PC 77-113.
RESOLU710t~ N0. PC77-113
l'c RES~LU.T'~ON Q~ TNC ANAHEII! C17Y PLAI~tiING COMHISSIOI~
THAT ~~TCT;ol1 fGv ~itiDIT10~~AL USE PERNIT tl0. iJ08 BE GRANT[D Ili PART
NHERf/~S, tn^ kna~~•°ic~ City Planniny ~ommission did receive a verified
Petition for Gs~~.;;'i~t!nnal u;e Pcrr.iit from T[XACO At1AHCIH HILLS, INC., 3~5~~ '~-~lshire
Boulevard, L-^: A~~geles, ~alit'ornia 90010, Owner, and CLYDE CARPLtJTEP. L ASSUCIATES,
IIIC., 7.92 Wi~%~~.',~.~ ~ Aaenue, Suitc 103, Anaheiin, California ~2201, a9ent of certain
rcal property :ituatcJ in thc City of Anahein, Coun[y of Oranyc, State of California,
de>cr~ti:.d as:
'a=st~1 "L, as shown un a ffap recorded in twok 55, page 21 of Parcel
Maps, in the office of the County KecorJer of said Orange County;
an,f
WUEREAS, [he City Planninc,• Conu~iission did hold a public hearin9 at the City
liall in th~ City of Anahein on t1ay 2;, 1977, at 1:30 p.n., noticc of said publie
hearing having been duly given as required by law and in accordance with the
provisions of the Anahcim Municipal Code, Ghapter 1L•.03, Co hear and consider
evidence for and against said pruposeJ condi[ional use and te investigate and make
fi~Jinys and recomrnendations in connec[ion thcrewith; and
WHLttEAS, said Lornmissiun, af[cr due inspection, investiyation and study made
by itself and in its befialf, and after Jue consideration uf all evidence and reports
offered at said hearin~, uoes find an~ de[crriinc thc followiny facts:
i. That the proposed use is properiy one for which a condi[ional use
permit is authorized by Anahein Municipal Code Section 1ii,h4.050.070 to construct an
automobiie service station wi[h waivers of:
a. SEGTIUIIS lii.Q~.O)1.020 - PermitteJ wall siyniny. (One wall sign
ANU lu.o .0~2.0~0 pcrrnitted oniy on thc building wall most nearly
facing [he pump islands; one wall sign proposed
on thc buildin9 wall fur[hes[ frorn the p~np
islands)
b. SECTIOfI 1S.J4.Ou2.01.'. - Minimur~ buildin setback.
j0 feet required; 33~et proposed)
c, SECTIOII 1'3.~:7.OJ0.072 - Landsca ii~ ad'acent to interior boundar lines.
2~ [rces required; none proposed
2. That thc proposed usc consistiny of an automobilc service station in
the CL (SC) (GOMHEP,CIAL, L1111TED-SCENIC CORRIDOR OV[RLAY) ZOt~E is ti~reby granted.
3. That Waivcrs 1-a, 1-b and 1-c, above mentioned, are hereby denled on
the basis tfiat the petitioncr did not demonstrate tha[ the property cannot be
developed in full conplfance with the Zoning CoJe regula[ions pertaining to the
CL(SC) Zonc and [he Service Station Ordinance; that the subject proposal is an
inte~ral part of a siiopping cen*_=r which is only partially developed~ and additional
land appears to be available for development in full compliance with Code
regulations; tfiat there are no special circumstances applicable [o the propercy,
includiny size, shape, [opograpfiy, location or surrc,undin~s, which do na[ apply to
PC77-1t3
other propcrty undr: i~~ntical zoning classification in thc vicinity; and that if
subject walvers were yranted, an ~andesirable precedent may be established in the
Scenic Corridor.
4, That the petitioner submit precise building anJ landscaping plans to
the Planning Commission fur rcview and approval prior to issuance of building
pcrmits.
5, That the proposcu ~ortherly off-site driverray sliali be fully improved
to provide safe vehicular access to and froi~ the subject property prior xo final
building a~d zoning irispections; or, if such improverien[s have not been made,
vehieular access to the north shall be prohibit~d by a~i effc~tive barricr consisti~9
of landscapiny and 6-ineh tiigh conr.retc curbs.
6. That the proposed w e, as 9ranted, will not advcrscly affect t.hc
adjoining land uses anci [he yray[h and Jevclopracn[ of the area in which it is
proposeJ co be located.
7, 7hac the ~izc and shape of thc site proposed for [hc usc, as yranted,
is adequai~ to allow the full develor~m~nt of the proposccl usc in a manner not
detrimental [~ [hc particular area nor to [he pcacc, hcalth, safety, and general
welfnre of [he Litizcns of thc City of Ar.ahcin.
U, Thot the Conditiona~ ilsc Pcrmik, as yranted, and under thc conditions
imposeJ~ will not bc detrinental to [hc pcocc~ hcalth, safety and ycncral welfare of
the Citizens of the City of /`~naheim.
g, Tha[ or~Q person indicated his presence at said public hearing in
opposition anJ no correspondence w~s receivcJ in opposition to the subject petition.
Et:VIRONI~ENTl1L IMPACT FIIIDItiG: ihaC £nvironrnental Impact Report No. S5 was
prepared ~rtien a yradiny plan or the shopping cantcr was submitted to thc Ci[y of
Anaheim; tfiat the project consiJereJ unJer sai~i EIR consisteJ of a community shoppin9
center with a service station similar to the prnposal; that said Elf: was certified by
[he Ci[w Council on J~nuary 3~~ 1973: and that thc Planning Gormiss?on hereby
determinei that since said EIR IJo. G5 adequately consiciereJ the service station use
of subject ~;~roperty, no further action is n~ecessary.
IJ04a, THEREFORE, fiE IT RESOLVED that thc An~hcirn City Planniny Commission
doey her~b4 grant, in part, subject Petition for Conditional Usc Perm~t, upon the
following condiLions wliich are liereby founJ tu bc a nccessary prcrequisi[e to ttie
propa~ct.:i use of the subj~~ct propcrty in order to prescrvc thc safety and gencral
welfa;t of the Citizcr.s of thc City of Anaheim:
1, That trash storaye areas shall be pruvided in accordance with approved
plans o~i fife witr [hz Office of [f~e Uirec:or of Public Works.
2. Th~t fire hydrants sfiall be installed and charged, as reQuircd and
determined ~~ `~°~ «~~essary 6y the Chief of the Firc ~epartr,ient, prlor to commencement
of structurai fran~ing.
3, Thac appropriate water asscssment fees, as dctermined by [hc Director
of PuU{ic, Utilities, shall bc poid to thc: City of Anahcim prior [o thc issuance of a
buflding permit.
-z- Pc77-t~3
1E, Thai subject propert'y stiall be developed in full campiiance with all
applicable Zoi~iny Code regulations.
5, That ihe propose~ northerly off-site driveway, as Jepictcd on thc plans
on file with Chc Ci[y of Anaheim marked Exhib~[ Nos. i through 5, shall be fully
improved prior to final building anJ zoniny inspections; or vefi~cular access to the
north shall be prohibited by an effcctive barrier consisting of landscaping and 6-
inch high concretc curts.
6. 7hat precise hutldiny and landscaping plans shall be sub~~itted to the
Planning Conmission for review and approval pricr to the issuance of a buildi~g
pcrmit.
7, Tha[ ConJi[ion Nos. 1 an~ ti, above mentioned, sha~l be conplied ~aith
prior to final builJi~g and zonin; insrections.
THE FORC•GOING RESOLUTION is siyneJ an~1 approved by me this 23rd day of May,
~977.
_ ~ ~"~e~.s~Lf~ !/ ~G'Y~-
CHAIflhlAil PRO TEt1PORE
AllldiE I N C 1 TY PLANN I NG COMP11 SS 101~
ATTEST:
~~~
S ECRET , AIIA{iC i FI C~ TY PLlUI;I l i!G COIit11551 ot~
STA7E OF CAL I FORt11 A)
COU;ITY 9F OR/1t~GE ) ss.
CITY OF ANf~HE1N )
t, Edi[h L. tlarris, Secret~ry of tfic Anaheim City Planning Commission, do
hereby certify th~t Chc forc~~oing resulution was passcd and adoptcd at a mcetin9 of
the Anahelrn City Planniny f,oramission hcld on May 23, 1~%%, at 1:30 p•m., by tl~e
f~llowiny votc of thc in~:r~bers thcreof:
AYES: COMt115Sl~tl[RS: [lARt1E5, DAV~ii, IIEROST, I~ING, Llt~fl, TOLAR
NOES: COMI'~ISSIONERS: NOI~E
ABSENT: COMHISSIDNERS: JOHNSOt~
IN 411TNE~5 uilE.RI:UF, I have hereun[o sex my h~nd this 23rd Jay of May, 1977.
1;~ ~° ~a~,.~,
SECRETARY, AIIk11Elt1 CITY 4'I.ANt711aC, COMt115SI0N
-3- Pt77-t13