PC 76-61~ ~
RESOLUT.ION N0. PC76-61
A RESOLUTION OF 7tiE CITY ?LANPIING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
RECOMMENDING TO TfiE CITY COUtJCIL OF THE CITY Of ANAHEIM THAT PCTITION
FOR RECLASSI~ICATION N0. 75-76-27 BE APPROVED FOR RS-72Q0 ZOHING
WliEREAS, the City Plannin9 Commisslo~ of the Lity of Anaheim did receive a
verified Petition for Reclassification from CRUZ VARGAS, 1839 S, Mountain View
Avenue, Anaheim, Califcrnia 92802 (Owner} of certain real preperty situated in the
Lity of Anaheim, County of Orange. State of California described as:
That portion of Lot No. 8 of Townsend's Subdiviston in the City of Anahetm,
County of Orange, State of California, as per map recorded in Boak 5, Pagc 40 of
Miscellaneous Haps, in the affice of the Ce!inty Recorder of said County, lying
southerly of Traet No. 6792 as recorded in Book 277, Pages i9 and 20 of said
Miscellaneous Maps and lying northerly of Tract No. 4731 as recorded in Book 17A,
Pages 5 and 6 of said Miscellaneous Maps, and more particularly described as
follows:
Beginning at the southwest corner of said Tract No. (i792; thence alon9 the
southerly line of said Tract. North 89° 12' 43" East, 2E7.38 feet to the
southeast corner of Lot 15 in said Tract No. 6792; thence along the southerly
prolongation of the easterly line of said Lot 15, Snuth 00° 55' 10" East, 210.78
feet to a point on the northerly line of previously mentioned Tract No. 4731;
thence along said northerly line, S~uth 99° 12' 20" West, 267.31~ feet to the
northwest corner of said Tract No. 4731; tlience Plorth 00° 55' 4A" West, 210.Ri
feet to the point of beginning.
Containing 1.294 Acres.
WHEREAS~ the City Planning Commission did schedule a public hearing at the
City 4a11 in the City of Anaheim on March 29, 1976~ at.1:3~ p.m., rotice of said
public hearing having been duly given as requtred by law and in accordance with the
provisions of the Anaheim Municipal Code, Chapter 18.03, to hear and consider
evidence for and against said proposed reclassification and to investigate and make
findings and recommendations in connection therewith; said public hearing havin9 been
contiiued to the Planning Commission meeting of April 12, 197G; and
WHEREAS, said Commission, after due inspection, investigation and study made
by itself and in tts behalf, and after due cansideration of all evtdence and reports
offered at said hearing, does find ar~d determine the foilowing facts:
1. That the petitioner propc~es.a reclassification of the above-described
property from the RS-A-43~000 (RESIDEtJTIAL/AGRICULTURAL) ZO~IE to the RS-5000
(RESIDENTIAL, SINGLE-FAMILY) ZONE.
2. That the Anaheim General Plan designates suhJect property for low-
density residenttal uses.
3. That the Anaheim City Planning Commtssion does herehy recomisend
approvat of reclassification of subJect property to the RS-72Q0 2one, on the basts
thst all the surrounding res3dential zoning is RS-72~0 and that the petttioner
stipulated to subdividing the property into six (6), RS-72Q0 lots, said lots to be
developed in accordance with all stte development standards of the RS-7200 Zone.
4. That the reclassification of subJect property, as granted, is necessary
and/or desirable for the orderly and proper development of the community.
5. That the reclassification of subJect property, as granted, does
properly relate to the zones and their permitted uses locally established in close
proximity to subject property and to the zones and their permltted uses generalty
established throughout the community.
6. That the reclassification of subJect property requires the dedlcatlon
and improvement of abutting streets in accordanca with the Circulation Element of the
General Plan~ due to the anticipated increase in traffic which wtll be generated by
the Intensification of land use.
7. That if any building is to erected on the Southern Calffornla
Edison Company (Sierra Electrlc Company) easement along the snut-+ h~undary of subJect
property, petitioner stipulated to obtaining a letter from said coc7pany approving such
construction, prior to issuance of a bu(lding permit.
RESOLUTlON N0. PC76-61
~ ~
8. 'Ihat five (5) persons appeared, representing approximately twenty (20)
persons present at sald public hearing in oppositton ta subJec: petitton for RS-5000
zoning; and a petltton in opposition, signed by approximately sixty-nine (69)
property owners in the immediate area was received.
ENVIR~NMENTAL 1~1PACT REPURT FINDING:
Ttiat the Anaheim City Planning Commission does hereby recommend to the City
Council that the subJect proJect be exempt from the requirement to prcpare an
environmental impact reporL, pursuant to the provisions of the Catifornla
Environmental Quality Act.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE iT R'cSOLVED that the Anahein City Plannina Lommission
does hereby recommend to the City Council of the City of Anaheim that subJect
Petitien for Reclassification be approved and, by so doing, that Titte 18-Zoning of
the Anaheim Municlpal Code be amended to exclude the above-described uroperty f~om
the RS-A-43,000 (RE517ENTIAL/AGRICULTURAL) ZONE and to incorporate said described
property into the RS-720~ (RESIDE!~TIAL, SIHGLE-FAMILY) ZOtlE upon the following
conditions which are hereby found to be a necessary prereauisite to the proposed use
of subJect property i~ order to preserve the safety and general welfdre of the
Citizens of the City of Anaheim.
1. That the ouner(s) of subJect property shall deed to the City of Anaheim
a strip of land 30 feet in width alon9 each side of the proJected tenterline of
4laverly Drive, for a total width af 60 feet, for street construction purooses.
2. That all engineering requirements of the City of Anaheim along Waverly
Drive, including preparation of improvement plans and installation of ali
improvements such as curbs and gutters, sidea~alks, street grading and paving~
draina9e facilities~ or other appurtenant work, shall he complied wlth as required by
the City Englneer and in acc~rdance with standard plans and specifications on file In
the Office of the City Engineer; that street lighting facilities along Waverly Drive
shall be installed as required by the Director of Public Utilities, and in accordance
with standard plans and specifications on file in the Offtce ~f the Director ef
Public Utilities; or that a bond in an amount and form satisfactory to the City of
Anaheim shall be posted with the City to ~uarantee the installation of the above-
mentioned requirements.
3. That fire hydrants shall be installed and charged as requlred and
determined to be necessary by the Chief of the Fire Department prior to commencement
of structural framing..
4. That drainage of subJect property shall be disposed of in a manner
satisfactory to the CiYy Engineer.
y. That the owner of subJect prooerty shall pay to the City of Anaheim the
appropriate park and recreation in-lieu fees as determined to be approprlate by the
City Council, said fees to be patd at the time ehe building permft is issued.
6. That a fi~al tract map of subJect property, indicating six (6) lots In
conformance with all RS-7200 Zone site development standards, shall be submitted to
and approved by the City Councii and then be recorded in the Office of the Orange
County Recorder.
7. That subJect property shall be developed substantlally in accordar.ce
with plans and speciflcations on file with the City of Anaheim marked Exhihit No. 1;
provided~ however, that there shall be a max~mum of six (6) lots, which shall be
to by ~phe petitioner~~c with the P.5-72Q0 Zone site development standards, as stipulated
8. Prior to the iniroductlon of an ordinance rezoning subJect property,
Condition Nos. 1, 2, and 6, ~bove-mentioiied, sha11 be completed. The provisions or
rights granted by this resolution shall become null and void by action of the City
Council unless said conditlons are complied with within one year from the date
hereof, or such further time as the City Council may 9rant.
? That Condition Nos. 4 and 7, above-mentioned, shall be compiled wtth
prior to final building and zoning inspections.
_2_ RE~OLUTION N0. PC76-61
~ ~ ~
10. That,tf any building is to be erected on the Southern California Edison
Company (Slerra Electrtc Cort~pany) easem~nt along the south boundary of subJect
prcperty, petitioner stipulated to obtaTning a letter from satd company~ approving
such construction. prlor to issuance of a butlding permit.
THE FOREGOING hE50LUTI0t~ Ts si~ned and approved by me this 17.th day of
April, 1976•
~~y
CHA RMAN~ ANAHEIM CITY PLANNIt~G COMMISSION
ATTEST:
~~~.~,~~~~
SECRETARY, ANpHEIM CITY PLANNING COHMISSIO~I
STATE OF LALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORAt~GE )ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I~ Patricia B. Scanlan, Secretary of the City Planning Commission of the
City of Anaheim~ do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and
adopted at a meeting of the City Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim, held on
April 12, 1976, at 1:30 p.m., by the followi~g vote of the members Yhereof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BAR~~ES, HERBST, JOHN50~~, KING, MORLEY, TOLAR, FARANO
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ADSEtJ7: COHMISSIONERS: NOqE
IN WITNE55 HHEREflF, I have hereunto set my hand this 12th day of April, 1976•
~~z~~ ~.~~
SECRETARY, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMNISSION
_3_ RESOLUTION N0. Pt76-61