PC 77-20RESOLl;TiON N0. PC77-20
A RESOL'ITION OF THE ANAHEIH CITY PLAMNIMG COMMI55?Gr.
THAT PETiTION FOR VAP,IANCE N0, 2896 BE ~RANTED.
~HEREAS, the Anahefm Cfty Pl7nning CcMmisslon dl~ receive a vPri`ied
Petftlon far Varfance '~rom B, ALLE~i G ETHEL SUMNER, MEYER E, L DfiROiNY M, Y~Ti, FND
FLORENCE ROYE, 61? N, 5ierra Drlve, Beverly Hllls, Californi~ qr~z4 (Owners); LEOb A..
MILLER b PAUL R. WILLIAMS, 12522 Brookhurst Stree[, ?10, Garden Grove, Crlifornia
92640 (Agents) of certsin reai ,~r~perty situated in thc Ci[y of Anahclrn, County of
Orange, State of Cslifornla Aescribed as:
Lot 35, Trect 2723, in the City of knaneim, as ner maG ~eccrdeC (n bcok F'v, paqes
19 to 21 Incluslve, Mlscellsneous tiaps, in che Office of .he Cnunty Recorder of
sa(d Count•~,
~~~c4EAS, thr City Planning CommiSSion did hold a public hearing at [he City
Hall in the CI[y of Anahefm on Jbnuary 17, 1977, ~t 1:3C a.m,, notlcr of sald publlc
hearing having been duly given as requircd by !er. and in accordanc~ Nith the
provlsions cf the Arsaheim Municin~l Code, Chapter 18.03, t~ hear and ronsider
evidcnce for and agalnst sa1C pr~posed varla~ce and to Investigate and make ffndings
and r,ecommendations In connec[lon therew(th; and
WHEREAS, sald Commissl~n, after due laspectlc,n, Investlqatlon and study mt~de
by itself and ln its behalf, end a¢ter due cons!deratlon of ail evldence ar,d reports
offercd at sald hearing, boes 1'Ind anG detcrrnlrc the fiol;o»inq fac[s:
1. That [he petltloner proposes [hc following wafvers firom thc Anahelm
Municlpal Ccde, to construct a seven-untt, cwo-story apartment complex:
a. SECTION 18.34,052.012 - Mar.lmum bull~dln~_ ~he~l ~ht. ~;1 story
~ permlt[e ;~ sto-r ~T s prcpcsed)
h. SECTION 1~,j4.OG3.023 - Minlmum structural setback,
~ eet requ rc ; ~ ee2 proposed)
2. That uaivcr i-a, ahcve-mentloned, Is hereby granted on the basis that
the subJect property ls surrounded on all sldes by Lwo-story apartment development
and, furthermore, thc subJect prop~rty I> >epareCed from the single-famlly zone by
[rro-story buildings.
3. That ualver 1-b, abovc-mentloned, ls hereby gronted on the basls tha[
the affected structure ls a carport whfch allgns s+ith the cnrport on the adJacent
property to the north; tha[ the petl:loner indlcated that the proposed carport is
atttached to the maln structure for de~ign efflclency reasons, however, the maln
structure: wlil meet the setback requlrements; and, further, that the property ormer
to tha north ha~ no ob)octlon to the requcsted waivcr,
4, That there are exceptlonal or extraordlnary circumstances or cor,dltlons
applicable to [he property involved or to 2he intended use of the property that do
not apply generelly to the property or class of use In the ~ame vicinlty and zone.
5. That the requested variance Is necessAry for the preserva[lon and
en)oyment of a substantlal property r14ht possessed by other property In the same
vlcinity and zone, ar.d denled to the property ln questlon.
aESOLUTION h0. PC77-20
6. That thc nequested vari~nce Nill not be matcr~ally detrlm~nt~i to :he
publlc welfare or inJurious to the property or improvements In ;ur_'~ vicinity and ~~,ne
•!n wh(Ch th~. properiy Is located.
7. That one (!) persors appeared at sald pubilc hearing i~i uppositlon; and
th~t no c~rrespondence ras received !n oppositlon tc, Che subJecY pet~tlon.
EFlVIRONMENTAL ItiPACT REPOaT FINDING: Tha[ :'~e Anaheim Clty Planning
Commisslon does hereby recomrcicnd to the Clty Councf~ of thr Ciry of Anaheim that a
~egative declaratlon fror^ the raqcirerent :o preaarc an envlronmental imnact reCOrc
be approved for the subJec[ proJect, purs~anc :o r.he provisfons of the Lalifornia
Envlronmental Quallty Act.
!lOW, TIiERE~ORE, BE IT °ESOLNED [hat [hr. Anahelm City Planniny Commission
does hereby grant subJect Pe[ftlor for Variance, upon the `ollr,wlnc} condl~ions whfch
are trereby found to be a nccessary prerequlsite to the proposed use o` the subject
propc ~:i ordcr to preserve the satety and gencrei welfere of the Citizens oT the
City ot Anahcim:
That subject proper[y shall be s~rved by underoround ut111ties.
2. That the owncr or su5lect propr_rtv shall pay to the City uf Ar•ahelm the
approprfate park and recrea~.lon in-lleu fees as determined to be approprlacc hy the
Ctty C~,uncil, sald faes to be pald a[ the timc Che bullA(ng pern~lt Is ls~ued.
3. That subJec[ property shall be developed substantlally In accordance
with plans and speclficatlons on file wlth th9 City of Anahefm marked Exhihle Nos. 1
through 3.
4, That Conditlon Nos. 1 and 3, above-mentloned, shall be complled Nith
prlor to ffnal bullding and zonfng Inspectlons.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is stgned and approvod by mc thfs i7th day of
JBnuarY. ~977.
!/s y~~
CHAIKMAN PRO TEMP RE
ANA4EIM CITY PLANNING CONMISSION
ATTEST:
~ • ~ ,/
c R~ ATiY, n e n c TY'""~T~ir, connT'sio~~
-2- RESOLUTION 40. PC77-20
STATE Of CALIFORNIA )
~OUNTY OF OI,aNGE }s..
CITY OF ANANEIM )
I, Patrlcla B. Scan~an, ~~~rct•+ry of thc Anahelm City Planning Comnisslon,
do hereby certify that the fura?c„nc r~,~:i~,C(on was paased and adopted at a meeting
of the Anahelm City Planning Cc.rymis~~vn, ~;eld on Januery 17, 1977, at 1:30 p.m., by
th*. follawing vote of thc mamrer. t~,recf~
AYES: COMMISSIOHERS: BARNES, DP,ViC, KING, MORLEY, TOIAR
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: HER65T
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: JOHNSON
'•977.
IN NITNESS WHEREOF, I havc hereu~to set my hand this 17th day of January
~ ~ ~
CRE R, NAMEIH CI LANNING COMMISSION
-3- RESOLUTION N0. PC77-20