PC 76-91~ ~
RESOLUTION PJO. PC76-91
A RESOLIITIUN OF TI1E ANAl1EIM CITY PLAPINING C011MISSION
T'HAT PETITIOIJ FOR COtlDITIONAL USE PERMIT N0. 1618 BE GRAt~TED.
WHEREAS, the Anaheim City Planning Commisslon did receive a verified
Petition for Conditional Use Permit from LEONARD MASSEtlA, 562 S. Dune, Anaheim,
California 92805 (Owner); MARY M. DOVE, 5~24 Arbor Road, Long Beach, California 9~p~II
(A9ent) of certain real property situated in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange,
State of California described as:
Lot 121 of Tract No. 2205, city of Anaheia, as shown on a map thereof recorded in
bo~k 64, pages 33, 34 and 35, Miscelianeous Maps, records of said Orange County.
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at the City
fiall in the City of Anaheim on May 1~, 1976, at 1:30 p.m., notice of said public
hearin9 having been duly 9iven as required by law and in accordance with the
provisions of the Anaheim Municipal Code, Chapter 1P.Q3, to hear and consider
evidence for and against said proposed conditional use and to investigate and make
findings and recommendations in connection therewith; and
WHEREAS, said Commission, after due inspection, investigation and study made
by itself and in its behaif, and after due consideration of all evidence and reports
offered at said hearing, does find and determine the following facts:
1. That the proposed use is properly one for which a conditional use
permit is authorized by Code Section 18.26.050.02Q, to wit: permiC a day nursQry in
an existin9 residence in the RS-72Q0 (RESIDENTIAL~ 51NGLE-FAMILY) ZONE.
2. 7hat the petitioner stipulated that a maximum of twenty-four (24)
children will be cared for on the subJect property at any one time and the facilities
will be provided in accordance with the State of California requirements pertaining
to square footage per child.
3. That the petitioner stipulated that the hours of operation will he from
6:30 a.m. to 6:00 p.m.
4, That the conJunctive residential use of the property is granted for a
manager/caretaker.
5. That the Planning Com~~:ission d~es hereby determine that the subJect use
shall be granted for a time liiaitation of three (3) years, subJect to review and
possible extensions of time, said time limitation intended to determine whether the
proposal has had an adverse effect on the surrounding residential neighborhood with
respect to noise, parking, traffic, etc.
6. That the Planning Comnissian does further determine that fencing of the
front yard of subJect property adJacent to State College Boulevard shail not exceed
four (4) feet tn height, as stipulated to by the petitioner.
7, That the Planning.fommission does further determine that an eight (8)
square foot sign wouid provide appropriate advertising of subJect conditional use
and, therefore, grants said sign area.
8. That the proposed use will not adversely affect the adJoining land uses
and the 9rowth and development of the area in which it is proposed to be located,
9. That the size and shape of the site proposed for the use is aAequate to
allow the full development of the proposed use in a manr.er not detrimental to the
particular area nor to the peace, health, safety~ and general welfare of the Citizens
of the City of Anaheim.
1Q. That the granting of the Conditional Use Permit under the conditions
imposed, if any, will not be detrtmental to the peace, health, safety and 9eneral
welfare of the Citizens of the City of Anaheim.
11, That r.n one indicated their presence at said public heari~g in
opposition; and no correspondence was received in opposition [o subJect petttion.
RESOLUTION N0. PC76-91
~ ~
EPJVIRONMEN7AL IMPACT REPORT FIPlDING:
That the Anaheim City Planning Commission does hereby recommend to the City
Council that the subject project be exampt from the requirement to prepare an
environmental impact report, pursuant to the provisions of the California
Environmental Quality Act.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Anaheim Ctty Planning Commission
does hereby grant subJect Petition for Conditionat Use Permit. upon the following
conditions which are hereby found to be a necessary prerequisite to the proposed use
of the subJect property in order to preserve the safety and general welfare o€ the
Citizens of the City of Anaheim:
1. That in accordance with the requirements cf the Director of Public
Works, the owner(s) of subject property shall either (a) install street li9hting
facilities along State Coliege Boulevard as required by the Director of Public
Utilities and in accordance with sta~dard plans and specificattons on fitie in the
Office of the Director of Public Utilities and that a bond in an amount and form
satisfactory to the City of Anaheim shall be posted with the City to guarantee the
installation of the above-mentioned requirement; or (b) shalt pay to the City of
Anaheim the sum of two dollars ($2.00) per front foot along State Coliegc Boulevard
for street lighting purposes.
2. That ths existing structure shall be brought up to the minimum
standards of the City of Anaheim, including the Uniform Building, Plumbing,
Electrical, Housing, Mechanical and Fire Codes, as adopted by the City of Anaheim.
3. 7hat the owner(s) of subJect property shall deed to the City of Anaheim
a strip of land fifty-three (53) feet in width from the centerline of the street
along State College eoulevard for street-widening purposes.
4. That subJect property shall be developed substantially in accordance
with plans and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim marked Exhibit No. 1;
provided~ however~ that fencing along the State College Boulevard frontage shall not
exceed four (4) feet in height, as stipulated to by the petitioner.
5. That Conditicn hos. 1 and 3, ahove-mentioned, shall be complied with
prior to commencement of the activity authorized under this resolution, or prior to
the time that the building permit is issued, or within a period of one (1) yaar from
date hereof, whichever occurs first, or such further time as the Planning Commission
and/or City Council may grant.
6. That Condition Nos. 2 and 4, above-mentioned, shall be complied with
prior to final building and zonin9 tnspectlons.
7. That in order to determine whether any adverse effects will result from
tlie granting of the proposed use, the Planning Commission grants said use for a
period of three (3) years, after which time, and upon written request by the
petitioner, consideration may be given as to ~ahether the use should be extended.
8. That this conditional use permit is granted for a maximum of twenty-
four (24) children to be cared for at any one time on the subJect property; pr'ovided,
however, that the facilities shall be provided in accordance with the State of
Californla requirements pertaining to square footage per child, as stipulated to by
the petitioner.
9, That the hours of operation shall be from 6:30 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., as
stipulated to by the petitioner.
10. That the residential use of the subJect property shall he for a
mana9erlcaretaker only.
il, That the signing for the proposed use ts granted not to exceed eight
(S) square feet in area, as stipulated to by the petttioner.
_2~ RE50LUTION N0. PC75-9S
. ~ • ~
THE FOREGOING RESQLUTIOt~ 15 signed and approved by me this lOth day of
May. 1976.
~ .
,
CH MAPJ PRO PORE
ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING CQMMISSION
ATTEST:
~ l~ Ci ~ Jj~~l,li.t~%fliX~
SECRETARY, APIAHEIM CIiY PLANPIlNG COMMISS~ON
STATE OF CRL{FORNIA )
LOUtITY OF ORAN6E ) ss.
CITY OF At1AHE1M )
I,• Patricia B. Scanlan, Secretary of the City Planning Commission of the
City of Anaheim, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and
adopted at a meeting of the City Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim, held on
May 10, 1976, at 1:3~ p.m., by the following vote of the members thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS:• BARNES, JOHNSON, KING, MORLEY, TQLAR, HERBST
NOES: COMMISSIOhERS: NON~
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: FARANO
I IN WITNESS W!a~REOF, I have hereunto set my hand this lOth day of May~ 147E•
O~~ccc-a~i~'' ~C~~CL.2.~
SECRE AR , A~~AHEIM CI Y LANN trG COMMISSION
_3_ RESOLUTION N0. PC76-91