PC 77-24RESOLUTION N6. PC77-24
A RESOLUTION OF THE ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMNt5510N THA'f
PETITION FOR RECIASSIfICATiON N0. 76-77-3~ BE APPRCVED
NHEREAS, the Anaheim City Planning Commisslon dld receive a verifled
Pe*_itlon far Reclassiflcatlon from A. CHRISTENSEN AND C. STALLINGS, 2o53 Orangegrove.
Orange, Cal~fornta 92667 (Owners) of ccrtain real property situate~ in the C3ty of
Anaheim, County of Orange. State of Callforria described as:
Lot 67 in Tract 109a, as per map recordcd in Boo~ 39 Pages 1 b 2~f Miscellaneous
Maps, ln the Office of the County Recorder oY sald county.
WHERF_AS, the Clty P1•~nning Commission did schedulc a public hearing ~t the
C1ty Hall in the Clty of Anaheiin or. January 17. 1977, at 1:30 p.m., notlce of sald
publlc hearing having been duly given as +•equfred by law ~nd in accoril~n~t with the
provislons of tlie Anahelm Municipal Code, Chaptrr 18.03, to hear and consider
r_viden~e for and against said proposed reclasslflcatlon and to investlgate and make
findings and recommsndatlons In connectlon therewiCh; sa;~ public hear9ng haviny 5een
continued to the Planning Commisslon meeting of January 31. 1917; and
NHEREAS~ said Commisslon, ?fter due inspectlor~, Investlgation and study made
by itsel~ and In lts behalf, an~i after eue consideratlon of all evidence an4 reports
effered at sald hearing; does find and determine the following facts:
1. That Che pet!ti~~ner proposes a reclassificatlon of zoning on the above-
descrlbed property, from th~ RS-7200 (RESIDEN71Al, SINGLE-f~~MILY) ZONE ta the RM-2k~0
(RESIDENTIA~, MUL7iPLE-FAHILY) ZONE.
2, 1'hat the Hnahelm General Plan designaCes the subJect property for low-
density, rasldentlaS lond uses.
3, That Yhe subJecr property fronLS en an arterlal ni~hway, creating an
undesirablc living envi~onment far s~ngte-`amlly resi~entiai develapment with a
potentially greater numbcr pf chlidren than a mult?ple-famlly, resldentlal
development, tht proposed devctc~v~a~~t wlll serve as a buffer between the arterial
highway and single-famlly reslclences to Yha east; and, furthermore, app~oval of thls
reclassificatlon of zoning N'~1 not set a precadent for other l~ts ln the area
located to the east, slncc sa?d lots do not front on an arterlal highway.
q, 7hat the proposed reclasstficatlcn of sub)cct property is necessary
and/or deslrable for the orderly and proper development of the ccrm~nlty.
5, fhat the proposri~:f r~classlficatlon of subJect properYy does properly
relate to tht zones a~d thr.I:' p:~r~it*_ed use3 locally established In close proximity
to subJect praperty and c~ t:~r. znnes and thelr ~~~~+tted uses gcr•~erally eiteblishad
ihroughout lha community.
G. That olx (G) prrs~~nr ~~~~~~~d, roprnwertinp a~praxlrnataly oight6en (18)
por~on• prosnnt ot 9mid publfc !~~ori~p ;;r oF,yowltlon; thnt one (1) porron appaared In
fevor of ¢ho uropo~alj ar~d th~~ a pwt'lt~c~ri algnod by epprox(metoly eighty~seven (87)
a~~a CYlI~anLq and proporty ~~•r«rs Ne~ ~~colvod !n oppo~ltibn to tne aubJcct
pettClon.
RESOLUTION N0. PC77-74
ENVIROWHENTAL ~MPAC7 REPORT FINDiNG: That the Anahelm City Planning
Commissioii daes here y recortmiend to the C(ty Councll of the Clty of Anahetm that a
nagative declaration from the requirements to prepare an environmental impact report
be app~oved for the subJect proJect, pursuant to the provlslons of the Calttornla
Envfronmental Quallty Act.
NOW, THEREFORE~ BE IT RESOLVED that the Anahelm City Planning Commission
does hereby recommend to the Cfcy Council of the Lity of Anahelm ehat subJect
Petltion for Reclassification be approved and, by so doing, tha[ Title 18-Zoning of
the Anahelm Municipal Lode be amended to ~xclude the above-descrlbed property fror,~
the RS-j290 (RESIDENTiAL, SINGLE-FAHILY) ZONE and to incorporate saPd descrTbed
property i~to the RN-2400 (RESlDEkTiAL, MUL7IPLE-FAMILY) ZONE upon the following
ccnditions Nh(ch are hereby found to be a necessary prerequisite to the proposed use
of subJect property in order to preservc th~ safeiy and general rrelfare of the
Citizens of [he City of pnaheim:
1. That s(dewalks shall be Instailed along Knoti Strcet as required by the
City Enyineer and in accordance with standard plans and ~aecificatlons on file in the
Offtce of the City E~ngineer.
2. That the owner(s) of subJect property shall pay to the City af Anahetm
the sum of sixty cents (60ti per fro~it foot along Knott Street ~or trec planting
purposes.
3. That tt~e owner(sj of subJect property shall pay ta the C![y of Anahelm
the sum of two dollars ($2.06) per frcnt foot alon9 Knott Street for street ltghting
purposes.
4. That trash storage areas shali be provided in accordance wltti approved
plans on file with the Offtce of tht Director of Publtc Morks.
5. That flre hydrants sh~ll be lnstall~~:d and charged as requlred a~d
da[ermined to be necessary by the Ch~ef of the Fire Department prior to c~rtrnencemen2
of structurat framing.
6. That subJect ~~ropert~~ shall be served by underground utitttl~~.
7. That a 6-foot high masonry wall shall be constructed along the north,
east, and sou[h property iines.
6. That dralnage of subJect proparty shail be dlsposed af in a man~er
satisfactory to the Clty Enginecr.
9. That thc owner of subJcct property ~hall pay to the City of Anahelm the
approprlote park nnd rncr¢acion in-11eu faes .as deCerml~od to be approprlaie by the
City Council, tslrf }d~s to ba p~ild et the ilme tha bullding permlt t~ I~fued.
10. Fhnt sounJ atcenuotio~~ mea~ures sdJscent to Knott Street shail ba
provlded In accordance wlth Councli Policy No. 542, unless otherwise watved by the
CI¢y Councll.
11. That subJnct property ~hell be dovel~ped precYseiy in accordence wlth
plans and specificatlons on ftle with the Clty of Anahelm marked Rev(s~on Na, i of
Exhibit Nos. 1 throuqh 3. Prlor to the (nt~~auctlon of an ordlnance rezoning subJect
property~ Cond(tlon Nos. 2 and 3, a-~ove-ment.:oned, sha11 he completed. 7he
-2- RESO~UTION NC. PC77-24
pravlsions or rights granted byi [his resofutlon shall become null and voEd by action
of t?ie City Council uniess said con~itions are complied wich withtn one year fTmm the
date hcreof, or such further time as the Lity Cauncil may grant.
12. 7hat Condttfon hlos. l, 4, 6~ 7, 8, 10, and 11, abov~-mentioned, shall
be complied wlih prior to final bullding and zoning {ns~ecttons.
THE FOREGOING aESOLUiION Is signed and apprnve~ by me this 31st day of
January~ 1977. ~
~
~HAIRHAN ANAHEI LI Y PG,ANNING LONNISSIDM
ATT'cST:
~~~,~'~~~
SECRETARY, ANAHEIhS CITY PLA~NING COMMISSI~JN
S7ATE Of CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORAMCE )ss.
CITY OF ANAHE4M )
i, Patricla B. Scanl.~n, Secretary o` :hc Anai~~im CI[y Planning LcrtmTsslon,
do hercby certify Lhat che. forcr,oir~g resolut`.e~ was passed and adop2ed at a m~etiny
of the Anaheim Ctty Planning t;nrtmisslo~~, heid on January 31, 1977, at 1:30 p.m „ by
tht following vote of the membzrs there~f:
AYES: GOMMISSIOMERS: BARNES, OAViD, NER(?5?~ I(~HG, M~RLEY~ 70LAR
HOES: CQHMISSIOFiERS: NONE
ABSEN7: COHHISSI~NERS: NONE
ABS7AIN: COM',11SSIONERS: JOHNS~N
1977.
iN WITHE55 NNERE~F, I have hereunto set my hand this 31st day of January
SE RE/~ AR{~AN N. NN I~~G C4MM I SS I i)~i
-3- RESOLUTION N0. PC77~24