PC 77-193,~. ~
RE50LUTIOt~ N0. PC77-193
A RESOLUTION OF TtiF At~AfiE~1M CI7Y PLANNING COMMISSIOI!
THl1T PETiT16~i ~^R COPIDITIONAL USE PERMIT N0. 1750 BE DENI[D
WHEREAS, the Anaheim City Planniny Commission 1id receive a verified
Petitien for Conditional Use Permit from RICFIARD JAY A~~D TO~~IA LYNi~ K:~UFMAM, 803
Cinda Street, Anaheim, California 92806, arners, and FA111LY GROUP N01•1E5 FOUNDATION,
1~20 East Katella Avenue, Suite U, Oranye, California 926G7, agent, of certain real
property situated in thc CiCy of Anaheim, County of Oranye, State of California,
described as:
Lot 34 of Trac[ 41G$ as per map recorded in book 150, pages 14 and
15 of 1liscellaneous Haps, records of said county and sta[e; and
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did hold a public liearing at the City
Hall in [he City of Anaheim on September 12, 1;77, at 1:30 p.m., notice of said
public hearing having been duly yiven as required by law and in accordance with the
orovisions of the Anaheim Hwiicipal Code, Chapter 1~'.03, [o hcar and consider
evidence for and against said proaosed conditional use and t~ inves[iyate and make
findings and recommendatians in connection therewith; and
WNEREAS, said Commission, aftcr duc inspection, investigation and study made
by itself anJ in iis behalf, and after due consideration of all evidence and reports
offered at said hearing, does find and Je[ermine the following facts:
1. That tlie proposed use is properly one for which a condit(onal use
perm(t is authorized by Anatieirn Mur.icipal Code Section 1~.2G.05''i.010, to wit: to
permit a children's group home.
2. That the proposed conditional use permit is hereby denied on the basis
that the yroup liome has becn operating a~ithou[ the approval of a conditional use
permit and problems wi[h the neiyhbors have occurred; and thai the use, as proposed
and existiny, fias had a deletcriuus impact on the surrounding single-fanily uses.
3. That the proposed use will adverscly affect the adjotning land uses and
the growth and developmenc of the area in which it is proposed to be located.
4. That the size and shape of the site proposed for [he use is not
adequate ta allow the full deveiopment of the proposed use in a manner not
detrlmenial [o the particular area nor to the peace, health, safety, and general
welf~re of the Citizens of Che City oP Anaheim.
5, That the grantiny of [he Co~ditional Use Permit will be detrimc;ntal to
the peace, health, safety and yeneral ti•relfare of [he Ci[izcns of [he Lity of Anaheim.
G. That approximately 31 persons indicated their presence at said publlc
he~ring in opposition and one let[er and a petition containing 50 signatures from 42
addresses were received in oppositi~n.
EI~VIROtIMENTAL IMPACT FII~DING: That the Director of [he Planning Department
fias determined that the c~roposed activity falls wlthin the definition of Section
3.01, Class 1, of tf~e CEty of Anaheim Guideiines to tne Requirements for an
Environmentai fmpact Report and 'ss, therefore, categorically exempt from the
requirement to file an EIP..
PC77-193
NOW~ TIiEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Pianning Commission
does hereby deny subject Peti[ion for Conditional Use Permlt on the basis of the
aforementioned findi~gs.
THE FOREGOItlG RESOLUTION is signed and approved by me this 12th day of
September, 1977.
!/ - L9~
CHAtRMAt~, AN!\HEIM CITY PLA NING COHMISS!Oti
ATTEST:
~~~ .~.° ~~
SECRETARY, At1AtIEIM CtTY PL/U~Pl1(~G C011r.IS510t1
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORA~IGE ) ss.
CI1'Y OF At1ANE1M )
I, Edith L. Harris, Secretary of the Anaheim City Pla~ning Commission, do
hereby cer[ify that the foregoin9 resolution was passed and adopted a[ a rr~eeting of
the Anaheim City Planning Commission lield on September 12, 19j7, at 1:3Q p.m., by the
followirtg vote of the members thereof:
AYES: C011MISSIOIJCRS: UARtlCS, DAVID, tiERLST, JOHt~SOt~, KIt~G, TOLAR
NOES: COMIiISS101lERS: NOt~E
ADSEIJT: COMMISSIONERS: LII~N
t977.
It~ W17t~E5S W1IEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this i2th day of Saptember,
~_~ r ~ ~~
SECRE7ARY, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNIIiG COMMISSIOt~
-2- PC77-193