PC 76-46~ ~
R[SOLUTION N0. PC76-46
F1 RESOLUTION OF Tl1E CITY PLA~IPlIP~G COMPIISSIOtd OF 'fllE CITY Of AtlAIIEIH
THAT PE:ITIOt; FOR VARIAtICE tJO. 27$5 13E GRAtITED.
WHEREAS, the City Planning Cor.miss~on ofi the Ci+yo uf Maheim did receive a
verifieri Petition for Variance from JOHN F. SEYPIOUR, JR., 120a S. Euclid Avenue,
Anaheim, California 92301 (ONmer); G. J. GROSSO, 1205 S. Euclid Euclid Avenue,
Anaheim, Califorria 92301 (Agent) of certain real nroperty situated in the City ~f
Anaheim, County of Orange, 5tate of California described as:
Lot 63 of Tract No. 2711, in the City of Anaheim, County of Oranae, State of
California, as per map recorded in Qook a5, Pa4zs 24 to 2G inclusive,
t•1~scellaneous t4aps. in the office of the County Recorder of said County.
4Jl1EREAS, the City Planning Commission did hold a oublic hearing at the City
liall in the City of Anaheim on t•larch ?5, 1976, at 1:30 p.m., notice of said oublic
hearing having been duly given as required by law and in accordance with the
provisions of the Anaheim ~4unicipal Code, Chapter 1^.03, to hear and consider
evidence for and against said proaosed variance and to investigate and make findinns
and recommendations in connection therewith; and
WHEREAS, said Commission, after due insoection, investiqation and study made
by itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all evidence and reoorts
offered at said hearing, does find and determine the following facts:
1. That the petitioner requests the foZlo~aing waiver from the Anaheim
ilunicipal Code, to permit an unlawfully canstructed room addition.
SECTION 18.26.063.020 - Minimum side ard setback. (5 feet
require ; 3 eet ex st ng)
2. Tha•t the above-mentioned waiver is hereb,y granted on the basis that the
necitioner indicated that the pronerty had chan,ryed ownership at least two times since
the subject room addition was constructed and, therefore, denial of said waiver a~ould
create a hardship f~r the petitioner.
3. That there are exceptional or extraordinary circumstance ur canditions
applicable to the property involved or to the intended use of the pro~ert,y that do
not apoly generally to the property or class of use in the same vicinity and zone.
4. That ttie requested variance is necessary far the preservation and
enjeyment of a substantial praperty right possessed by other pronerty in the same
vicinity and zone, and denied to the prooerty in question.
5. That the requested variance ~aill not be materially detrimental to the
~ublic welfare or injurious to the property or improwements in such vicinity and zone
in which the oroperty 9s located.
6. That no one indicated their nresence at said oublic hearinn in
opposition; and no correspoqdence was received in o~position to subject ~eti~ion.
ENVIkOYMEPI7AL IMPAC7 R[PORT FINDING:
That the Director of the Plar~ing Department nas deterroined that the
proposed activity falls within the definition of Section 3.01, C1ass 1 of the Citv
of Anaheim Guidelines to the Requirements for an Enviroii~r!ental Imoact RE~port and is,
therefore, categorically exempt from th2'requirement to file an EIR.
NOId, THEREFORE, QE IT RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planninn Commission
does he~•eby grant sub~ect Petition for Variance, unon the following conditions which
are hereby found to be a necessary prerequisite to the proposed use of the subject
prooerty in order to preserve the safety and neneral welfare of the Citizens of the
City of Anaheim:
1. P7ans shall be submitted to the Building Division showinq comnliance
v~ith the minimum standards of the City of Anaheim, inclu~±inq the Uniform Buildinn,
Plumbing, Electrical, Housing, Flechantcal and Fire Codes as adopted by the City of
Anaheim. The appropr•iate oermits shall be obtained fnr ariy necessary ~rork.
RESOLUTIOPI t10. PC76-46
2. That sub~~ property shall be developed s~ubstantiallv in accordance
with plans and specifications on file with the C9ty of Anaheim marked Exhibit No. 1.
T11E FOREGOING RESQLUTION is signed and approvEd by me this 15th da,y of
March, 1976.
_ :~i~~
I~ IA~ .. ., ~ I
ATTEST
~ ~ ~~~J
SECRET RY, ANAI1EIh1 CI Y PL!~NNING C01•114ISSIOfd
STAT[ OF CALIFOR(JIA )
COUPJTY OF ORANGE )ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIP1 )
I, Patricia B. Scanlan, Secretary of the City Planning Commission of the
City of Anaheim, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolut9on was passed and
adouted at a meeting of the City Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim, held on
(•tarch 15, 1976, at 1:30 p.m., by the follow9ng vote of the members thereof:
AYES: C0~1'1ISSIOt1ERS: DARNES, iIER~STT JONPdSON, Y.ING, MORLEY, FARANO
NOES: COf~1t1ISSI0NERS: i~OP~E
ABSE~dT: COP•1t•tISSIONERS: TOLAR
1976.
ItJ WITNESS IJHEREOF, I.have hereunto set my hand this 15th day of Mlarch,
~~~~~ ~~~
S~ E R, N H I 1 Z`I'~~C7 N I~N C0~~1~1IS~ SI~N
_Z_ RESOLUTIOt~ N0. PC76-46