PC 77-270RESOLUTIOIa N0. PC77-27Q
A RESOLU710~~ ~J~ TI~E ANNHEIM i,ITY PLANNING CONMISSION
THAT PETITIOt~ FOR VARIAt~C~ N0. 29~0 EiE GR~INTED
UHEREAS, the Anah~im City Planning Commission did receive a verified
Petition for Variance from KOIZUMI II~TERNATiONAL, INL., 1401 Uove Street, Suite 650~
Newport Beach, California 926(>0, owncr, and INTER-VERDE CORPORATIOtI, 1401 Dove
Street, Sui[e 650, Newport Bea:ti, California 92G60, ayent, of certain real property
situated in the City of Anahcim, Coun[y of Orange, Statc of California, described as:
Lot 15 of Tract 71~3, as per map recorded in Boak 22, Page 10 of
Miscellaneo~s Maps, in the office of [he County Recorder of said
County; and
WHEREAS, the Gity Plannin~J Conrnission did hold a public hearing at the Ci[y
Nall in the Ci[y of Anaheim on DecemSer ~, 1977, at 1:30 p.m., notl,~e of said public
hearing haviny been duly given as required by law and in accordance with the
provisions of the Anaheim Municipal Code, Ch~pter 1n.03, to hear and consider
evidence for and against said proposed variancc and [o investiga[e and make findings
and recu~.mendatlons i~ connection therewith; and
WHER[A5, said Com~r~ission, after due inspection, investigation and study made
by itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all evidence and reports
offered a[ saiJ hcaring, does find and Jeterr~ine the foilowing facts:
1. That [he pcti[ioner proposes a waiver of ehe following to establish a
one-lot, nine-unit condominiwn subdivision:
SELTION 18.31.062.012 - Maximurn structural hei hi. (~nc sto
pr.rrnitted wi[ in ~~ of one- ami y
residential zoning; two stories proposed)
2. That the above-mentioned waIvcr is hereby yr~n[ed on thc basls [hat the
petitfoncr dcinonstrated tti~t a hardship exists i~ that, alttiough nearby propertfes
are currently zoned RS-A-43,000 (Residential/Agricultural), the General Plan
designation is for law-medium density residential lan~ uses, similar to the proposal.
3, That there are exceptional or ex[raordinary circumstances or conditions
applicable to the property involvcd or to the intended uss of the property that do
not apply yenerally to the property or class of use in the sarne vicinity and zone.
4. Tha[ the req~ested v~riance is necessary for the preservation and
enJoyment of a substantial property right possessed by other property in the same
victnity and zone, and denicd [o thc property in question.
5. That [he requested variancc will not be materially detrimental to the
public welfar~ or inJurious [o the property or improvements in such vicinity and zone
in Nhich the proper[y is located.
6. That no on~: indlcated their presence at said public hearing in
oppositton and one person indica[ed her presence in support; and that no
correspondence was received in opposition to subject petitlon.
Pc71-270
ENVIRONMEPITAL IMPACT FINOIUG: That the Anaheim City Planning Commissian has
reviewed su jec: proposal to ~eclassify the zoning frem RS-A-43~000
(Residenttal/Agricultural) to RN-4000 (Residential, Multiple-F.:m~ly) to establtsh a
one-lot, nine-unit condominium subdivision with waiver of maximun ~tructural height
on property consistiny of approximately one acre having a fro~tac~e ~f approximately
119 feet on the norih side of Savanna Street, having a maximum clep[h o` approxisnately
3B3 feei, being loc~ted approximately 54G feet west of the centerlfne uT t:nott
Street; and cloes hereby approve the Negative Declaration from the requirement to
prepare an envtronmental impact report on the basis [hat there would be no
significant individual or cumulative adverse environmental impac[ due [o the approval
of this Negative Declaration since the Anaheim General Plan designates the s~bject
property fur low-mediun density residential land uses commensurate with the proposal;
that no sensitive environmcr.tal impacts a*c involved in tfie proposal; tlia[ the
Initial Study submitted by the petitioner i~dicates no significant individual or
cumulative adverse environmental impacts; and that the Negative Declaration
substa~tlatiny the foregaing findinys is on file in the City of Anaheim Planning
Department.
NOYl~ THEREFORC, EiL IT RESOI.V[D that the Anaheim City Planning Cortvnission
dues hereby grant subject Petition for Variance, upon the following conditions which
are liereby found to be a necessary prerequisite to tlie proposed use of the subject
property in order to prescrvr the safe[y and qeneral v~clfare of thc Citizens of the
City of Anaheim:
l. 7hat [his Variance is granted subject t~ the completion of
Reclassiflcation I~o. 77-7~-29, now pending.
2, That subject property shall be Jeve:oped subsianCially in accordance
with plaris and specifications on file with the City af Anaheim marked Exhibit I~os. 1
throuyh 7.
TtiE FOP,EGOING RESOLUTIOtI is siyneJ and approv~d by mc this Sth day of
December, 1977.
~.~, ~"'~'f' ~~
CHAIR t~, h~ll HEIN LITY pLANtIING CONM155EDN
ATT[ST:
~
i.~~~ .f ~/;,z.<<:~
SECRETAR , At~AH[ 111 ITY LAN~lI1~G LOMMI SS 011
STATE Of CALIFORNIA )
LOUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF AI~tilElf4 )
1, Edith L. Harrls, Secretary of the Anaheim City Planning Conunlssion, da
hereby certify that thc forcyoiny resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of
[he Anaheim Ci[y Planning Lommission held on December 5, 1977, at 1:30 p.m., by the
followiny vote of [he members thereof:
AYES: CO'riMI55tONERS: E3ARNE5, DAVIU, tiER8S7, Y.ItiG, LINH~ TOLAR
NOE5: COMMISSIOI~ERS: NOlIL
AE35Et1T: G011NISSIONERS: JOHNSOtJ
411 WlTNE55 WIiEREOf~ 1 have he~eunto set my hand 2his Sth day of December,
19?7. ' t . .l~ " ~z.i~
-2- ~ PC77-2?0