PC 76-165~ ~
RESC~_u~rio~~ ~o. PC76-165
A RESOLU710N OF TfIE APlA~1EIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
THAT PETiTION FOR VARIANCE NO~ 283$ BE GRANTED.
WHEREAS, the Anaheim City Planntng ~ommissinn did receive a verified
Petition for Variance from TEXACO-ANANEIM HILLS, INC., 38~ Anaheim Hills Rcac1,
Anaheim, California 92307 (Owners); ANAHEIM HILLS, INC.p 3~0 Anaheim Hills ~oad,
Anaheim, Caltfornia 92807 (Agent) of certain real property sltuated in the City of
Anaheim, County of Oran9e, State of California descrtbed as:
THAT PORTION OF Tt1E LAND ALLOTTED TO PAULA PERALTA DE DOMINf,UEZ~ PARTLY IN THF
CITY OF ANAHEIM, ALL IN THE COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORIVIA, AS DESCRIBED
IN THE FINAL DECREE OF PARTITION OF THE RANCIIO SANTIAGO DE SANTA APJA, WHICH WAS
ENTERED SEPTEMBER 12. 1R68 IN BOOK "B" PAGE 410 OF JUDGMENTS OF THE DISTRICT
COURT OF THE 17th JUDICIAL DISTRICT IN AND FOR LOS ANGELES COUNTY, CALIFOR~IIA,
INCLUDED blITHIN PROPOSED TRACT N0. 94Efi.
WHEREAS, the City Planntng Commission did hold a public he~rin9 at the City
Hall in the City of Anaheim on August 3~, 1976, at 1:30 p.m., notice of said public
hearing having been duly given as required by law and in accordance with the
provisions of the Anaheim Municipal Code, Chapter 18.03, to hear and c~nsider
evidence for and agai~st said proposed variance and to investigate and make findtngs
and reconmendations in connection therewith; and
WHEREAS, said Commisslon, after due inspection, investigatinn and study made
by itse'!f and in its behalf~ and after due consideration of all evidence and reports
offered at said h_aring~ does find and determine the following facts:
1. That the petitioner proposes the following waiver from the: Anahetm
Mu~iciF;al Code, to establish a 64-lot, RS-HS-t0,00Q(SC) subdivision:
SECT~ON 18.24.065.010 - Re uirement that all tots rear on arterial
highways, side-on and 1 ront-on lots proposed)
2. That the above-mentioned waiver ts hereby granted on the basis that a
hardship exists due to the topography and size and shape of the subJect property and~
furthermore, that similar waivers have been previously granted.
' 3, That there a~c~ exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions
~pplicable to the property ircvolve4 or to the intended use of the property that do
not apply generally to the proH~rty or class uf use in the same vicinity and zone.
4. That the req~ested variance is necessary for the preservation and
enJoymenr of a substar~tial proper~y right possessed by other property tn the same
vicinity and zone, and denled to the property in question.
5, That the requested variance will not be materially detrimental to the
public welfare or inJurious ta the property or improvements in such vlcinity and zone
in which the pra~erty is located.
~ 6. That one (t) person appeared at said public hearing in opposition; and
no ;orrespondence was received in opposition to subJect petitton.
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FINDING: That Environmental Impact Report No.
185 (supplementing Master EIR No. 0, having been constdered this date by the
Anaheim City Plarning Commisslon and evidence, both written arvd oral. liaving been
prepared to supplement said draft F_!R No. 185, the Ptanning Commisslon believes that
said draft EIR No. 185 does conform to tha City and State GuTdelines and tlie State of
Californla Environmental Quality Act and, based upon such informatlon. does hereby
recommend to the City Council that they certify satd EIR is In compliance with said
Envtronmental Quality Act.
NOW~ THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVE6 that the Anaheim City Planning Commission
does hereby grant subJect Petition for Variance, upon the following conditions which
are hereby found to be a necessary prerequisite to the proposed use of the subJer,t
property in order to preserve the safe~y and general welfare of tha Citizens of the
City of Anaheim:
RESOLU'~ION N4. PC76-165
;0
~
1, That this Varlance is granted subJect to the completion of
Reclassification Na. 73-74-46 to the RS-HS-iQ,Q00(SC) Zane. naw pending.
2. That subJect property shall be developed substantially in accordance
with plans and specifications on fiie with tfie City of Anaheim marR•~d Exhibit No, i.
August,
ATTEST:
~ti%Z~.67.
SECRETARY~ ANAHEIM CITY PLANIJING CQMMlSSION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORA~~GE )ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, Patricia B. Scanlan, Secretary of the Anaheim City Planning Camrnission~
do hereby certify that the foregoir;y resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting
of the Anaheim City Planning Commission, held on August 30~ 197~~ at 1:30 p.m,, by
the following vote of the members thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BARNES~ FARANO, HERBST~ KING, TOLAR, JOHNSON
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: MORLE'f
THE FOREGOdNG RESOLUTION ls signe~i and approved me this 3~th day of
1976.
CH,4IRMAN~ ANAHE CI Y PLpNNING COMMISSION
IN WITNE55 41HEREOF, I 4~ave fiereunto set my hand this 30th day of August 1976.
~~.-'~,~~,~
SECRE R~ HA EIM CI NNI G COMM 55 ~N
-2- RESOlUTION N0. PC76-165