PC 77-11WHEREAS, ttv! Anaheim City Planning Commissi n did recAv a verified
P Ion for Variance from JOSEPH P. AND GLADYS E, GLEASON, 3400 W. Ball R ad,
An h im, California 92804 (OwnPrs); ARCHITECTURE WEST, INC„ 747 W. Katella ftvw e,
#1 2 Orlfmg Calif rnia 92667 (Agent) of certain real property situated in the City
f An h Im, County f trange, Su If California described as:
e
THAT PORTIIN OF THE EAST ONE-HALF OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 23,
TOWSHIP 4 SOUTH, AANGE 11 WEST, S&M MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS
FtLLIP,S:
BEG kING AT A POINT IN THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP 4 SOUTH,
WEST, WHICH IS DISTANT EASTERLY, MEASURED ALONG SAID NORTH LINE, 663,12
FELg FoOM THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTI N 23, AND RUNNING THENCE F OM SAII0
PONT OF *GINNING, EASTERLY, ALONG S ID NORTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 23, 238,10
FEET TO A L'OINT; THENCE SOUTHERLY, PARALLEL WITH THE WEST LINE SF THE EAST ONE-
HALF OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION, 864.75
FEET TO A POINT I N THE NORTHEASTERLY LINE OF THE RIGHT OF W Y OF THE PACIFIC
ELECT*IC RhIL Y; THENCE H RTHWESTERLY, ALONG SAID NORTHEASTERLY RIGHT OF WAY
LINE 29735 FEET TO A POINT IN THE WEST LftE OF SAID EAST ONE-H LF OF THE
NO TIEST QUARTER 1! THE NO"TWEST QUA OF SAID SECTION 23, THENCE NORTHERLY
L NG S ID WEST L1 NE 685€75 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING,
TH
EXCE TING THE NORTHE
A
RESOLUTION OF THE ANAHEUI CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
T PETITION FOR VA
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did schedule
City Hall In the City sf /14heim on December 6, 1976, at 1:30 p
lic hearing h ving been duly given as rAquired by law and i
rot/hi° s •f th Ahe1m Municipal C de, Ch
itence for and ag inst said , r*p sed variant
nd reco2filendttitro in connection therewith;
co tin Ald t the P1Pnning ComrrissIon - eting of J
WHEREAS said C
by Itself and in its behalf,
offered at sed h .r1 g, d e
That the p titi
naholm Municipal Code, to c
RES0LUTJ0N N0 . PC77-11
CE NO® 2881 BE GRWED, IN
sion, after du inspecti
and en ter due c*nsider ti
find and deg mine the f
LY 258 FEET OF THE WESTERLY U FEET,
n
public h a ing at the
n tice of said
accordance with the
h ar and consider
ke findings
rg been
t•
pter fl L03 to
and t. investiga and m
id public hearing h
nary 17, 1977; n d
n in estigatio a
n •f all evidence
flowIrg facts:
b, ggIETLILIL2!ELQaa
ner proposes the f 1 owing waiv rs from the
nstruct a 60-uOt apartment comp1ex:
a. (70 fqAt
r quir d; 52!t proposed)
c® ig_LIEL211L.1101,91,9 alg 11 red nc ofcartrts.
d study made
nd r ports
ES LUT1ON NO® PC77-11
c
3
Ise
wEt
(Pi
2. That Waiver 1-a, above-mentioned, is hereby Granted on the b is
that any development of the pr perty would require a minimal lot width along the
street because of existing .djacent development; that the minimum lot width area
c sists of a driv entrance and does not include any buildings; and that th
p tition r de onstra:ed that a hardship would be created if s.id waiver were not
granted.
3 That the petitioner stipulated to providing an 8-foot high wall
with trees planted 20 feet on centers to buffer the pr posed residences fro
the h spital to the east.
4. That Waivers 1-b anl above-mentioned, have been deletedby
revised plans and are no longer requested.
5. That there are exceptional or extraordina circumstances or
c nditio applicable to the property involved or to the Untended use of the
p perty that do not apply generally to the property or class of use in the
sarne icinity and zone,
s
enj
vic
7. That th requested variance will not be materially detrimental
the public wolf re or injurious to the property •r improvements in such vicinity
and zone in which the property is located.
8 That three (3) persons appeared, repr senting approximateiy seven
(7) p sons present at said pubnc hearing in opposition; and that a petition
signed by a proximately eighty-three (83) persons in opposition was rec ived at
s id public haring.
5
5
•
si
negitiv
ppr
ror
6. That the requested variance is necessary for the preservation and
y nt of a substantial roperty right ossessed by other property in the sam
nity and zone, and denied to the property in quostion.
0
ENV0R0NME TAL 0 MP CT REPORT F1NDINGg That the Anahehu City Planning
_....
f the City of AnmKgAm that a
declaration 'r. the requirement to prepare an environmental i pact report
d for the subject pro ect, pursuant to the provisions of the California
nt 1 Quality Act,
NOW THEREF •RE, BE iT RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning Commissi n
d_ys herby grant In part subject PtfttIon f r Vari nee, up n the f 11 ing
comd I* s which are hereby f und to be a n cessary pr req kite t* the pr p d use
f the subject property in order to preserve the safety and ge nera l welfsre •f the
Citiz4ns of the City of Au hem
im:
fey
1® That this Variance is granted subjact to the co
i'lettion N . 767727 nin pending.
the c , 7cnc
time that t
herantf , whichtv
d/or City Coun
2, That subject pr party shall be developed substanti lly in acc rdance.
ns and acfcatrs on ffle with the City of Anahehl corked Exhnflt Nos. 1
n
No 1), 2 nd
3® That , Condition No® 1, abovt rnentIonad , shall be
ant of tho &c t?vty authorized under this resoluti
he building permit is Issued, or withi n a period
c urs first, such further dm f'' as the
il my grant
•
rn
pled
mpiied with prior to
n, or prior to the
f one year from d
Planning Commiss
-2-
RES0LUTJIN NO. PC77-11
SECRTAV, AA W1
Ci
STATE
COUNTY a OANGE
CiTY F ANAHEi
th
TTESTs
AVES:
OES
SE
BST
1977®
T
IN:
COMMiSS0ONERS:
COMMiSSiONERS2
COMPUSSIONERS:
COMMiSSi HERS:
4 That Codth n No 2 above-mentiond shall be comp
f building cid zoning inspections.
THE FOREGONG RESOLUTiON is sgned 1 d pprve.i by me this 17th d y
n a y, 19x`7®
i, Patricia B. Scanian Secretary o the Anaheim City Planning Commission,
her by certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting
the naheim City Planning Co held •n January 17, 1977, at '1230 p.m„, by
fill*wing vote of the members thereof:
BARNES, HERBST Ki
NONE
JOHNSON
DAViD
WITNESS WHEREOF, i have herunto
ANAHEHI CATY PLANNiN COMMiSSMN
)RLE
TOLAR
h prior to
y hand this 17th day of January
ESOLUTION NO PC77-11