PC 77-278RESOLUTIOt7 N0. PC77-~7~
A RESDLUTION OF THE ANANEIM CITY PLAN~dIN~ COM~115S10'i
THAT PETITION F05 C~PJDITIONAL USE PE4"+IT Nn. 1732 BE DENIED
WHEREAS, the Anaheim City Pla~ninq Commission did receive a verified
Pet i t i on for Cond i t i ona t Use Perm i t f rom ALBE?.T DF Nl;SL 1 ~ Atd~ DF.LE FN~~ I LY TP,UST, 1 130
Arholeta Drive, La Habra, California ~0631, owners, anci ~ILBE°.T A. THONAS, 1442
Irvine Boulevard, Suite 11°, Tustin, California 92~~p~, agent, of certain real
property situated in the City of l~naheim, County of Orange, St~te of California,
described as:
That portion of Lot 7 of "Anaheim Er.tension", as shown on a map cf
survey by William Hamel, acl:nowledned by Alfred Robinson, Trustee,
recordeJ in Los Angeles Co~nty, California, described as heginninn
at ihc Southeast corner ef that certain parcel of land conveyed [o
Fred 0. Thompson and Ethel Thompsc>n, by deed recorded December 2,
1?44, in book 128~, page 419, Official Records, said point being
located on the center line of Placentia Avr_nue, at a point 213•O(1
feet North 4° 07' 30" East from the intersection of said center
line ~~lth the center line of East Cen,rr S[reet, running thence
Nor[h 0° 07' 3~" East 36.03 feet alonq said center line to the
true point of beginnirg; [hence South pl~ 1°' 3~~~ West 357.1' fer_t
to a poin[ in the k~est line of said parcel, said poin[ heinn ~iso
Worth 12° 08' West 35 feet from the Southwest corner of said
parcel; thence Florth 12° Ob' b'est c1.F3 feet along said West line
to a point; thencc North 77° 52' •'-n" East 377.~~ Fret to a polnt
in the Eas[erly line of said parcel, ~Iso the center llne of
Placentia Avenue; thence South ~° 07' 3~" 'aest 1~5.2', feetalong
the Easterly line of said parcel to the point of beqinning.
EY,CFPTING TIIERCFP,OM the por[ion included in oublic highway along
the East sidc; and
~lHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did hold a public tiearin~ at the City
Hall in the City of Anaheim on Decemher S, 1°77, at 1:3~ p.m „ notice of said public
hearing having been duly given as required by law and in accordance with the
provisions of th~. Anaheim Municipal Code, Chapter 13.03, to hear and consider
evidence for and against said proposed conditional use and to investigate and make
findin9s and recommendations in co~nection thereo~ith; and
WHEREA5, sald Ca~nmisslon, after due inspection, investiga[ion and study made
by itself and in its bzhalf, and after due consideration of all evidence and reports
offered at said hearing, does find and determine the followin9 facks:
1. That the proposed use is oroperly one for which a conditional use
permit is authorized hy Anaheim Municipal Code Sec[lon iR.03.~30.010 to wit: Co
permit a public dance hall with a waiver of:
SECTIOiI 18.06.06Q.~237 - Minimum number of oarkina spaces.
Q spaces requirecJ; ~a spaces proposed)
2, That the proposed used is hereby denied on thc hasis that the proposed
discotheque-type use i•rould creaie more traffic and cause parking probleMS to the
PC77-27'~
surrounding area, and that the hours of oo~ration ~•rould be an intru.,ion on the
surrounding residential areas tn terns of noise and lights.
3. That the proposed use will adversely affect the adioinino land uses and
the growtli and development of the area in whic~ it is proposed to be located.
4. That the size and shape of Lhe site pronosed for the use is not
adequzte to allo~•r the full developnc of the proposed use in a nanner not
detrimental to Lhe par[Icular area ~~ to the peace, health, safety, and general
welfare of thc Citizens of the City oF Anahe~m,
5. Tha[ the granting of ihe Conditional Use Wermit ~•rill be detrimental to
thc peace, hcalth, safe[y and qeneral ~•ielfare of the iiti:~ens of the City of Anaheim.
6. That onc pers~n indicated his presence at said public hearing in
opposition; and tha*_ one letter rras received in onposi[ion t~ the subject petition.
ENVIRON'!ENTAL IHPhCT FIt7DING: The Director of the Plannin9 Dcpartment has
determined that the provosed activity falls ~•ri[hin th~: definition of Section 3,01,
Class 1, of the City of Anah~im Guidclines [o the Requirements for an Environmental
Impact Report and is, therefore, categoric.~lly exemot from the reouirement to file an
EIR.
NOW, THEP,EFORE, BE IT RESOLI~E~ that the Anaheim City Plannin~ Cortmission
does hereby deny suhject Petitio~ for Conditional Use Permit on the basis of the
aforementioned findin9s.
THE fOREG0IN; RESOt,JTIOM is si~ned and approved by mc•. this ;th day of
December, 1~77.
ATTfST:
,~~~,~- ;~ l: '~~
CHA RM11N, A!U1HE1'i CITY PLPN`IIHG CONMI55ION
l~ ~~ ~ / ~Q'LLCS -
SECRETIIRY, AtJANEIH CITY PLl1NNItJ~ CONMI5510~!
STATE OF CAL I FORt~ 1/1 )
COI+~~TY OF ORANr,E ) ss.
CITY OF At~AHEIM )
I, Edith L. Harris, Secre W ry of the Anaheim City P1anning Commission, do
hereby certify that [he foregofng resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of
the Anaheim City Plannirtg Commission held on December 5, 1`~77, at 1:3p p.m., by [he
followin9 vote of the members thereof:
AYFS: COHM I SS I OIiFP,S: DAV I D, NFRE3ST, K I I~G, L I NN,
WOE5: C0~1~91SS10'~ERS: BAP.t~FS, TOLA.R
ABSENT: COMt11SS10`IERS: JOHNSOfI
I~~ WITtJE55 4~t1ERE0F, I have hereunto set my hand this 5th day of December,
1~7'l.
L~.,~Ll~. •z• l'~l~t~u~
SECRETAP,Y, AtlAHEIN CITY PLANt71N~ COMMISSION
-2- PC77-278