PC 76-204~ ~
RESOLUTION N0. PC76-204
A RESOLUTION OF THE ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
TNAT PETITION FOR RECLASSIFICATION N0. 76-77-4 BE APPROVED.
Wf1EREAS, the Anahelm Clty Pianning Commission did reeelve a verlfied
Petitlon for Reclassificatlon from TOM T. AND CHERRY HIDE~ ~33~ E. Gate Street,
Anaheim. Californla 928Q1 (Owner); STATE-W~DE INVESTORS, INC., 4311 E, 7th Street,
Long Beach, Calitornia 90804 ~Agent) of ccrtaln real property sTtuated in the Clty of
Anahelm~ County of Orange, State of Ca)ifornia described as:
Lot l5 of Tract No. 743 In the City of Anahelm, in the County of Orange, as per
map racordad in book 22~ psge 10 af His:.etlaneous Maps, In the effice of the
County Recorder of sald County.
EXCEP?IN~ TNE({EFR~M that portlon thereof, If any~ grantted to Orange County Flood
Control D1~trict ln deed recorded June 2~i~ 1959 in book 4772, page 188, OffTcial
Records.
WHEREAS, the City Plenning Commisslan did schedule a public hearing at the
City Hall in the City ~f Anahetm on Juiy 19, 1976, at 1:30 p.m „ notice af said
pubilc hearing heving been duly glven as requlred by law tnd in accordance with Che
provisions of the Anahelm Municlpbt Code, Chapter 18.03, to hear and consider
evldence for and against said proposed reclassification and to lnvestigate end make
flndings and recarcnendeilons in connectlon therewfth; said public hearing having heen
continued to the planning Cortmission meeting of October 27, 1976; and
WHEREAS, sald Commis~lon~ after due Inspeetlon, Investigatlon and study made
by Itself and in its behalf~ and after due cnnsideratlon of all evidenee and reports
oPfered at sald hearing, does flnd and determine the following facts:
1. That thn petitloner propnses a reclasslflc++tion or the above-described
property from the RS-A-43,~~0 (Resldentlal, Agriculturat) Zone to the RM-120n
(Residential~ Multiple-Famlly) ionc.
2. That the Anahelm General Ptan desigr~ates the subJect property for
medlum-density residentlal uses.
3. 7hat the proposed reclassification nf sub)ect property Is necessary
and/or desirable for the orderly end proper development of the community.
4, That the proposed reclassificatlon of subJect property does proaerly
relate to the zones and their permitted uses locally established In close proxirnlty
to subJect property and to the zones and thetr permitted uses gennrally e~tablished
throughout the community.
5. That the proposed reciassificatlon of subJect property requlres
Improvmnent of abutting streets In accordance with the Circul~tlon Element of tf~r.
General Plan, due to the anticipated incre;ese in trefflc which will be generated by
the intrnsificatlon of land use.
6. 'ihet two (2) persons appenred~ ~e~~resenting approximately twenty-eight
(28) persons present at satd publlr, hearing •~pposltton; that one (1) lettnr was
received in npFasition; anL 'Mat ?:~. ~i2) ptt'tia~is contial~~in~ a total 04
epproximeteiy forty-three (A3) st;. '~:.~a of Il~C~+, p~0y'f!~9'i; ownars sn~ rssidents In
oppos 1 t tc+n were roc.e.!ved.
ENVIRONMENTAL iMPACT REPOni FINDINGt That the Anah,:';n Clty Planntng
Commisslon does hereby racommend to thc City ~our~::il of the Clty of Anehe1m that a
negatlve dcclaratlon from the .nq~slreme~c to prr_pare on cTVlronmentat tmpact report
be approved for t~e subJect proJecC, pur3uant ko Lhe provisions of the Californta
Envlronmental Quallty Act.
NON, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Anahelm City ?lanning Commission
dons hereby recommend to the City Cauncil of the City of Anaheim that subJect
Petitlon for Reclasslflcation be approved and, by so doing, that Title 1A-Zoning of
the Anahelm Municipal Coda be amenAed to exclude the above-described property from
the RS-A-43,OQQ (RESIDENTIAL/AuRiCULTURAL) 20NE and to Incorporate sald descrihed
property into thc RM-1200 (RESIDENTtAL, MULTIPLE-PAHILY) ZONE upon the foltuwing
conditions which are hcreby found to be a necessary prerequisite to the pro~~osed use
of subJoct property in arder to preser:~e the safety and genera) welfare of the
Cltizen~ of the C(ty of Anahelm:
RESOLUTION N0. PC76-204
~ ~
1. That all engineering requirements of the City of A~aheim along Savanna
Street i~cluding preparatlon of improvement plans and instaliatlon of atl
improvements such as cur6s and gutters, sidewalks, street grading and paving,
dralnage facilitles or other appurtenant work, shall be complied with as requir~~d by
the City Englneer and in accordance with standard plans and spectfications on f~le in
the Office of the Ctty EngTneer; that street lightin9 facilitTes along Savanna Street
shall be installed as required by ~he Director of Public Utilities, and in accordance
w(th standard plarts and speclftcatlons on file in the Office of the Director of
Pubtic Utitittes; or that a bond~ certlflcate of deposit, letter of credlt. or cash,
in an amount and form satisfactory to the Clty of Anahcim shall be posted with the
City to guarantee the lnstallation of the above-mentloned requirements.
2, That the owncr(s) of aubJect property shell pny to the City of Anaheim
t;~e sum of stxty cenCS (b0~) per front goot along Ssvar~na Street foP Lree plantTng
purpo~as.
3. Thet traeh ~torage areas sha11 be provPded in accordance with approved
plans on file with the O}fice of the Director of Public Works.
4. That flre hydrant~ sheil be Installed and charged as requlred and
dotermined to be neceseery by the CMlef of the Fire Department prlor to commencement
of structural framing.
5. That subJect property shall hn served by underground utilltles.
6. Thst dralnage of subJect property shall be disposed of in a manncr
satisfactory to the City Engineer~ and thnt grading plans ~s approved by the City
Engineer, showing dralnage of the total site to the Carbon Crcek Channel (excepting
the front 15 foot setback ad)ecent to Savanne Street) shatl be submltted to the
Planning Commisslon for revlew prior to the Issuanee of a bullding permit.
7. 7hat the owner of subJect property shall pay to the City of Anahalm the
approprtete park and recreation fees as determined to be epproprimte by thc City
Council~ seld fees to be patd at the time the butlding permit ts issued,
8. Prlor to the introductlon of an ordinance rezoning subJact property~
Condition Nos. 1 and 2, above-mentloned, shall be completed, The provistons or
rights granted by this resolution ehall become null and void by action of the CTty
Council unlesa said conditions ere compllad with withtn one year frcxn the date
hereof, or eueh further tlme es the Clty Councll may grant.
9. That Conditton Nos. 3 and 5~ above-mentloned, shall be canplled with
prlor to flnal building and zoning inspectlons.
THE FOREGOING flE50LUTI0N is s'~ned
October 1976.
ATTE
SE AR ~ AN~EIM Ci7Y'PLANNING COMMISSION
STATE OF CALiFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE )ee.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
1, Patricia B. Scanian, Secretary of the Anahelm City Planning Commission,
do hereby certify that Che foregoing resolutlon was passed and edopted at a meeting
of thn Anahelm City Planning Commission, hcld on October 27~ t976~ at 1:30 p.m,~ by
tha followtng vote of the members thereof:
AYE~: COMMISSi0NER5: BARNES, HERBST~ KING, MORLEY, TOLAR, JOHNSON
NOES: COMMISSIONERSs FARANO
ABSENTs COMMISSIONERS: NONE
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 27th day of Octobnr
1976.
a~~ ~ ~~~~
, M 1 OMM SSION
-2- RESOLUTIOk k0. PC76-204