PC 77-211RESOLUTIOiJ N0. PC77-211
RESOLUTI0;1 OF 7lIE AtIlUIE111 CITY PLAI7NING COHMISSIO'~
TNAT PETITIOII FUR VARIAhLE 110. Z°G4 BL GRAt~TEU
4lHEREAS, the Anahei~n City Planninc focnaission Jid receiv~ a verified
Pe[ition for Variancc fror~~ At1AHElt~ tIILl.S, ItIC., 3b0 Anahr_ic~ Hills Road, Anahcim,
California 9230G, avner, and JANES N. ESEKP.Y, 1;,092 Sky Par~ South, Su'ste A, irvine,
California 9'L711i, a~~ent, uf certain rcal pruperty situatcd in the City of Anahein,
County of Oran~e, Statc of California, ~escribcd as:
That portion of Pzrcel 1 of the land describzd in deed recorded in
Gook 9~~1~~, pagc );i/ of ~ffieial Rteords ~n thc OffEee of thc
Goun[y RecorJcr of saiJ County; bciny ~•~ithin tifc Rancho Santiago
Jc Santa ~na as pcr raap oF parti[ion rccnr~icu Septcnbcr• 12, loGb,
pagc 410 in BooF. "I3" of Judgnknts uf the iJth Judieial Court, Los
M~~cles Guunty, California, descri;:ed ris beUinninr~ at [he
intcrscction of [hc Sou[hcrly linc of Parcci S of thc land shown
on map riled in book ital, payes 11 throu~h 1~, of Parcel Naps of
said Grange County, witl~ the Easterly line of CoverecJ Uacnn Trail
as show~ on said m:~p, said point uf beginninc, bciny in a eurvc
tonc,>.c South~•~estcrly with a radius of "L;`..C~1 fecc, a radial to
said p~~int bcars North bh° 3~~' ;.i" East; th~ncc l~urthwcstcrly
alon, said curve 1;1.1i feet through a een[ral anr~le of 32° 07'
jt+"; Chcncc North j7~ :2~ 5>" l+esl jl.ll fcet [o a tanycnt cufve
concave Northeas;erly havin~~ a radius of 223.00 feet; thence
,JorthwesCCrly along s~i~ curvc !3Q.?: fcct throur~h a central an~lc
of 2;° ~2' 34"; ther.cc [angcnl [o sr,id curvc Nor[h 14° 10' 21"
4lest 11.17 feeC to a[anyeii[ curve concave Southwesterly wi!h e
radius of 60~i.~~ feet; thencc 1~orthti+esterly alo~sc; said curve
27Q.74 feet through a central an~~lc uf 2y° 3~'' 02" to o targent
reversC w rve concave Nor[hcasterly tirith a ra~ius o( ~2~.00 fce[;
thence :~orthw~sterly alon, saiu curve 4.~7 feet through a central
angle of 1~ 05' 1~" to a t~nuent cumpound curve conc~v~ Eas.erly
with a radius of 1'r.:~) fcec; thencu IJorthcrly .~lon, said eurvc
31.G'; fe~•[ throu~.~h a centr„1 a~nlr: of 100° 52' 3~'"; thence tanqent
to said curvc Nor[h (~2° 03' 2;" Easi 1Z(~.9E fcr_t to a[angent
eurve con w ve Southensterly with a radius of 229.0~ fect; [hence
Easterly along said curvc SS.~~3 fcct throu~~h a cen[ral angle of 23°
5h' 34"; thcnec tan;ent to said ;;urvc Nort1~ sG° 07' 03" East 57.Ej
fee[ to a[~ngent curve concave Northwestcrly wiCh a radiu, of
4Gy.Q~ feet; thenc~ t7ortheasterly along said curve 133,22 feet
Chrouql~ a central an~;:~ of 15° 53' 0;3"; thence tangeni. co said
curve Ncrth G'1° 1:' ;~ti" East 9C.50 fce[; thenca North 7'>° 32' 12"
East u`~.4u fee[ to a poin[ in ~ non-[~nyen[ curve concave
Southwcsieriy with a radius of 273.~~~ feet, a raJ~al Co said point
be~rs Il~rth 11° Q`3' S~' '~est; thenc~: SouLheasterly alon~~ said
w rve 1i9;).1~ fee[ throu~~h a ccntral an~~lc of.102~ S1' S2"; Chence
tangenc to said curve South 1° 41' S4" Ucst E~.;; fect [o a
tane~ent c~rve concavc ~:o~th~Yes[erfy with a radius of 221.~~ feet;
[hence Sauttiwesterly rilong saiJ curve 17f,.91 feet through a
central ar~~le of fi5° 51' S~"; [hence canyent tn said curve South
~+7° 33' Sz" Uest 2;9.51 feet t~ a tangent curve concave
PG77-211
korthwesterly with a radius of 100.00 feet; thence Southo-~esterly
alon said curve 1~.02 feet through a central angie of 10° 1~~
°j~'y Lhence tangent to said curve South 57~ 53' 2~~~ ~~est A0.9G
feet to a tangent curve cancave [asterly with a radius of 64.00
feet; thence Southerly ~31ong said curve 103.1~s feet through a
central angle of :2~ 22' t4"; the~ce tangent to said curve South
j!~~ 2~' 4G" cas[ 2~.:.09 feet to said Southerly linc; therce alanq
said Southerly line South ]U° 44' 27" West 117•75 ~ee[, iJorth 59~
09' 31" West 119.y5 feet, North 13° 47' O1" East 27.73 feet and
t~orth 79° ~+~' 1z" West 1>2.07 fect to the poin[ of beginning.
Contairiing an area of 11.1+)6 acres, more or less; ~~d
WHEREAS, the City Planning Comrnission JiJ hold z public hearing at the Gity
Nall in Yht C~ty of Anaheim on Septembei~ i2, 1977, at 1:3~ P•~•, notice of said
public heariny having been duly given as required by law and in accordance with the
provisions of the Anaheim 11unicipal Code, Chapter 1~.03, to hear and consider
evidence for and against said proposed variance and to inve~tigate and make findings
and recommendations in connection there4:ith; anJ
WtiEREAS, s~iJ Commission, aftcr duc inspection, invcstigation and study made
by itself and in its behalf, and after due considcration of all evidence and reports
offered at said hearing, does `ind anu dctermine the folla•iiny facts:
1, That the petitionr_r proposes a waiver of the follrn~in9 to establish a
2~3-lot, RS-5000(SC) subdivision:
SECTION l0.°_7.OG1•O10 ' ~linirium Luildiny pad area. (5~~~~ s uarc fee[
rcyuired; 1) pad areas rangin9 f~77 to
~~Q56 square fect prapused)
2. That the above-i~entioned waiver is hereby granted on *_he basis that the
petitioner demonstrateu that a hardship exists in thae the size and shape of suoject
property is suitable for patio-type development, in ~•~hich case, minimal buildable pad
areas are acceptable; that tfie typical proposed lot sizes substantial{y exceed the
minimum required by the Zoniny Code an4 subs[antial opcr. space is part of each lot in
the form of landscaped slopes; and that Jue to tne existing substan[ially sloped
tzrrain, adJitional graciin9 wou!d be requirca to ~stablish minimur~ buildiny pad areas
of ~000 square feet.
3, That there arc exceptional or ex[raordinary ~ircumstan~es or conditions
applicable to tlie property involveJ or to tlie in[ended use uf t!ie property that do
~ot apply ~enerally l'o the property or class of use in tlie same vicinity and zone.
1i, That thc requested variance is necessary for the ~reservation and
enjoyrient of a substantial property riyht possessed by other property in the same
vicinity and =one, and JenieJ tu the property in question.
5, That the requcsted variance will not 6: r~aterialiy detrimental to the
pubiic kelfare or in;urious to the property ar improvements in such vicinity and zone
in wfiich tt~e property is loGatecf.
(,. Tha; no one indicateJ their presencc at said p~+blic hearing in
oppositior; and that no correspondence was received in opposition to the subject
petitlon.
-2- PC77-211
ENVIRONMcIlTAL INPACT FII~DING: That the Anafieim City Planning Lommission has
reviewed Environmyntal impact Repurt No. 205 for Tentative Tract Ne. 10031,
consisting of 2~? detached resident+al units on approximately 10.'] acres of land and
being a portion of a total deve~.pment co~sisting of a total of approximately 70
detached residential units on appror.imately 23 acres of land lecated southwest of the
intprsection of Nohl Ranch Road a.~d Anaheim Hill,s Road, having been considered this
date by the Anaheim City Planniny Commission and evidence, both wri[ten and oral,
having been pre~en2ed to supplement said EIR No. 205, finds that potential project-
generate.s indi~fiduel anel cun~ulative adverse imNacts have been reduced Co an
acceptable levei by conformance with City plans, policies~ and ordi~iances, and Drart
EIR IJo. 7_05 ~anforms to the California Environmental Quality Act and State anci City
EIR Guidelines; therefore, based upo^ verbal information presented at [he public
hearing and of previously approv~d EIR Nos. 19~! anJ 195, the Anaheim City Planning
Conmission does certify EIP. No. 7_05.
NO1J, THL'it[FORL, l1E IT P,ESOLVFG that the Anaheim City Planninn Commission
does hereby granC subject Petition for Variance~ upon the follrn~ring condition which
is hereby found to be a n;cessary prerequisite to tiie proposed use of the subject
property in order to prescrve the safety and ccneral wcifaic of the Citizens of the
C i ty of A~ahe i rn:
1, That sub.ject prope~ty shall be Jeveloped substantially in accordance
with plans and specificatiuns on file ~•rith the Ci[y of Anaheim mar4:eJ Exhibit t~os. 1
through 4.
THE FOREGOING RE50LUT101~ is signed an~ approved by me this 12th day of
Septerrber, 1977.
__-~~,,~~ ~/ ~~.~
CHAIRI1F+N, !•+~AHEIH CITY PLANIIItIG COMMISSIOt!
ATTEST:
~
' ~~~7.,,,~,.:.
SECRETARY, AtJ/1HEIH CITY PIANt~II~G CUMM15510t;
STATE Of CAL I FOP,:d I A)
COUFlTY OF OP,At1G[ ) ss.
CITY OF ANAilElhl )
I, Edi[h L. liarris, SecreCary of the Anahcim City Planning Commission, do
hereby cnrtify chat the foregoing res~~lution was passed and adopted at a meeting of
the Anaheir~ Lity Planning Commiss:~~n lield on ~epten~ber 12, 1977, at 1:30 p.m., by the
followin9 vote of the men~crs thereof:
AYES: COMt~ISSIOflERS: HERD57, JOtit~SOt~, Y.ING, TOLAR
NOES: COMMISS I QIIERS : E~ARIZES, DAV I U, L 1lltl
ADSENT: C01'IMISSIOHERS: NUIIE
IN 411T!1[SS iJHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 12th day of September,
1977•
~~.~~~ ~ ~~
SECRETAftY, i,11AHEIH CITY PLAtIPlItIG COMMISSION
-3- PC77-2it