PC 77-214RC50LiiTlL~1~ Ntl. PC77-21~;
A RESOLUT1011 QF THE At~lU1EIM CITY PR.AI~11{17G GQMMISSION
TIIAT PE71FiU1: FOR RECLASSIF9GATIOtd H0. ~7-70-20 E3E GRANTEU
W;1La[AS, the Anaheim City Planr~ing Lommission did recei~~e a verified
Petition for Reclassif~cation fror.i CALIFORNiA 70uEL b LiP,'Ei~ SU?r~LY CONP/~HY and GEOr~GE
AI~U L. Y.LtL'~ETII iiEUL[R, E7 AL. 9d6 Pianeer Urive, Mahcim, '~aiifa~rnia ,2~05, owners,
and UAVID N. FREAR, a~~ Nor2h ,Idain Street, Orange, Ca~ifnrn~~a 92G67, agent, of
certain rcal prnpcrty siCuated in the City af Anahcim, County of Or:.+n9e, Statc of
California, described as:
That portior~ of the South one-half and thc Sou[h 27 fcet of the
tiortn onc-lialf of Lot 2 cf a part of Sec[ion 4, Townshia 1~ South,
Ranye 10 ~les t as per Map f i l ed i:i Iiool: 1, Page 55 of Record of
Surveys in the office of ;,he Gounty Re~cord4r of Qra~ge Lounty;
exceptiny therefrom the 61es[ 416.~~ feet, and
11HER[ltS, [he Ci[y Plan~ir.y Commissi~on did hold a pub7ic hearing a[ the City
Hall in the Lity of Flnahcin Un OcCnl>er 10, 1:i77, a[ 1:30 p.m., no2icc of said public
hearing having becn July ~~iven as re~c.~uired by law and in accordance with the
provisions of thc Anahcim Municipal Code, Chapter i8.03, to 'hcar and considcr
evidc~ce for and against saisi propuscJ ;cclassifi w tion and [o invescigate end makc
findings ancl recommendations in connection [herewi[h; and
L/HEREAS, said Comsnission, after Juc inspection, in~icstiyatfon and sLudy made
by iXSCIf and in its behalf, anJ after Jue curisideratiun of all evidence and reporis
offered at said hcari~g, Jocs finJ and de[erminc the following ~af.CS:
t. Tha[ [iie petitiuner f,roposes reclassification of sut,jict p~operty from
thc RS-A-43,000 f,RESIUENTI/1L/AGRIGULTL'RAl) ZOIIE to thc RH-4i)00 (RLSIDEIl71Al/MULTIPLE-
FAMILY) Z01lE.
2, That thc Anaheim Cencral Plan designates su~~ject propcrty for general
conrnercial and/or r~edium-density residen[ial lar~d uses.
3. That the pro~~sed reclassification uf subjec[ property is nec.essary
and/~r desirable for the ordcrl~ and propcr development of [i~c communi[y.
4, That the ~roposed reclassification of subject property does properly
reiate to the zones and thcir pcrmitted uscs focaily established in closc proximity
to 5ubject property and to tiie zones and tncir permittcd uses gencrally established
throu,yhout the community.
~. Tha[ the proposed reciassification of subject property requires Lhe
dedica[ion and improvei^ent of abuttiny streets in accordancr. with [}ie Circula'tion
Elernent of [he General Plan, duc: to the anticipated increase in traffic which will be
generatcd by Lhe intcnsific~tinn of land use.
G. Tha[ 13 persons i~dicated tl~eir presence at sald public t~caring in
opposiLion: and that no correspundence was received in a~pposition to subject
pLtition.
PC77-21G
L•11VIRU1l11ENTAL iMPAGT fltJGii1G: That the Jlnaheim City Fla~ning 'Cornmission has•
reviewed ~ the subject proposal Ga reclassiPy the zoning from the RS-~~-~3,,000
(Residen~ial/Agriculturai) [o the Rii°4000 (Residen[ial, f~lultiple-~amily) Zonc to
establish a one-lot, 53-unit, RM-~+OQQ condominiurn .~bc~vi5ior. with waiver of rriinJmum
bui lding si te erea {~er dwel l ing uni t on approxir~u,tety 5. 1~~ acres, havinci a frontage
of approximatcly '+23 fcet ~on Lhe nor[h sic',e af La Paima Avenu~e, havi~g a max'rmun
depth of approximatcly $2J fc~et, beiny located approximate'ly 419 fc~t east of ttee
centerline oi Euclid StreeC; and decs hereby a~zprflve the t~eg<itive Declaration irom
the reyuirement to nrepare an envira~imental ampact repori on the basis that ,there
would be no significant individual ar cum~slativc advcrse env'ironmental iMpact Jue to
the approval of this ttegative Declaration sin~e. the An:~heim General Plan des'ic_~nates
the subject property for general cor„mercial anc; mediur~-density residential land uses
com~nensurate with the proposa?; [hat sio sensii~ve environnental impacts are involved
i~ti the proposal; thas the Ini[ial Study submitted by ihe petitioner indicates no
significant individual ar curaulative adverse environnental irnpacts; and thai the
I~egative Ueclaration substantiating [he foEegoiny findireqs is on fi.le in zhe City of
~1nafieim Planniny Departmen[.
NOW, TiiEREFORE, B[ IT RESOLV£D [hat the Anahein City Planniny Commission
doe~ hereby 9ran[ subjr_cY Petition for Reclassification and, hy so doinq, th~t Title
18-Zoning of the Anaheim Hunicipal Lode be anended to exclude the above-described
property from t6ae RS-A-~+3,~~0 (RESIUENTIAL/AGRICULTURAL) Z011E and to incorporate said
described proper[y in[o [hc RM-~+000 (P.CSIUENTIA~, MULTIPLE-FAMILY) ZOi7E upon [he
foll~nainy cAnd'itions which are hcreby founJ [o be a neccssary prerequisite [o the
~roposeJ use of subject propcrty in ordcr [o preserve [he safety and ycnera) welfare
of the Citizens of Che City of Anahcim:
1. That trasti storaye oreas shall be provided in accordance ~~rith approved
pians on filc w,+[h ihc Office of thc Uircctor of Public Worl:s.
2, 3hat firc nyu+ran[s shal) bc installcci and chargeJ,, as required and
determined to be necessary by the Chief of [he Fire Uepartmcnt, prior to commencement
of structural frar~ririg.
3, That subject pro~erty shall be ticrved k~y undcryround vtilitics.
~a, Y-iat draina,e of su6ject arc+,~erty :,hall be disposeJ of in a man~er
satisfaetury to tl:c Lity ~ra9in~er.
5, That [hc owncr(s) of subject property shill pay to thr: Ci[y of Anaheim
tFe appropriate ~~arl; and recrea[ion in-licu fecs as dcCcrmined to ~~e appropriate by
~Fec City Council, said fecs [o be paiu at thc [imc the building pcrmit is issucd.
u. That a{inal c~ac[ map of subjecl prApcrty shali ba submiticd to and
approved by ttie City Council and tlien bc ~ecorded in ttie office of tne Orange CounCy
Recordcr.
7, In tlie event that subjett prc~perty is to be divided ror the purpose of
sale, ie~se or fin~r.cing, a parcel map, to record thc approved division of subject
property, shall bc submitted to and ,approv~cd by the City of Anaheim anci then 6e
recorded in [he Off3ce of the Oranyc County Re wrdcr.
F3, That a,ppropriate water as5essment fecs, as determined by [he Director
nf Public U[iiitacs, shall bc ~aid Lo the Ci[y of Anahcim pri~or to thc issuance nf a
building permit.
_Z_ Pc77-214
;? That a six (6) foot masonry wall shail be c~nstructed al~rtg the east
property lxrec.
10. That Londi[xon Nos. 1. 3, ~+ and 9, abovc nenticned~ sitiall be complied
with priar to fina~ buildireg anu z~nlny inspeeYions.
TiIE FOREGQING R'c50~UT10't~ is signed and approved by ma this 10[h day ~of
October, 1977.
/~..~'~//. ~.-~~
E;P1A'IRHAi~, ~~WHEIM Cl~n PLf1!ltlitl~ C011HlS510N
AT~[ST:
(n J fi ~ ~ /`4'~G! Y•r~ ~
SECRETARY~ AHr^,11EIM GIT,Y PLAt+NIIlG LOMf115S1Utl
S7ATE OF CY;LIFORIIl~~ )
COUt~TY' (SF OP,AtIGE ) ss.
CITY qF f1RlAHEI1+ )
I, Edi'th L. HarKis, Secr~:t<~ry of the Ar~ahe~m City Planning f.orr,nission, do
hereby ~:crtify rhaC [he "FbTCCOing resalukion was passcd ,and adopted at a me+et+ng of
Che .An~heim City k'larnr~,9~ng Commissiora hcid ~rr OcCober {0, 1~77, ai 1:30 P.m., by thc
rol7orriny voGe o~ i't2e r+enb~ers ttar.rcof:
AYCS: C~MMi5S90~1E'r~5: DAVYw, FIERf357, JQ'r~tJ501l, Mlli~, Litltl, TOLAR
t~OfS: COd4N~IS510f1~F15: ~AqbIE
,ABSENT: CONMISS80'NF~RS: ElA~ftNCS
t477
iti 41litJk5~ i~lII~RE~JF, 1 have hereunto set my hand [his 10th day of OctaberF
~:~ ~Z.' ~.~..~
SECRE7ARY, A!INi[IM CITY P~Af1fa~IdG COl1MISSION
_~- P~77~2t4