PC 77-159RESOLUTION N0. PC77-159
A RESOLUTIOFI OF THE ANAHE!.'9 CITY f'LANWItlG C011MISSION
THAT PETITION FOR CCNUITIDtlAL USE P[RMIT t~0. 171G 6E DEh71CU
WHEREAS, [he Anaheim City Planniny Commission did receive a verificd
Petition for Conditir~na) Use Perni[ from WILLIAN H. At~U CATHEP,INE A. ~RADLEY, 402
Paseo Serena, Anahcim, California 92007, o.+ners of ccrtain real property si[ua[ed in
the City of Anaheim, County of Ora~ye, State of Lalifornia, described as:
Lot 77 of Tract tlo. d220, as shovrn on a 11ap recorded in Book 335,
pages 33 to 41 inclusive, of Miscellaneous Haps, records of Orange
County, California; anJ
WHEREAS, the Lity Planning Gommission did schedule a public heariny at the
City Hail in the Ci[y of Anaheim on June 2~), t977, at 1:30 p.m., ~otice of Said
pubiic heariny haviny been eluly yiven as requireJ by la~•1 ~nJ in accordance with the
provisions of the Anaheim 1lunicipal Code, Chapter 12.0;, [o hear and consider
evidence for and ayainst said proposeJ conditional use and ta investiga[e anJ nake
findings and recammendations in connection therea,ith; said public hearing havine, been
continucd Co the Flanning Comruission neetiny of July li;, 197/; and
WHEREAS, said Cor~nission, afccr due inspection, inves[iyaticn and study made
by itself and in its behalf, and after duc consideration of all evidence and reports
offered at said iieariny, does finJ and deterrine [tie i0II0141(1(~ facts:
1. That Che proposed use is properly onc for which a co~ditional use
permiC is authorized by M ahein N~unicipal Code Section 12.O~.Oj0.010, [o wit: to
permit solar collector panels.
2. That tfie proposal is hereby denied on the I~asis that the subject
property is located in the Scenic Corridor Overlay Zone wnich specifically prohibiis
roof-mounted eyuipment; ttiat tlie proposal is visuaily objectionable and is fuily
visible frum adjacen[ propertics and streets; [hat [he systeri was not designed in a
manner which would make it visually inte~,~rated and architec2urally compatible with
the resiJence, altliouyh other systems which ~•rould appear Co be acceptable in the
Scenic Corrido~ are available; [hat tlie use was illegally es[ablished in viola[ion of
the Scenic Corridor regulatians and witliou[ a building permit; and that an
undesirable precedent o+ould bc es[ablished if the proposal were permittPd.
3, That the proposed use r+ill adversely affect tlie aJjoining land uses and
the grow[h and development of the ar~a in t•~hich it is proposed to be located.
4. That the si~e and shape of the site proposed for ttie use is not
adequate to allow the full developrnent of Chc proposed use in a manner not
detrimental to the particular area nor to the peace, healtfi, safety, anJ general
welfare of the Citizens of the City af Analieim.
5. That thc gran[iny of the Conditional Use Permit will be detrimental to
the peace, health, safety and yeneral welfare of the Citizens of the City of Anaheim.
PC77-159
b. That ten {10) persons indicated their suppor[ of the proposed use an4
four (4) people indicaCed their opposition to tlie requesk; and that thirteen (13)
le[ters were received supporting the request, and one (1) letter was received in
opposition to the request.
EIiVIRONMEI~T~L 119PACT F~tJUI,~G: That the Director of the Planning Department
has determ(ned [hat the proposed activity falls within the definition e` 'ection
3.p1, Class 1, of the City of Anaheim Guidelines to the Requiremer for an
Environmental Impact Report anJ is, therefore, categorically exempt rro~~ the
requirement to file an EIR.
PJOIJ, Tfi[IiEFOftE, DE IT RESOLVED that t4ie Anaheim City Planning Comnission
does hereby deny s~bject Petition for Conditional Use Permit on the basis of the
aforementioned findinys.
1977.
TNL FOP,EGOING RESOLUTIOfd is siyneJ and approved by me this lpth day of July,
~,~~~~~v ~. ~
CtiAIR11AN, At~AHEIM CrTY LAtlt~ING OMnISSION
ATT[:ST:
~ l~~~.
SECRETAR , A~EIM CITY PLAtIt~ING COHMISSION
STAT[ OF CALIFORIJI~ )
COUNTY OF OiiAUGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAIiElt1 )
I, Ldith L. Harris, Secretary of the AnahPim City Planning Commission, do
hereby certify that ttie foreyoiny resolution wa~ passed and adopteJ at a meeting of
Che Anahein City Planning Cortunissic:n held on July 18, 1~77, at 1:30 p.m., by the
following vote of the membcrs thereof:
AYES: COM1115SIOI~ERS: UARtI[S, ~JAVID, iIERESST, JOHNSOt~, KIFIG, LIIJN~ TOLAR
t~OES: COHI1ISSIOt~ERS: NOl~E
ABSEl~T: COMI~115SIOIIERS: ~I01lE
Itl WITNESS 41HEREUF, I have hereunto set my hand this 13th day of July, t977.
/„ ~ ~ ~~~1/~
SECRETARY, Al~nlfElN CITY PLAt~NIi~G COMMISSION
-2- Pc77-t59