PC 76-251~ ' ~
RESOLUTION ~J~. PC76-251
A RESQLUTION Of THE ANAHEIM CITY PLANNIt7G C011MISSION
RECGHHENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CiTY OF AMAHEfM
THAT PETITION FOR RECLASSIFICATION N0. 76-77-7 BE APPROVED
WHEREl1S, the llnahelm City Planning Commisslon did receive a verifled Petition f~r
Reclassificatlon from JANE W. INCH, 9Q8 West Bay Avenue; P7etvport Reach, California q2~60
(Owner) and DALE L. I~f,RAM, P. 0. Box 59Z2~ El Monte, Callfornla 9173~r (1lgent) of certaln
real property situated in the City of Anahelm, County of Orange, State of Califor•nia,
descrlbed as:
T11E SOUTHWES' QUARTER OF 'fHE SOUTF9WEST QUARTER OF THE PJORTHFAST QUARTER QF SELTION 27,
TO~JNSHIP 4 SOUTH, RANGE 10 WEST, IN THE RANCHO SAN JUAN CAJQN DE SANTA ANA, CITY OF
ANAHEIM, COUPITY QF ORAN~f., STATE 6F CALIFORNIA, AS PER MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 51 PAf;E 1(1
OF t11SCELLAtJEOUS.MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE CoU~ITY RECnRDFR OF SAID COUNTV, LYIN~
EASTERLY OF THE EASTERLY ~.INE AtID THE NORTHERLY ANt1 SOUTHERLY PROLQM~ATION T.HEREOF, OF
TNE LAP~D DE5CP,IBED IN A LEASE TO Tfit BANK OF A~1Ef~ICA, NATIONAL TRUST AND SAVINf.,S
ASSO~IATION RECORDED IN BOOk 6226 PAGE II06, OFFICIAL RECOR(1S. '
EXf.EPT ANY PORTION TNEREOF LYIN~ WIIHIM THE LAND COMFIRMFD TO JOHN VINCF.NT THOMPSON,
ET UX., BY JUD~MENT RF~JDERED UNDFR CASE N0, h1~5A AND ~10. 40Q1~ ,IN THF SUPF.RIOR f611RT
OF THE STATF dF CALIFORNIA A r,OPY OF WHICH WAS RECQRDED SFPTEMHFR i, 14~{3 tN BOOY, 1208
PAGE 28] OF QFFICIAL RECORDS.
WHERFAS, the City Planning Commisslon did schedule a public hearinq at the City
Hall in the City of A~aheim on August 7, 1976, at.1.:3Q P•m., natice of sa.id public hearln9
having been duly given as required by law and in accordance wtth the provislons of the
Anaheim Municipal Code, Chapter 18.03, to hear and consider evidence for and against said
proposed reclassification and to .ir.~iestigate and make findings and recommendations in
connectlon therewith; sald puhlic hearinp having been continued to the Planning Commission
meeting nf December 6. 1976; and
WHEREAS, said Commission, after due inspection, investiqation and stucly made by
itself and in its behalf, and aftc: riue consideratlon of all evidence and reports affered
at said hearing, does find and deCermin~ the 4ollowing f,sc2sr.
1. That the petitioner proposes a rPClassificatlon of zoning on lhe ahove-
descrtbed property from the RS-A-43.~~~`~ (RESIDEWT~:;~/AGRICULTURIIL). 70NE to the RM-12r1Q
(RESIDENTIAL, MULTIPLE-FAPiiLY) 70NE. ~
2. That the Anaheim General Pian, as amended, designates the sub}ect property
far medlum denslty residential land uses.
3, That tlie proposed reci~ssification of subJect property Is necessary and/or
Jesirzble fo'r the orderly and prnper development of the community.
4. That the~ proposed reclasslfication of subJect ~roperty dces prop~rly relate
to the zones and the(r permitted u~es'generally established throughout the communlty.
5, That the proposed reclassificatton of suhJect property requirr.s the
dedication and improvement of abutting streets in accordance a~ith thr. Circulation EleMent
of the Generai Plan, due to the anticipaYed increase in trafftc which a+ill be generated by
the ',ntensification of land use.
~i. That no one indlcated'tlieir presence at satd public hearing ln oppositton;
and that no correspondence was recei~ed in opposition to subJect petltion.
E~~VIRQf~MENTAL IHPAf.T REPORT FI~JDI~~: That the Anaheim City Planning Ccmmission dc~es
hereby recommend to the City Councll of the City of Anaheim that a negative declarati~n
from the requlrements to prepare an e~vironmental tmpact report he ~pnroved fo~ the
subJect proJect, pursuant to the provisions of the California Environmantal 2uality R:ct.
Pl04l, THEREFdRE, BE IT RESQIVED that the Anaheim City Planning Commission dc~s
hereby recommend to the City Council of the City of Anaheim that subJect Petitfon for
RESOLUTION N0. PC76-251
~ ' • ~
Reclassification be approved and, hy so doing, that Title 18-7.oning of the Anaheim
Municipal Code be amended to exclude the above-described prnper[y from the RS-A-~13,~~0
~RESIDF.NTIAL/AfRlCULTURAL} 70PIE and to incnrporate said descrihed property lnto the RM-
1200 (RESIDENTIAL, MULTIPLE-FAMILY) ZOtJE upon the follnwing conditions ~ahich are herehy
found to be a necessary prerequisite to the proposed use of suhJect property in order to
preserve the safety and general oielfare of the C.itizens of the City of Anaheim:
1, That, the oamer(s) of sub.ject p~operty shall deed to the Ctty of Anaheim e
strip of land 45'feet fn width from the centerline of the street along Orangeo,ood Ave;,ue
for street wtdening purposes. .
2, That, all engineerin9 requirements of the City of Anaheim zlong Orangewnod
Avenue, including preparation or improvement plans and ~nstallation of ali i~provements
such as curbs and gutters, sidewalks, street grading and paving, draina,e facilities, or
other appurtenant work, siiall be compited a~ith as requlred by the ,City Engineer and in
accordanca with standard plans and specifications on file i~ tt;e office of the City
Engineer; that street lighting facilitles along Orange~oood Avenue shill be installed as
required by the Director of Public Utilities and in accordance ~utth standard plans and
specifications on file in the office of the Director of Public Utilitfes; and/or that a
bond, certificate of deposit, letter .of credit, or cash, in an amount and form
satisfac;ory to the City of Anaheim, shall be posted with the City to guarantee the
installation of the above-mentloned requtrements.
3. That tl~e owner(s) of suh.~ect property shall pay t~ the City of Anaheim the
sum of 6Q cents per front foot along Orangewood Avenue for Cree planting purposes.
4. That trash storaae areas shall be provided in accordance with approved plans
on file with the office~of tMe Direceor of Publtc Works.
5. That fire hydrants shall be installed and charged as required and determined
to be necessary by the Chief of the Fire Department prior to commencement of structural
framing.
6. That subject property shall be served by underground utilitles.
7. That drainage of subJect property shal) be disposed of ln a manner
satisfactory ta the City Engineer.
a. That the owner(s} of suhJect Qroperty shall pay to the City of Anaheim the
appropriate park and r~creation in-lieu fees as determined t~ be appronriate by Yhe City
Council, said fees to be paid at the time the huilding permit is issued.
9, That appropriate watr_r assessment fees, as determinrd bv the Director of
Public Ut)litles, shall he paid to the Ctty of Anahelm prlor to the issuance of a building
permit.
Prior to the introduction of an ordinance rezoning s~n3ect property,
Condition Plos. 1, 2 and 3, above-mentioned, shall be completed. The provislons or rlghts
granted by this resolution shall become null and void by action of the City Council unless
sald condltions are complied with within one year from the date here~f, or such further
time as the City Council may granC.
11. That Condition Nos. 4, h, 7 and 10, above-mentloned, shall be complled ~aith
prlor to final building and zontng inspections,
TIiE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is signed
December, 1976.
ATTEST:
C~~«.J ~ ~a~..~u..~
SECRETARY, APll1HEIM CITY PLANNING CQMMI55!ON
and app~r d b me thts hth ~ay of
~
CHA I Pc AN At~A M C I TY P LA~lP! 1 NG CONM I 55 I ON
_2., RESOLUTION No. PC7b-251
.
~ ' ' ~
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANr,E )ss.,
CITY 9F AWANEIM )
;, Patricla t3. Scanlan, Secretary of the Hnahelm City Planning Commission. do
hereby certify that the foregoing resolutlon was passed and adopted at a meetin9 of the
Anaheim City Planni~g Commission, held on December 6, 1~7fi, at 1:3~~ ~.m., by the following
vote of the members tfiereof:
AYFS: COMMISStOPlERS: RARPlES, fARA~10, HERBST, KfNG, MORLEY, TOLAR, JOHNSQN
MOES: COMMISSIOt~ERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
197~
IM WITNESS ti'NEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 6th day of December
. p~C'GG+-•-~r~
ECRETAR , A AIiEIM CIT PLANNINR COMMISSION
_3~ RESOLUTION N0. PC7Fi-25~