PC 77-272RcSOLUTI0t1 I~O. PC77-272
A R[SOLUTION GF THE AIJAHEIM CI7Y PLAt~NING LONMIS5101!
THAT PET17i0t! F~R RECLASSIFICATION N0. 77-JB-33 4E GP,ANTED
WkI~REAS, thc Analieim City Planning Convnission did receive a verificd
Petition for Reclassification from EDDIE J. AIlU I.OE AP111 CORRALES, 55^ Los Coyotes
Drive, Anaheim, California 92007, owners, ar.d DON E3ROWN, 2204 East La Palma Avenue,
Anaheim, California `)23Q1., agent, of ccrtain rcal property situated in the City of
Anaheim, County of Oranyc, Statc of California, described as:
A por[ion of Lo[ II of Analicim Extension, as shoarn on a map of
Survey madc by William Hamel, dated and acknowled'ged Decembcr 11,
1lfG8 by A. Robinson, Trustce, and fi led in ttic of`ice of C!ie
County RecorJer of Los Angeles County, Galifornia, described as
beyinning a[ a point dlstan[ 02 feet Easterly, measured along a
linc parallel v~ith Santa Ana Street, fron, a point on the Westerly
lfne of said Lot $, said las[ named poin[ being ~i$7.; feet
Nor[herly fron the Southwest corner of said iut; [hence Northerly
parallel wi[h [he 'desterly line of said lot, 96.5 feet; thence
tlorthwesterly 12.u1 fcet to a point 77. feeL Easterly, metisured
alony a line drawn Easterly parallcl wi[h Santa Ana Strect, from a
point on ttie Westerly line of said lo[, distant ~~)2 fect Nortfierly
from the Southwest corner of said Lot; thence Westerly alony said
line drawn Easterly parallel o-iitfi [he South line of said Lot to
said poin[ on thc Westerly line of said Lot distan[ 592 feet
Northerly fron tlie Southwest corner uf said Lot; thence Northerly
along the 'desterly line of said Lot 37.5 feet; thence at right
angles and Easterly parallcl wi[h Santa Ana Stree[, 'L11."L fee[;
thence at r(yht anylcs Southerly and parallel wi[h [ast Street 202
feet to a point in a line drawn Eastcrly parallel with Santa Ana
S[reet from the point of bcyinniny; thencc Westerly parallel with
Santa Ana Stree[, 129."L feet to the pain[ of beginni~y; and
1!H[REAS, the City Planniny Coewnission did hold a public hcariny at the City
HaDI in the City of Anaheim on December 5, 1977, at 1:30 p.m., notice of said public
hearing liaviny been duly give~ as required by law and in accordanca with the
provisions of the Anat~eim Nunicipal Code, Chap[er 1E.03, to hear and consider
evidence for and aaains[ saiJ proposed reclassification and to investigate and make
findings and recoumk:ndations in connection Chcrewi[h; and
WHCR[A5, said Commission, after Jue inspection, inves[iga[ion and sludy made
by itself and in its behalf, and after due consi~eration of all evidence and reports
offere~ at said he.~~ing, does find and determine the followiny fac[s:
1. That the peti[ioner proposes reclassification of subject property from
Cfic R11-2~i0i~ (RLSIU[tITIAL, MULTIPLE-fAMIIY) ZOIJC to the R11-1200 (RESIDEl~TIAL,
MULTIPL[-FAMILY) ZQtdE.
2. Tfiat thc llnafieim Gencral Plan desiynates subject properly for madium
densi[y reside~tiai land uses.
PC77-272
3. That the proposed reclassification is hereby granted subject to
petitioner's stipulation that a ten (10) foo[ wide, densely landscaped buffer area
shall be provided along the east property line adjacent to RS-7200 (Residential,
Single-Family) zoning; and that said ten (10) foot buffer width, although less than
the twenty (20) feet typically required, is suitable in vieai of the fac[ that
surrounding R~-1200 properties are curren[ly developed wi*_hout such landscaped
buffering adjacent to single-family residential areas.
4. That the proposed reclassification of subject property is necessary
and/or desirable for the orderly and proper developmen[ of the community.
5, Tha[ the proposed reclassification of subjec[ property does properly
relate to the zones and their permitted uses locally established in close proximi[y
to subject property and to the zones and their permitted uses generally established
throughout the community.
6. That the proposed reclassification of subject property requires the
dedication and improvement of abutting stree[s in accordanee with the Circulation
Element of the General Plan, due Co the anticipa[ed increase in traffic which will be
generated by the intensification of land use.
7. That no one indicated their presence at said public hearing in
opposition; and that no correspondence was received in opposition to subject
petition.
ENVIROtJHENTAL IMPACT FINDING: That the Anaheim City Planning Cormiission has
reviewed subject proposa to reclassify the zonin9 from RH-2400 (Residential,
Multiple-Family) to RM-1200 (Residential, Multiplc-Fanily) on approximately 0.8 acres
of land having a frontage of approximately 98 fect on [he east side of East Streec,
having a maximum depth of approximately 211 feet, be~ng located approximately 1;5
feet south of the centerline of Broadyay; and does hereby approve the Negative
Declaration from [he requirement to prepare an environmen[al impact report on the
basis that there would be no significant individual or cumulative adverse
environmental impact due to tfie approval of this t~egative Declaration since the
Anaheim General Plan designates the subject property for medium density residential
land uses commensurate with the proposal; that no sensitive environmental impacts are
involvEd in the proposal; that the initial 5tudy submitted by the petitiQner
indicates no significant individual or cumula[ive adverse environmental impacts; and
that the Negative Declaration subs[antiatiny the foregoing findings is on file in the
City of Anaheim Planning Department.
NOW, TIIEREFORE, BE 17 RESOLVED [hat the Anaheim City Pianning Commission
daes hereby grant subject Petition for Reclassification and, by so doing, that Title
18-Zoning of the Anaheim Municipal Code be amended to exclude the above-described
property from the RM-2400 (RESIDENTIAL, IIULTIPLE-FAMILY RESlDENTIAL) ZOt~E and to
incorporate said described property into the RM-1200 (RESIDENTIAL, MULTIPLE-FAMILY)
ZONF upon the following conditions which are hereby T~und to be a necessary
prerequisite to the proposed use of subject pruperty in order to preserve the safety
and general welfare of the Citizens of the City of M ahPim;
i. 7hat the owner(s) of subject property shall deed to the City of Anaheim
a strip of land forty (40) feet in width frc~m the centerllne of the street along East
Street for street widening purposes.
-2- QC77-272
2, That the owner(s) of subject property shall pay to the Li[y o` Anaheim
the sum of three dollars and fifty cents ($3.50) per front foot along East Street for
street lighting purposes.
3, That the owner(s) of subject ~perty shall pay te tlie City of Anah~im
the sum of sixty cents (60C) per front foot along East Street for tree planting
purposes.
4. That trash storage areas shall be provided in accordance with approved
plans on file with the office of thc Director of Public Works.
5. That fire hydrants shall be installed and charged, as required and
determined to be necessary by the Chief of the Fire Department, prior to commencement
of s[ructural framing.
6. That subject property shall be served by underground utili[ies.
7. ThaC drainage of subject property shall be disposed of in a manner
satisfactory to the City Engineer.
8, In the event that subject property is to be divided for the purpose of
sale, lease, or financing, a parcel map, to record the approved division of subject
property, shall be submitted to and approved by the City of Anaheim a~nd then be
recorded in the office of the Orange County Recurder.
9, That the owner(s) of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim
the appropriate park and recreation in-lie~ fees, as de[ermined to be appropriate by
the City Council, said fees to be paid at the time the building permit is issued.
10. That appropriate water assessment fecs, as determined by the Director
of Public Utilities, shall be paid to the City of Anaheim prior to the issuance of a
building permit.
>>, Prior to the introduction of an ordinance rezoning subject property,
Condition Nos. 1, 2, 3 and 8, above mentioned, shall be completed. The provisions or
rights granted by this resolution shall become null and void by action of the
Planning Commission unless said conditions are complied with within one year from the
date hereof, or such further tine as the Planning Commission may grant.
12, Tha[ Condition I~os. 4, 6 and 7, above mentioned, shall be complied with
prior to final building ana zoning inspections.
TIIE FOREGOIP~G RESOLUTIOtI is signed and approved by me this 5th day of
December, 1977•
~
-, ~~/~ l// `r-`~~'.~
CHAIRMAN, ANAHEIM CITY PLAIJNING COMMISSION
ATTEST:
~~~ ~ ~-~
5ECRETA , NA E M CI~Y ~LAt~~~IrIG COM111S5 N
STATE UP CALlFORNIA }
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF At~ANEIM )
-3- PC77-272
I, Edith L. Harris, Secretary of the Anaheim Ctty Planning Commissian, do
hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopteJ at a meeting of
the Anaheim City Planning Commission held on December 5, 1977, at 1:30 p.m., by the
following vote of the members thereof:
AYES: COHMISSIONEP,S: DARNES, DAVID~ HERBST~ KING~ LINN, TOLAR
NOES: COMMiS510NERS: N04E
ABSENT: C0~4MISSIONERS: JONNS01!
1977.
IP~ WITP~ESS WHEREOF, 1 have hereunto set rtry hand this 5th day of December,
~~- .~ ~~.~
SECRETARY, ANAHEIM CITY PLAt~NING COMMISSI N
-4• PC77-272