PC 77-209RESOLUTION FIO. PC77-209
A RESOLUTIOII OF THE AtlAHEIM CITY PLAN!~IhG CONMISSIOIJ
THAT PCTITIO~! FOR Vl1RIAtlCE N0. 29G3 E3E GRAIITED
4fNEREAS, the Anahedm City Planning Cormission did receive a verified
Pc•:itio~ for Va~iance from IIIlES AND FMILY GUICi1ET, 100 Strada Place, Anaheim,
C~iifornia 97.SQ1, owncrs of certain real property situated in the City of Anaheim,
i:.o:an~y of Oranye, State of California, dcstribed as:
!_ct ~+ af rract 120. 3G3;, as sho~m on a Map recorded in 6ook 366,
~z~gcs fi and 7 ar" Miscellaneous Naps, records of Orang~ County,
Galifornia; and
W~{`{~E,15, the City Planning Commissio~ did hold a public hearing at the City
~iail iR t~e City of Anaheim on September 12, 1977, at 1:30 P•m., notice of said
public hearing haviny been duly yiven as required by lao~ and in accorJance with the
provisions ~f the M aheiri Municipal Code, Chapter 1~.03, to hear and consider
ev:~,dence for ~nd against said proposed varianc, and [o i~vestigate and maF:e findings
and recommenda~ions in connec[ion therewith; and
4lIIERENS, said Commission, after clue inspection, investi~a[ian and study rnade
by itself and in its behalP, and after due considcration of al1 evidence and rep~r[s
offered at sald heo~•i:~g, Joes find and detcrmine the following facts:
1, That tfie peti[ion~r proposes a waiver of the following to construc[ a
tennis court:
S[C71JH lu.Z2.Oti3•010 - Minimum re uired setback.
15 eet required; 0-7 feet proposed)
2, That the above-mentionc~ waiver is hereby granted on the basis that the
petitEoner demonstrated tha[ a hardship exists in that subjcc[ property has an
irregular shape and is developeJ in a rnanner prohibitiny development of a standard
sized tennis court without encroaching into one or the other side yards.
3. Tliat tlie ~bove-mentioned waiver is hereby gran[ed subject Co
petitioner's stipulations r.o provide dense lanJscaping as shown on Exhibi[ ~~~. 1;
[haC the lighting will be environmental liyhting directed do;Hn and away from adjaeent
residential areas; and that appropriate screening shall be provided on the chainlink
fence to the north, northeast, nur[hwest, and south sicies of *he tennis court, in
accordance wi[h plans marked [xhibit 1~0. 1, in order to view screen sald court from
the adjacen[ propcrties.
4. That there are exceptional or extraordinary circumster~ces or conditions
appltcable to the property involved ~r [o the in[ended usc of the ~>ropcrCy that do
not apply generally to the property or class of use in the same vicinity and zone.
5. That the reques[ed variance is necessary far the preservation and
enjoym~nt of a substantial pruperty right po,sessed by other property in the same
vicinity anJ zone, and denied to the pro~~erty in ques[ion,
~c77-2o9
6. 71iat the requested variance will not be materiaily detrirncntal to the
pubiic wei`are or injurious to the property or improvements in such vicinity and zone
in which the property is located.
7, That no one indicated their presence at said public hearing in
opposition; an~l that one letter was received in opposition to the suuject petition:
and one petition containing five signa[ures supporting the subject petiLion was
receiveJ.
Ei~VIR01lMEt~TAL It1PALT FIIJUiIlG: That t~~e Uirector of [he Plannin, Department
has determined tf~at the proposed activity falls wi:t~in the definition of Section
3.01, Class 3, of tlie City of Anah~.ir~ Guidelines to the Requirements for an
Environmental Impact Report and is, tlier•r.fore, ca[egorically exempt from the
requirement to file an EIR.
NQ'~J, TfiEREFOR[, tiE IT RL'SOLVED that the Anahcim City Planning Cammission
does hereby grant subject Petition far 4ariance, upon the following conditions which
are hereby found [o be a ne.:essary prereyuisite to the proposed use af the subject
property in order to preserve tne sarety and general welfare of [he Citiz~ens of the
Ci[y of Anaheim:
1. That subject nrc~pe'[y shall be developed substantially in accordance
with plans and specifications on fiie with the City of Anaheim mar4:ed Exhibit l~os. 1
through 3.
2, That dense landscaping will be provided in accordance with plans marked
Exhibit I~o. 1.
3, That li9htiny stiall be environn~ental liyhting, directed down and away
from adjacent resident(al areas and in accordance wi[h plans mar~ed Exhibit No. 1.
4, That appropriate scree~Erg shall be provided on the cl~a?nlink fence to
the north, nortficas[, norttnaest, and souti~ sides of subject tennis court in
accordance with plans marl:ed Exliibit I~o. 1.
Ti1E. FOREGOING RESOLUTI011 is siqneJ and approved by me this 12th day of
Septembc:r, 1977•
v'
~ CHq~RMAN, ANAHEIFI CITY PIANNl4~ C MNISSION
ATTEST:
(oo~[.~- ~ /Y~~t ~ ~~
SECRETARY, ANAHEIN CITY PLAtItiING COMHISSIOtI
STATE 6F CALIFORNIA )
COUIlTY OF OR/~NGE ) ss.
CITY OF At~Al1E111 )
_2_ PC77-209
I~ Edith Le Harris, Secretary of the Anaheim Cicy Planning Commission, da
hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted a[ a r~ecting of
the Anahein City Planning Commission held on September 77., 197?. at i:30 p.m.~ by the
following vote of the members thereof:
AYES: COM1115SIOtlERS: BARt~ES~ DAVID~ liER85T~ kitt~, Lllll~s TOLAR
t~OES: CGt1MIS510NER5: JONtl5011
AL'SEtlT: C011MISSIO~~ERS: NON£
1977.
Itl WITIJESS UHEREOF~ I have hercunto set nry liand tt~is 17.th day of September,
~ ~ ~ 7~
SECRLTARY, ANANE114 LITY PLAtItlltlG COMI115510!!
-3- Pc77-2o9