PC 76-19~ ~
RESOLUTIOPJ t~0. PC7f,-19
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLAI~PJIWG COI~IPIISSIOP~ OF THE CITY OF AfaAHEI~1
THAT PETITIQPI F012 CONUITIOPIAL USE PERMIT f~0. 1577 DE 6RAPlTED.
41H[REAS, the City Planning Commission of tlie City of Anaheim did receive a
verified Petition for Conditional Use Permit Trom ~1R. & MRS. AAROtd Sl~lAIN, P.O. Rox
937, Anahein, California 92505 (Owners); FRAI~CIS ~J, tdEVILLE, P.O. Dox 937, Anaheim,
California 92t305 (Agent) of certain real property situated in the City o` Anaheim,
County or Orange, State of California, described as:
The (Jorth 434.00 feet of the followin9:
aeginning at the Southwest corner of the West half of the Southwest quarter
of tlie Southeast quarter of Section 12, Township 4 South, Ran9e 11 blest, in
the Rancho Los Coyotes as per man recorded in book 51, page 11,
fliscellaneous hlaps, in the office of the county recorder ofi said county,
running thence North along the center of the road f74 feet; thence East 33t?
feet; thence ~outh G74 fe~t; thence 4lest 33~ feet to the point of beqinn~ng.
1411[REAS, the City Planning Commission did hold a oublic hearing at the CitY
Ilall in the City of Anaheim on February ?, 1976, at 1:30 p.m., notice of said .public
hearing having been duly 9iven as required by law and in accordance with the
provisions of the Anaheim P1unicinal Code, Cha~ter 1a.03, to hear and consider
evidence for and against said proposed conditiona'1 use and to invesi:i~ate and make
findings and recommendations in connection theret~ith; and
W1IEREAS, said Commission, after due inspection, investigation and study made
by itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration o` all evidence and renorts
offered at said hearing, does find and determine tlie following facts:
1. 7hat the proposed use is properly one for which a conditional use
perMit is autharized by Code Sections ?~3.44.050.10Q and 13.nn,050.17Q, to wit:
permit an apartment complex for tiie elderly ~~~ith waiver of:
SECTION 1II.06.060.026G - Minimum number o~F arkin snaces. (8?. spaces
re~uired; 39 spaces proposed.
2. That the above-mentioned waiver is hereby 9ranted on the basis that the
Planning Commission has granted similar waivers previousl.y for apartment complexes
for the elderiy because it has been shown such housing comoiexes do not ~enerate as
nany vehicles as typical apartment complexes, and the petitioner indicated there is
adequate open space on the subject property for expansion of the parking areas if a
need arises.
3. That the proposed use is hereby granted in concept, subject to,the
stipulation of the petitioner to submitting revis~d nlans increasing the setback
betvieen the proposed residential struc±ure and the adjacent single-family and
raultiple-family developments to the north and nor~heast and, alsa, qrovidincl a
landscaped buffer in said setback to screen the oroposed use from said adjacent
single-family and multiple-family residential uses; said revision to indicate a
relocaxion of the proposed :^esidential siructure a~proximately 30 feet to the south
to lessen the impact of the proposed 3-story building on the adjacent residential
uses and an adjustment of the parking area locations, as needed; and, furthermore,
said revised plans shall be submitted to the Plannin9 Commission for review anrl
approval prior to the issuance of a building permit.
4, That the proposed use, as granted, ti~~ill not adversely affect the
adjoining land uses and the growth and development of the area in which it is
proposed to be located.
5. That the size and shape of the site proposed for the use is adequate to
allow the full developMent of the proposed use, as granted, in a manner nnt
detrii~l~ntal to the particular area nor to the peace, health, safety, and ~eneral
~aelfare of the Citizens of the City of Anaheim.
6. ihat the Conditional Use Permit as granted and under the conditions
imposed will not be detrimental to the peace, health, safety, and general welfare of
tlie Citizens of the City of Anaheim.
RESOLU7ION N0. PC76-19
7, T~iat thre~e (3) persons appeared at said p~ublic hearing in onnosition;
and no co,•respondence a~as received in opposition to subject petition.
EilViHON~~1Ei~TAL Ii~1PACT REPORT FIIJUII9G
That the Anaiieim City Planninq Commission does herebY recommend to tlie Cit.y
Council of the Cit,y of Anaheim that the subject project be exempt from the
requirements to prepare an environmental impact renort, Pursuant tc the provisions of
the California Environmental Quality Act.
i~OtJ, TIiEREFORE, BE IT P.ESOLVED that the Anaheim Cit,y Planning Com~ission
does hereby grant subject Petition for Conditional Use Permit, uaon the folloviing
conditions tvhich are hereby fnund to be a necessary prerequisite to the oronosed use
of the subject propert,y in order to preserve the safety and general welfare of the
Citizens of the City of Anaheim:
1. That all engineering requirements of the City of Anaheim, along Dale
llvenue including preparation of improvement plans and installation of a11
improvements such as curbs and gutters, side~•ialks, street ~rad;ng and navin~,
drainage facilities, or otVier appurtenant work shall be complied ~•~ith as required by
the City [ngineer and in accordance with standard ~lans and soecifications on file in
the office of the City ~:ngineer; that street lighting facilities along Dale Avenue
sha11 be installed as required by the Director of Public Utilities, and in accordance
witfi standard plans and specifications on file in the Office of the Director of
Public Utilities and that a bond in an amount and form satisfactory to the City of
Anaheim shall be posted wi~th the City to 9usrantee the installation of tYie above-
mentioned requirements.
2. That the o~•mer(s) of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheir~
the sum of GOF per front foot along ~ale Avenue for tree nlanting ~urooses.
3. That trash storage areas shall be provided in accordance with aoproved
plans on file ~-iith the Office of the Director of Public lJorks.
4. That fire hydrants shall be installed and charged as renuired and
determined to be necessary by the Chief of the f•ire Department prior to cor!mencement
of structural framing.
That subject property shall be served by underground utilities.
6. That drainage of subject pr~oerty sha17 be disnosed of in a manner
satisfactory to the Cit,v Engineer.
7. In the event that subject property is to be divided for the purpose of
sale, lease, or financing, a parcel map, tn record the anproved division of subject
oroperty shall be submitted to and aporoved by the ~ity of Anaheim ancl then be
recorded in the office of the Orange County Recorder.
3. That the ovmer(s) of sub9ect property shali pay to the City of Anaheim
the appropriate park and recreation in-lieu fees as determined to be anprooriate by
the City Council, said fee~ to be paid at the time the buildin9 permit is issued.
9, That appropriate water assessment fees as determined by the Director of
Publ~c Utilities shall be paid to the Gity of Anaheim prior to the issuance of a
building permit.
10. That subject qroperty shall be developed subs~antially in accordance
with plans and specifications on file v+ith the City of Anaheim marked Exhibit Plos. 1,
2, 3, and 4; provided, ho~~~ever, that revised nlans shall be submitted for Planninn
Cominission approval prior to the issuance of a building perm~t, as stipulated to by
ttie petitioner; and said plans shall indicate relocation of the proposed apartment
building approximately 30 feet to the south, and shall provide a landscaoed buffer
area along tlie north and northeast prooerty boundaries, and, furtherr~ore, the narking
area locations shall be adiusted to accommodate the foregoi~g.
11. That Condition f~os. 1, 2. and 7, above-mentioned, sha11 be comolied
with prior to the comnencement of the activity autharized under this resolution, or
prior to the time that the building oermit is issued, or ~aithin a neriod of one year
fron date hereof, whichever occu~~s first, or such further +.ime as the Plannin~
Commissior and/or City Council may grant.
_p_ RESOLUTIOtd N0. PC76-19
~ ~
12. That Condition (~os. 3, 5, 5, and 10, above-m~ntioned, shall be comnlied
with prior to final building and zonin9 inspections.
TIIE FOREGOI(JG RESOLUTIOId is signed and approved b,y me this 2nd da,y of
February, 1976.
~
•1 I~! Et E
ANAHEI~1 CITY PLAMWIWG CO'4t1ISSI 'I
ATTEST:
~11.2h.!-u~rt./~
SE E , N t~l C L NII ~~ h 9 SS W
STATE Of CALIFOR(~~IA
COUf~TY OF ORANGE ss.
CITY OF AWAHEI~4 )
I, Patricia B. Scan]an, Secretary of thP City Planning Coeanission of the
City of Anaheim, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and
adopted at a meeting of the City Planning Commission of the CitY of Anaheim, held on
February 2, 1976, at 1:30 p.r~., by the following vote of the members thereof:
AYES: COb111ISSI0WERS: {1ERBST, JOfitdSOt~, KING, TOLAR, MORLEY
NOES: COhit•1ISSIOWERS: f~OWE
~1GSENT: COM!1ISSIONERS: f3ARIJES, FARAPIO
197G.
Itl WITWESS WIiEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 2nd da;~ of Februar,Y,
~'~~o~~ ~`~,oe,.~4-~~
SE RE , I! HEIt1 IT L MNIfIa 'd~1 SS ~!
_3_ RESOLUTION N0. PC76-19