PC 76-180~ ~
~
RESOLUTION N0. PC76-180
A RESOLUTION OF THE ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMHISSION
THAT PETITION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT N0. 1653 BE GRANTED.
WHEREAS, the Anahelm City I~lanning Commissian d1d recaive a verifled
Potition 4or Condltional Use Permlt fran R. JGSEPH MAAG~ 1761 Ladera Vista Drtve,
Fullerton, Californla 92631 (Owner); ASHWILL-BURKE 6 CO., 1833 S. State College
Boutevard, Anaheim, Californla 928~g ~Agent) of certain real property situated Tn the
C1ty o~' Anaheim, County of Orange, State of Callfornia described ass
PARCEL A: Parcel 4 in thc City of Anehelm, Caunty of Orange, State of
Caitiornia, as shown on a map flled in book 65, page 22, Parcel Maps, in the
office of the Lounty Recorder of said County.
WHEREAS~ the City Planning Commi~sion dld hold a public hearing at the City
Hall in the City of Anahelm an Se,atember 13, ~976, at 1:3~ p.m „ notTce of said
publlc hearing having been duly given as required by law and in accordance with the
provlslons of the Anahefm Municipal Code. Chapter 18,Q3, to hear and consider
evideece fer and agalnst sald proposed corditicmat use and to lnves:igat~ end make
flndings and r~commendetions in eonnection therew~th; and
WNERE115, sald Commission, after due inspectlon, tnvestigntion and study made
by itself and In its behalf, and nfter due consideration of all evidence and reports
offered at said hearing, doee find and dr4ermine the following facts:
1. That Che proposst~ use is properly one for which a conditTonal use
permlt is auChorized by Code Sec:ton 1$.61.Q~y0.340~ to wit: permit a privzte ciub.
2. That thn propo~ed ~se wiil not adversely affect tha adJoining land uses
and the ~rowth and development of the area 1n which It ls proposed to be located.
3. That the stze and shape of thc site proposed for the use is adequate to
allow the fult development of the proposed use in a manner not detrimental to the
particular area nor to the perce, heelth~ safexy, and general welfare of the Citizens
of the City of Anaheim.
4. That the granting of the Condltional Use Permit under the condltions
imposed~ will not be detrimental to the peace, health, safety and general welfare of
ehe ~itlzens of the City of Anahelm.
5. That the petitloner stipulated to maTntaining a sound level nat to
exceed 65 dBA at cha property lines.
6. That the Retl:loner ~tlpulated to obtalning reciprocal parking
agreements with the surrouncfing businesses, to provlde parking 9P8CC4 as needed
during proposed fund-relsing activitles.
• 7, That this conditlonal use !s hercby yrsnted for a one-year time perTod,
subJect to r~vlew and consideraelon for possible extenstons o4 ttme.
$, That the petltioner stlpulated that all of the actlvities of the
proposed club will be conducted inside the buliding and any outdoor u,e will be
condueted nway from the subJect location.
9. That no one lndiceted their presence at said pubilc hearing in
oppositlon; and thet no correspondence was received in opposttton to subJect
petitlon..
I ENVIRONMENTAL IMPAC? REPORT FINDING; That the Direetor of the Planning
' Dapartment has dntermined that the proposed actlvity falts withfn the definltion of
~' Sectton 3.~1r ~~~"-~ ~~ ~f the City of Anefie,~m Guldelines to the Requlrements for an
~ Environmental Impact R~~arc and is, therefore, eategorleally exempt from the
! requlroment to file an EIR.
NQW, THEREFOFtE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Anahelm City Planning Commission
does hereby grant ~ubJect Potition for Condltlonal Usa Permit, upon the following
conditions whlch are heraby found to be a necessary prerequislte to the proposed use
04 the subJect property in ~rder to pres~rve the sat'ety and general welfare of the
Cltixens of the Clty of Anaheim:
RE50LUTION N0. PC76-180
~
1
~ ~
i. That subJect properey shail be developed substantiatiy in accordance
with plans and specificatlons on file with the City of Anaheim marked Exhibit Nos. 1
through 3.
2. Thet the sound generated from thc proposed use shall not exceed 65 dBA
at the property llnes, as stipulated to by tha petitioner.
3, That reciprocal parktng agreements, to provtde adequate parking for the
ectlvities of tha prl~vate club, shall be submitted to and approved by the City
AYtorney's Office and then be }iled and recorded ln the Of41ce of the Orange County
Recorder. as stipulated to by the petlCloner. This conditton sha11 be camplied with
prlor to cortmancement of the activities eu:horized by this r~solutlon.
4, That all of the activitics of the proposed use shall be conducted
inside the building and any outdoor aetivitles shall be conducted away from tha
subJect tocatlon~ as stlpulated to by the petitioner.
5. That this conditlonai use shall be granted for a one-year period of
time, folSowing which time and upon written request by the petitloncr~ an additlonal
period of time mn~~ be granted by the Plar.~~ing Commission.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION i~ slgned and approved me this 13th day of
Septembcr 197b. ~
~ . ~~~ M I i
AT7E Ts
~i~~
R , A N + ~
57ATE OF CALIFORNtA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE )ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, Patricla B. Scanlen, Secretary of the Anaheim City Planning Commission,
do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was passeC and adopted at a meeting
of the Anaheim City Planning Commisslon~ held on Septembe~ 13~ 1976, at 1t30 p.R-, by
the folluwing vote of the members thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BARNES, KING, MORLEY, TOLAR
NOES< COMMISSIONERS; JOHNSON
ADSENT: COMN1551QNER5: FARANO, HERRST
1976.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand thls i3th day of September
~~~~ ~~
OM I N
r
_z_ RESOLUTION N0. PC75-18Q