlth the development proposal, that a
variance may be required for any proposed subdivision which may include lots not having
frontage on a dedicated street. '
5. That a tract map shall be requtred ~nd shall be subject to the
atLe~dant Ctty of Anaheim requlrements and cortdltlons, tncludi~g the submtsston and
recordation of C.C. E R's.
6. That the petitioner stip~~lated to submitting fTnel spectfic floor plans
and elevations for the proposed condominium development for Planning Commisslon
revtew and approval prlor to Introduction of an ordinance rezoning subJect property.
7. That the petitioner stipulated to constructin9 a 6-foot high masonry
wall along the north~ we,,t, and east property lines.
8. That the propcsed reclassificatTon of subject property Is necessary
and/or desirable for the orderly and prnper development of the communlty.
RESOLUTION N0. PC76-162
~ ~
9. ' That the pr~posed reclassificatlon of subJect property does properly
relate to the zones and their permttted uses locall~ estahlished in c!ose proximity
to subject property and to the zones and their permitted uses generally established
throughout the cor.rcnunity.
10. That no onr. indicated their presence at said puhlic hearing in
oppositio~; and that no correspondence was received tn oppos',tion to subJect
petitton.
ENVIROPIMENTAL IMPALT REPORT FINDING: That the Anaheim City Planning
Commission does hereby recommend to the City Council of the Ctty of Anaheim that the
subJect proJect be exempt from the requirement to prepare an environmental impact
report, pursuant to the provisio~s of the Callfornla Environmental Quality Act.
NQW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning Commission
d~es hereby recommend to the CiCy Council of the City of Anaheim that subJect
Petition for Reclassification be approved and~ by so doing. that Title ifl-~oning of
the Anaheim Municipal Code be amended to exclude the above-described property from
the RS-A-43,000 (RE5IDENTIAL/AGRICU!_TIIRAL) ZONE and to incorporate said descrlbed
property into the RM-4000 (RESIDENTIAL~ MUI.TIPIE-FAMILY) 20NE upon the folloartng
conditions whtch are hereby found to be a nece~::ary pre~equislte to the proposed use
of subJect property in order to preserve the safety and general ~~e]fare of the
Cttizens of the City of Anaheim:
1. That all englneering requiremen:s of the City of Anaheim along Hall
Road including preparation of improvement plans and Installation of all improvements
such as curbs and gutters, sidewalks, street grading artd paving, dratnage facilltie~
or o[her appurtenant work, shall be complied with as required by the City Engineer
and in accordance with standard plans and specificattons on ftle in the OffTce of the
City Engineer; that street lighting facilities along Ball Road shall be installed as
required by the Director of Public Uttiities, and in accordance with standard
specifications on fite in the Office of the Dtrector of Publtc Utilities; and/or that
a bond~ certificate of deposlt, letter of credit or cash~ in an amount and form
satisfactory to the Ctty of Anaheim shall be posted wlth the City to guarantee the
installation ot the above-mentioned requtrements.
2. That the owner(s) of subJect property shall pay to :ne City of Anaheim
the sum of stxty cents (60C) per front foot along Ball Road for tree planting
purposes.
3. That trash storage areas shall be provided in accordance witli approved
plans'on file with the Offlce of the Director of Publtc Works.
4. That fire hydrants shall be Installed and charged as reauired and
determined to be neeessary by thE Chie'F of the Fire Department prlor to commencement
of structural framing.
5, That subJect property shall be served by underground utilltles.
6. That a 6-foot tiigh masonry wall shalt be constructed along the north.
west and east property lines, as stipulated to by the petitioner.
7. That drainage of subJect property shall be disposed of In a ma~ner
satisfactory to the City Engineer.
8. 7hat the owner of sub)ect property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the
appropriate park and recreatlon in-lieu fces as determined to be approprlate by the
City Councll, sald fees to be wald at the tlme the butldinq permit is issued.
9. That appropriate water assessment fees as deterrnlned by the Director of
Public Utllities shall be pald to the City of Arvahelm prTor to the Issuance of a
butlding permTt.
10, That flnal specific ftoor plans and elevations shall be submitted for
Planning Commission revlew and approval~ as stipulated to by the petit~oner.
il. That landscaping plans shall be submitted for Planntng Commission
approval, sald plans specifying the size~ species, spacing and locatlon of plants and
t~ees ehro~ghout the proJect and~ more particularly~ within the 20-foot wide
landscaped strip adJacent to the north and west property 91nes~ as stipulated to by
the petltioner.
-2- RESOlUT10N N0. PC76-162
~ ~
12. That a ftnal tract map of subJect property shall be submlt:ed to and
appraved by the City Counci) and then be recorded in the Office of the Orange County
Recorder~ said map to be subject to the attendant City of Anahelm requirements and
conditions. (ncludtng the submisslon and recordation of C.C. E R.'s.
13. That subJect property shall be developrd subitantially in accordance
with plans and specifications on flle with the City of Anahe~m marked Exhibit Nos. 1
through 3.
14. Prior to the introduction ot an ordinance rezoning subJect property,
Condition Nos. 1, 2. 1Q and it~ above-mentloned~ shall be comFleted, The provisions
or rights granted by this resotution sh~lt become null and void by actlon of the City
Counci) unless said conditions are complied with within one year fran the date
hereof~ or such further time as the City Louncil may grant.
15. That Condition Nos. 3, 5, 6. 7. and 13. above-mentioned, shall be
complied with prior to final building and zoning Inspections.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION ls signed
Auqust, 1976.
ATTEST: ~
C~G~2~c~/ ~ ~.?~d[~CLtt~
SECRETARY, ANAHEIM CITY pLANhINr, COMMISSION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF QFANRE )ss.
CITY OF At1AHEIM )
I~ Patricla B. Scanlan, Secretary ef the Anaheim City Plann(ng Commission,
do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a meettng
of th~ Anaheim City Planning Commisston, held on August 3~~ 1976, at 9:30 p.m,, by
the followtng vote oF the members thereof:
AY[5: COMP115510NERS: FARANO, HERBST~ KING~ TOLAR, JOHNSQN
NOES: ' COMMISSIONERS: BARNES
ABSENT: COMMi5510NER5: MORLEY •
IN WiTNESS WfiER£OF. I have hereunto set my hand this 30th day af Au~ust 1976.
~~~
SECREfARY~ ANA,H IM CITY PLANN NG COMMISSION
-3- .R~SOLUTION N0. PC7f+-162