PC 76-22~ ~
RESQLUTIO~~ f~0. FC76-22
A RESOLUTIOtJ OF THE CITY PLAIVNIIIG COt~119ISSI014 Of THE CITY OF AIIAHEIt•t
TIIAT PETITIO(4 fOR VARIAPJCE N0. 2774 BE GRAMTED.
WHEREAS, the City Planning Cormnission of 'cn~ Git,y of Anaheim did. receive a
veri fi ed Peti ti on for Vari ance from TI~E 4lARP1IPdGT01•! COP1PANY, 17~t80 Sky Park Ci rcl e,
Suite 203, Irvine, California 92714 (O~~~ner) of certain s°eai Praperty situated jn the
City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of G~iifnrnia, d~seribe~.a, cs:
LOT 1 Or' TRACT PIO. 8992 If~! THE CITY OF ANAIiEIM, COUtliY ~; Ja1:NGt. ::~~AiE OF
CALIFORNIA, AS PER I•tAP RECORDEC IW BOOK 363 PAGE5 3~4 AtlU 35 OF MISCELLANEOUS
~~1APS, IP! THE OFFICE OF 711E COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COU':TY.
l~1HEREAS, the City Plannin9 Commission did hold a public hearing~at th~ GitS~
}iall in the City of Analieim on February 2, 1976, at 1:30 o.m., notice of said public
hearing having been duly given as required by l~w and in accordance t~~ith tl~e
provisions of the Anaheim htunicipal Code, Chapter 18.03, to hear and cons~der
evidence for and against said proposed variance and to investiaate and make findings
and recomrnendations in connection therewith; and
l~!lIEREAS, said Commiss~ion, after due inspection, investigation and study made
by itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all evidence and reoorts
offered at said hearing, does find and determine the following facts:
1. That the petitioner requests the follo~oing waivers from the Anaheim
14unicipal Code, to permit two (2) on-site tract signs:
a. SECTION 13.05.072.010 -(~iaximum number of tract si ns.
1 nermitted; 2 pro~osed
b. SECTIOi~ 18.05.072.022 - I4aximum sign area. (9G square feet
permitted; 180 square feet prooosed)
c. SECTIOW I8.05.072.0231 - 1laxirnum siqn hei ht. (14 feet oermitted;
16 feet oroposed
2, That the above-mentioned waivers are hereby granted for a time
limitation of six (6) months, on the basis that the proposed signing consists of tvio
single-faced tract signs and is for temporary advertisting for a net•~ly established
condominium development, as stipulated to by the petitioner.
3. That the petitioner stipu1ated to the immedia~e removal of any banners
or flags bein~ flown at the subject location advertising the subject development.
4. That there are exceptional or extraordinar,v circumstances or conditions
applicable to the property involved or to the intended use, as qranted, of the
property that do not apply ge~erally to the property or class of use in the same
vicinity and zone.
5. That the requested variance, as granted, is necessary fcr the
preservation and enjoyment of a siabstantial pro~erty right possessed by other
property in the same vicinity and zone, and denied to the nroperty i~~ question.
6. That the requested variance, as granted~ 411~~ not be mater~ally
detrimental to the public ~~+elfare or injurious to the property or improvements in
such vicinity and zone in whic!~ the property is located.
7. That no one indicated their presence at said public hearin9 in
opposition; and no correspondence was received in opposition to subject petition.
E~•1VIRONt4EP~TAL IIIPACT REPORT FIiJDING:
That the Director of the Planning Department has determined that the
proposed activity falls within the definit9on of Section 3.01, Class 11, of the City
of Anaheim Guid~ltnes to the Requirements for an Environmental Impact Report and is,
therefore, categorically exempt r'rom the requirement to file an EIR.
RESOLUTIOtd t~0. PC76-7.2
A.
~JOW, TflEREFGRE, DE Ii RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning Commissinn
does her~4ry grant sub~ect Petition for Variance, upon the follo~ring conditions ~~~hich
are her~~y foun~~ 'to be a necessary prerequisite to the prooosed use of the subiect
propert;,~ im order to preserve the safety and general tiaelfare of the Citizens of the
City ai ~naheim:
1. That any banners or flags advErtising the subject development and
currently beiry flo~~rn at the sub~ect location, shail he rernoved immediately, as
st~pulat~d~z by the petitioner.
'L. Thr;~ this variance is granted for a time limitati~n of six (6) months,
subject t~ revie~rr and consideration for an extension of time by the Planning
Gommissio~s upr.r~tvritten request by the petitianer.
?, That su5ject property shall be developed substantially in accorciance
wit~y r'~^fas and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim marked Exhibit hlo. 1.
'~,fa; FOREGQT;a:; :.~•::;`!LJTIOP~ is sianed and approved by me this ?nd day of
Feb~~~aary, ;.'~':~~.
CHAIRt•1AP~~ TEt4PORE
AWAHEI'1 CITY PLANNING COI•1h? SSIO!!
ATTEST:
Afi~'LGC.LAC/
~ ~ H . ~~tl ~~a •• S t•I
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUP~TY OF ORANGE )ss.
CITY OF Af~ANEIPI )
I, Patricia 6. Scanlan, Secretary of the City Planning Comm.ission of the
City of Anaheim, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution ~•~as ~assed and
adopted at a meeting of the City Plannin9 Commission of the City of Anaheim, held on
Feb~uary 2, 1976, at 1:30 p.m., by the follotaing vote of the members thereof:
AYES: COMhiISSiOPlERS: HERBST, JONNSO~J, KING, TOLAR, MORLEY
P~OES: C0141•1ISSIOWERS: IJONE
ADSE(JT: COt4MISSI0IJERS: QAR~IES, FARANO
1976.
IP~ IJITNESS 4111[REOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 2nd day of February,
~~~~~ ~~~
SECRE R, PlANEIi1 CITY fJNI~~G CO"1'• ISSION
_p_ RESOLUTIOfJ N0. PC7'~-?.7.